* Re: [linux-lvm] Can't get merge in background using blockdev api to work
2022-01-03 15:49 ` Vojtech Trefny
@ 2022-01-05 8:12 ` Tomas Dalebjörk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Dalebjörk @ 2022-01-05 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5344 bytes --]
Hi Vojtech,
Thanks for looking it up.
It looks like the merging started in the background after all.
But here is the issue..
Merge initiates at 2022-01-04 17:40:31
2022-01-04.17:40:31 MERGELV
And I do get a return code of that it starting in background, as the next
command is executed, that tries to mount the filesystem
2022-01-04.17:40:37 MOUNTFS
But, in the kernel log I can see these errors from mountfs, which I looping
with a retry every 1s until it can get mounted
Jan 4 17:40:38 debian10 kernel: [42138.075811] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:39 debian10 kernel: [42139.522164] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:41 debian10 kernel: [42140.877383] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:42 debian10 kernel: [42142.337237] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:43 debian10 kernel: [42143.757615] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:45 debian10 kernel: [42145.155576] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:46 debian10 kernel: [42146.277236] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:47 debian10 kernel: [42147.287412] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:48 debian10 kernel: [42148.317816] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:49 debian10 kernel: [42149.322470] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:50 debian10 kernel: [42150.332581] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:51 debian10 kernel: [42151.334976] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
Jan 4 17:40:52 debian10 kernel: [42152.337999] XFS (dm-6): device supports
1024 byte sectors (not 512)
And the mountfs loop only ends when the merge has completed, hence the
question of if it really works in the background?
The merge ends when the next command is about to be executed, where I am
trying to reduce the disk from the volume group
2022-01-04.17:40:53 VGREDUCE
And there are no indication of any file system errors either
Jan 4 17:40:53 debian10 kernel: [42153.374758] XFS (dm-6): Mounting V5
Filesystem
Jan 4 17:40:53 debian10 kernel: [42153.378430] XFS (dm-6): Starting
recovery (logdev: internal)
Jan 4 17:40:53 debian10 kernel: [42153.378741] XFS (dm-6): Ending recovery
(logdev: internal)
Jan 4 17:41:53 debian10 kernel: [42213.622453] block nbd3: NBD_DISCONNECT
I have not analyzed into this more deeply, but could it be that LVM merge
has a pre-phase step, where it has to scan all the blocks first before
actually starting a merge?
Because that can explain why, as our disks are emulated block device coming
from the nmd devices
Or do you have any tips that can lead us into the right track?
Regards Tomas
Den tis 4 jan. 2022 kl 09:09 skrev Vojtech Trefny <vtrefny@redhat.com>:
> Hi, libblockdev maintainer here, libblockdev is a separate project from
> LVM so it's better to ask on our GitHub[1], but I'm reading this ML too so
> I can answer here.
>
> I did a quick test and the background merge works for me, so I think the
> problem is somewhere in LVM or with your setup, not in libblockdev -- all
> we do is run the "lvm lvconvert --merge <vg>/<snap> --background" command
> so there isn't a big room for a bug in our code (but I'm not saying there
> isn't one). I've modified your code a little bit[2], can you try running it
> again? I've just added logging so we can see what we actually tell LVM to
> run and also enabled LVM logging and saved the log to /tmp/lvm.log.
>
> [1] https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev
> [2] https://gist.github.com/vojtechtrefny/7f379596958a0c4cd4c287c3f7a7dddd
>
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 9:06 AM Tomas Dalebjörk <tomas.dalebjork@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to start a merge to the previous snapshot to be started with
>> the "-b" flag (background). But it seems to be that the merging has not
>> started in the background at all.
>>
>> BDExtraArg lv_arg = {"--background",""};
>> const BDExtraArg *extra_args[2] = {&lv_arg, NULL};
>>
>> BDPluginSpec lvm_plugin = {BD_PLUGIN_LVM, "libbd_lvm.so.2"};
>> BDPluginSpec *plugins[] = {&lvm_plugin,NULL};
>>
>> bd_switch_init_checks (FALSE, &error);
>> bd_ensure_init (plugins, NULL, &error);
>> bd_lvm_lvsnapshotmerge(vg_name,lv_snap,extra_args,&error);
>>
>> Couldn't find any details about how to do this using the libblockdev api,
>> but according to the documentation, it should be possible to add the same
>> flags as for the normal LVM commands.
>>
>> Could you please give me a hint of what I am doing wrong?
>>
>> Regards Tomas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-lvm mailing list
>> linux-lvm@redhat.com
>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
>> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 7478 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 201 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread