Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] m68k/kernel - wire up syscall_trace_enter/leave for m68k

[Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>]

Hi Geert, Greg,

no matter - I managed to at least get entry.S to 'compile' for 68000, 
even though the final link failed.

I'm reasonably certain that 'ret_from_exception' is the correct branch 
target if a syscall is to be skipped, but I'd like to have that double 
checked?

Cheers,

	Michael

Am 29.06.2021 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Ungerer:
> Hi Michael, Geert,
>
> On 29/6/21 5:31 pm, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:16 AM Michael Schmitz
>> <schmitzmic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 28/06/21 7:25 pm, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 2:46 AM Michael Schmitz
>>>> <schmitzmic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> m68k (other than Coldfire) uses syscall_trace for both trace entry
>>>>> and trace exit. Seccomp support requires separate entry points for
>>>>> trace entry and exit which are already provided for Coldfire.
>>>>>
>>>>> Replace syscall_trace by syscall_trace_enter and syscall_trace_leave
>>>>> in preparation for seccomp support. Check return code of
>>>>> syscall_trace_enter(), and skip syscall if -1. Return code will be
>>>>> left at what had been set by ptrace or seccomp (in regs->d0).
>>>>>
>>>>> No regression seen in testing with strace on ARAnyM.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
>>>> b
>>>> Thanks for your patch!
>>>>
>>>>>    arch/m68k/kernel/entry.S  |  8 +++++---
>>>> We need similar changes to arch/m68k/68000/entry.S and
>>>> arch/m68k/coldfire/entry.S
>>>
>>> Do you have a current defconfig for 68000? I've test compiled my patch
>>> with two coldfire defconfigs, but could not find one for m68kclassic ...
>>
>> Unfortunately not.
>> Greg?
>
> Sorry, no, I don't have one.
> Whenever I need to compile for a 68000 target I manually configure one
> ("make menuconfig" and friends).
>
> Would be nice to have one in mainline ;-)
>
> Regards
> Greg
>