Re: [PATCH 0/4] landlock.7: Code example improvements

["Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>]

On 19/04/2023 22:37, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi Günther!
> 
> On 4/19/23 20:54, Günther Noack wrote:
>> Various improvements as pointed out by Mickaël Salaün in
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/5d90e3b0-1577-7efd-03b8-f94b6e50fbc1@digikod.net/
>>
>> * Checking system call results differently, for consistency
>> * Use constants for the compatibility table
>>    (I'm not very attached to the other solution)
>> * Better wording for error message if Landlock unusable
>> * Return instead of exit() if Landlock unusable
>>
>> Regarding the EOPNOTSUPP/ENOTSUP discussion, the consensus seems to be
>> that EOPNOTSUPP is preferable, because that is the only of the two
>> error codes that the kernel knows about.
>>
>> Günther Noack (4):
>>    landlock.7: Check syscall result with == -1 instead of <= 0
>>    landlock.7: Use LANDLOCK_* constants for compatibility table
>>    landlock.7: wfix: Error message wording in code example
>>    landlock.7: Return instead of exit() if Landlock is unusable
> 
> Thanks!  Patch set applied.  (I tweaked the commit messages a little
> bit.)

Thanks Günther and Alex!

> 
> Cheers,
> Alex
> 
>>
>>   man7/landlock.7 | 12 ++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> base-commit: 6693a21cf73c502f2429b4ec07698130a2be9a93
>