From: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Cc: <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
<mchehab@kernel.org>, <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>, <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <sj.huang@mediatek.com>,
<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<louis.kuo@mediatek.com>, <shengnan.wang@mediatek.com>,
<dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [V9, 2/2] media: i2c: ov02a10: Add OV02A10 image sensor driver
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:46:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1591958798.8804.660.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200610194455.GK201868@chromium.org>
Hi Tomasz,
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 19:44 +0000, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Dongchun,
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 04:41:03PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> > Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for OV02A10 image sensor.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig | 13 +
> > drivers/media/i2c/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c | 1025 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 1040 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c
> >
>
> Thank you for the patch. Please see my comments inline.
>
> [snip]
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..160a0b5
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c
> [snip]
> > +static const char * const ov02a10_test_pattern_menu[] = {
> > + "Disabled",
> > + "Color Bar",
>
> nit: We should normalize this to one of the standard names. What is the
> pattern on this sensor? Is it perhaps "Eight Vertical Colour Bars"?
>
Yes. It is one kind of 'Eight Vertical Colour Bars'.
This pattern is called as 'MIPI color bar' per the datasheet.
Can we here use 'Vertical Color Bar' or 'MIPI Color Bar'?
> > +};
> [snip]
> > +static int ov02a10_set_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_format *fmt)
> > +{
> > + struct ov02a10 *ov02a10 = to_ov02a10(sd);
> > + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mbus_fmt = &fmt->format;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&ov02a10->mutex);
> > +
>
>
> Don't we need to handle the case when fmt->which is V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY,
> which is used for trying the format, but not applying it to the hardware?
>
Got it :-)
> > + if (ov02a10->streaming) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&ov02a10->mutex);
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Only one sensor mode supported */
> > + mbus_fmt->code = ov02a10->fmt.code;
> > + ov02a10_fill_fmt(ov02a10->cur_mode, mbus_fmt);
> > + ov02a10->fmt = fmt->format;
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&ov02a10->mutex);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ov02a10_get_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_format *fmt)
> > +{
> > + struct ov02a10 *ov02a10 = to_ov02a10(sd);
> > + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mbus_fmt = &fmt->format;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&ov02a10->mutex);
> > +
> > + fmt->format = ov02a10->fmt;
>
> Ditto.
>
> > + mbus_fmt->code = ov02a10->fmt.code;
> > + ov02a10_fill_fmt(ov02a10->cur_mode, mbus_fmt);
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&ov02a10->mutex);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ov02a10_enum_mbus_code(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_mbus_code_enum *code)
> > +{
> > + struct ov02a10 *ov02a10 = to_ov02a10(sd);
> > +
> > + if (code->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(supported_modes))
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Hmm, supported_modes[] doesn't seem to hold the information about mbus
> codes. Should this just perhaps be "!= 0"?
>
Understood.
> > +
> > + code->code = ov02a10->fmt.code;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> [snip]
> > +static int ov02a10_entity_init_cfg(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg)
> > +{
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_format fmt = {
> > + .which = cfg ? V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY : V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE,
> > + .format = {
> > + .width = 1600,
> > + .height = 1200,
> > + }
> > + };
> > +
> > + ov02a10_set_fmt(sd, cfg, &fmt);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> I'm not familiar with this init_cfg operation and the documentation is very
> sparse about it. Sakari, is this a correct implementation?
>
> [snip]
> > +static int ov02a10_set_test_pattern(struct ov02a10 *ov02a10, int pattern)
> > +{
> > + struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&ov02a10->subdev);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, REG_PAGE_SWITCH, REG_ENABLE);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, OV02A10_REG_TEST_PATTERN,
> > + pattern);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, REG_GLOBAL_EFFECTIVE,
> > + REG_ENABLE);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, REG_SC_CTRL_MODE,
> > + SC_CTRL_MODE_STREAMING);
>
> Why is this needed? Does writing the test pattern register stop streaming?
>
Looking back to the setting history, I found it was suggested by OV.
I would leave your question to OV, and update their feedback.
> [snip]
> > +static int ov02a10_initialize_controls(struct ov02a10 *ov02a10)
> > +{
> > + struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&ov02a10->subdev);
> > + const struct ov02a10_mode *mode;
> > + struct v4l2_ctrl_handler *handler;
> > + struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl;
> > + u64 exposure_max;
> > + u32 pixel_rate;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + handler = &ov02a10->ctrl_handler;
> > + mode = ov02a10->cur_mode;
> > + ret = v4l2_ctrl_handler_init(handler, 7);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + handler->lock = &ov02a10->mutex;
> > +
> > + ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_new_int_menu(handler, NULL, V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ, 0, 0,
> > + link_freq_menu_items);
> > + if (ctrl)
> > + ctrl->flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
> > +
> > + pixel_rate = to_pixel_rate(0);
> > + v4l2_ctrl_new_std(handler, NULL, V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE, 0, pixel_rate, 1,
> > + pixel_rate);
> > +
> > + exposure_max = mode->vts_def - 4;
> > + ov02a10->exposure = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(handler, &ov02a10_ctrl_ops,
> > + V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE,
> > + OV02A10_EXPOSURE_MIN,
> > + exposure_max,
> > + OV02A10_EXPOSURE_STEP,
> > + mode->exp_def);
> > +
> > + v4l2_ctrl_new_std(handler, &ov02a10_ctrl_ops,
> > + V4L2_CID_ANALOGUE_GAIN,
> > + OV02A10_GAIN_MIN,
> > + OV02A10_GAIN_MAX,
> > + OV02A10_GAIN_STEP,
> > + OV02A10_GAIN_DEFAULT);
> > +
> > + v4l2_ctrl_new_std_menu_items(handler, &ov02a10_ctrl_ops,
> > + V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN,
> > + ARRAY_SIZE(ov02a10_test_pattern_menu) - 1,
> > + 0, 0, ov02a10_test_pattern_menu);
> > +
>
> I can see that we're missing some controls here now, VBLANK and HBLANK if I
> remember correctly. Even though read-only, some userspace need those to
> get information about how the sensor operates.
>
Yes. I made a mistake.
> > + if (handler->error) {
> > + ret = handler->error;
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to init controls(%d)\n", ret);
> > + goto err_free_handler;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ov02a10->subdev.ctrl_handler = handler;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err_free_handler:
> > + v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(handler);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> [snip]
> > + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> > + if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) {
> > + ret = ov02a10_power_on(dev);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to power on: %d\n", ret);
> > + goto err_free_handler;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev(&ov02a10->subdev);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to register V4L2 subdev: %d", ret);
> > + if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev))
> > + ov02a10_power_off(dev);
>
> Please don't mix inline and error-path error handling, as it makes it
> difficult to tell if it's correct. Please move this below the appropriate
> err label instead.
>
Fixed in next release.
> > + goto err_clean_entity;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err_clean_entity:
>
> If one calls pm_runtime_enable() in the probe path, one needs to call
> pm_runtime_disable() on the error and remove paths.
>
Yes, fixed in next release.
> > + media_entity_cleanup(&ov02a10->subdev.entity);
> > +err_free_handler:
> > + v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(ov02a10->subdev.ctrl_handler);
> > +err_destroy_mutex:
> > + mutex_destroy(&ov02a10->mutex);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-12 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-23 8:41 [V9, 0/2] media: i2c: Add support for OV02A10 sensor Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-23 8:41 ` [V9, 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Document OV02A10 bindings Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-26 18:28 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-27 8:49 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-27 15:27 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-27 21:16 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-05-28 3:34 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-28 7:23 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-05-28 8:04 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-29 13:43 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-01 2:33 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-01 18:18 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-02 6:15 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-02 9:56 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-04 2:20 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-02 9:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-05-28 5:53 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-23 8:41 ` [V9, 2/2] media: i2c: ov02a10: Add OV02A10 image sensor driver Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-04 2:14 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-04 9:26 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-04 18:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 3:19 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-10 19:44 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-11 9:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-11 9:57 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-11 10:03 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-12 11:01 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-12 10:46 ` Dongchun Zhu [this message]
2020-06-12 18:39 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-15 5:54 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-15 12:44 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1591958798.8804.660.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=louis.kuo@mediatek.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shengnan.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=sj.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).