From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Dongchun Zhu" <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Nicolas Boichat" <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Cao Bing Bu" <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Sj Huang" <sj.huang@mediatek.com>,
"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Louis Kuo" <louis.kuo@mediatek.com>,
"Shengnan Wang (王圣男)" <shengnan.wang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [V9, 2/2] media: i2c: ov02a10: Add OV02A10 image sensor driver
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:57:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5BBxBEs=gCohOzOGzkTDNkL1yyu7dtEY26K52=CmFAWnA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200611095333.GK16711@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:53 AM Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 07:44:55PM +0000, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Hi Dongchun,
> >
> > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 04:41:03PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> > > Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for OV02A10 image sensor.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > > drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig | 13 +
> > > drivers/media/i2c/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c | 1025 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 1040 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c
> > >
> >
> > Thank you for the patch. Please see my comments inline.
> >
> > [snip]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..160a0b5
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c
> > [snip]
> > > +static const char * const ov02a10_test_pattern_menu[] = {
> > > + "Disabled",
> > > + "Color Bar",
> >
> > nit: We should normalize this to one of the standard names. What is the
> > pattern on this sensor? Is it perhaps "Eight Vertical Colour Bars"?
> >
> > > +};
> > [snip]
> > > +static int ov02a10_set_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > + struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> > > + struct v4l2_subdev_format *fmt)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ov02a10 *ov02a10 = to_ov02a10(sd);
> > > + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mbus_fmt = &fmt->format;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&ov02a10->mutex);
> > > +
> >
> >
> > Don't we need to handle the case when fmt->which is V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY,
> > which is used for trying the format, but not applying it to the hardware?
>
> Yes.
>
> >
> > > + if (ov02a10->streaming) {
> > > + mutex_unlock(&ov02a10->mutex);
> > > + return -EBUSY;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Only one sensor mode supported */
> > > + mbus_fmt->code = ov02a10->fmt.code;
> > > + ov02a10_fill_fmt(ov02a10->cur_mode, mbus_fmt);
> > > + ov02a10->fmt = fmt->format;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_unlock(&ov02a10->mutex);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ov02a10_get_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > + struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> > > + struct v4l2_subdev_format *fmt)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ov02a10 *ov02a10 = to_ov02a10(sd);
> > > + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mbus_fmt = &fmt->format;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&ov02a10->mutex);
> > > +
> > > + fmt->format = ov02a10->fmt;
> >
> > Ditto.
> >
> > > + mbus_fmt->code = ov02a10->fmt.code;
> > > + ov02a10_fill_fmt(ov02a10->cur_mode, mbus_fmt);
> > > +
> > > + mutex_unlock(&ov02a10->mutex);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ov02a10_enum_mbus_code(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > + struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> > > + struct v4l2_subdev_mbus_code_enum *code)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ov02a10 *ov02a10 = to_ov02a10(sd);
> > > +
> > > + if (code->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(supported_modes))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Hmm, supported_modes[] doesn't seem to hold the information about mbus
> > codes. Should this just perhaps be "!= 0"?
> >
> > > +
> > > + code->code = ov02a10->fmt.code;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > [snip]
> > > +static int ov02a10_entity_init_cfg(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > + struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct v4l2_subdev_format fmt = {
> > > + .which = cfg ? V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY : V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE,
> > > + .format = {
> > > + .width = 1600,
> > > + .height = 1200,
> > > + }
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + ov02a10_set_fmt(sd, cfg, &fmt);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> >
> > I'm not familiar with this init_cfg operation and the documentation is very
> > sparse about it. Sakari, is this a correct implementation?
>
> The purpose is to initialise a pad configuration (format and selection
> rectangles) to the device defaults. As there seem to be no selection
> rectangles, this seems fine to me.
Thanks. I traced the code and could only see one place where the
callback is being called and that was with cfg != NULL. Still, the
code above uses "cfg ?" as a check to determine whether TRY or ACTIVE
should be passed to which. Is that also correct?
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-11 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-23 8:41 [V9, 0/2] media: i2c: Add support for OV02A10 sensor Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-23 8:41 ` [V9, 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Document OV02A10 bindings Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-26 18:28 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-27 8:49 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-27 15:27 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-27 21:16 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-05-28 3:34 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-28 7:23 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-05-28 8:04 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-29 13:43 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-01 2:33 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-01 18:18 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-02 6:15 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-02 9:56 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-04 2:20 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-02 9:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-05-28 5:53 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-05-23 8:41 ` [V9, 2/2] media: i2c: ov02a10: Add OV02A10 image sensor driver Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-04 2:14 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-04 9:26 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-04 18:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 3:19 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-10 19:44 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-11 9:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-11 9:57 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2020-06-11 10:03 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-12 11:01 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-12 10:46 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-12 18:39 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-15 5:54 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-15 12:44 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAFQd5BBxBEs=gCohOzOGzkTDNkL1yyu7dtEY26K52=CmFAWnA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=louis.kuo@mediatek.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shengnan.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=sj.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).