From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@linuxtv.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: Ralph Metzler <rjkm@metzlerbros.de>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Driver support for cards based on Digital Devices bridge (ddbridge)
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:01:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E207252.5050506@linuxtv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E203FD0.4030503@redhat.com>
On 15.07.2011 15:25, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 15-07-2011 05:26, Ralph Metzler escreveu:
>> At the same time I want to add delivery system properties to
>> support everything in one frontend device.
>> Adding a parameter to select C or T as default should help in most
>> cases where the application does not support switching yet.
>
> If I understood well, creating a multi-delivery type of frontend for
> devices like DRX-K makes sense for me.
>
> We need to take some care about how to add support for them, to avoid
> breaking userspace, or to follow kernel deprecating rules, by adding
> some legacy compatibility glue for a few kernel versions. So, the sooner
> we add such support, the better, as less drivers will need to support
> a "fallback" mechanism.
>
> The current DVB version 5 API doesn't prevent some userspace application
> to change the delivery system[1] for a given frontend. This feature is
> actually used by DVB-T2 and DVB-S2 drivers. This actually improved the
> DVB API multi-fe support, by avoiding the need of create of a secondary
> frontend for T2/S2.
>
> Userspace applications can detect that feature by using FE_CAN_2G_MODULATION
> flag, but this mechanism doesn't allow other types of changes like
> from/to DVB-T/DVB-C or from/to DVB-T/ISDB-T. So, drivers that allow such
> type of delivery system switch, using the same chip ended by needing to
> add two frontends.
>
> Maybe we can add a generic FE_CAN_MULTI_DELIVERY flag to fe_caps_t, and
> add a way to query the type of delivery systems supported by a driver.
>
> [1] http://linuxtv.org/downloads/v4l-dvb-apis/FE_GET_SET_PROPERTY.html#DTV-DELIVERY-SYSTEM
I don't think it's necessary to add a new flag. It should be sufficient
to add a property like "DTV_SUPPORTED_DELIVERY_SYSTEMS", which should be
read-only and return an array of type fe_delivery_system_t.
Querying this new property on present kernels hopefully fails with a
non-zero return code. in which case FE_GET_INFO should be used to query
the delivery system.
In future kernels we can provide a default implementation, returning
exactly one fe_delivery_system_t for unported drivers. Other drivers
should be able to override this default implementation in their
get_property callback.
Regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-15 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-03 21:21 [PATCH 0/5] Driver support for cards based on Digital Devices bridge (ddbridge) Oliver Endriss
2011-07-03 21:23 ` PATCH 1/5] ddbridge: Initial check-in Oliver Endriss
2011-07-03 21:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] ddbridge: Codingstyle fixes Oliver Endriss
2011-07-03 21:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] ddbridge: Allow compiling of the driver Oliver Endriss
2011-07-03 21:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] cxd2099: Fix compilation of ngene/ddbridge for DVB_CXD2099=n Oliver Endriss
2011-07-04 10:14 ` Bjørn Mork
2011-07-03 21:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] cxd2099: Update Kconfig description (ddbridge support) Oliver Endriss
2011-07-04 0:06 ` Walter Van Eetvelt
2011-07-03 22:27 ` [PATCH 0/5] Driver support for cards based on Digital Devices bridge (ddbridge) Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-03 23:24 ` Oliver Endriss
2011-07-04 0:17 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-14 23:45 ` Oliver Endriss
2011-07-15 0:47 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-15 2:11 ` Oliver Endriss
2011-07-15 4:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-15 3:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-15 5:17 ` Oliver Endriss
2011-07-15 8:26 ` Ralph Metzler
2011-07-15 13:25 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-15 17:01 ` Andreas Oberritter [this message]
2011-07-15 17:34 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-15 23:41 ` Antti Palosaari
2011-07-16 12:25 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-16 14:16 ` Antti Palosaari
2011-07-16 14:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-16 15:40 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-07-16 15:44 ` Antti Palosaari
2011-07-16 15:53 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-07-16 15:59 ` Antti Palosaari
2011-07-16 16:37 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-07-17 2:51 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-07-17 7:51 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-07-17 0:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-17 3:02 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-07-17 3:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-17 7:39 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-07-17 8:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-17 1:07 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-16 15:40 ` Oliver Endriss
2011-11-03 7:49 ` Steffen Barszus
2011-11-03 17:24 ` Lars Hanisch
2011-07-15 4:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-15 5:21 ` Oliver Endriss
2011-07-15 12:40 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-07-17 11:44 ` Oliver Endriss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E207252.5050506@linuxtv.org \
--to=obi@linuxtv.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=rjkm@metzlerbros.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).