Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

[Hans de Goede]

Hi All,

IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a new
stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases
and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the
same time there have been no issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems
stable).

So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 release ?

Regards,

Hans

Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

[Hans Verkuil]

On Fri 14 June 2013 09:15:02 Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a new
> stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases
> and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the
> same time there have been no issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems
> stable).
> 
> So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 release ?

Fine by me!

Note that the libv4l2rds code is now finalized, so that can be released as
well.

Regards,

	Hans

Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

[Devin Heitmueller]

I've got a fix for a really bad performance bug, so if you can hold
off on doing a release a couple of hours until I can get in front of
my Linux box and submit a patch, I would appreciate it.

Thanks,

Devin

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On Fri 14 June 2013 09:15:02 Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a new
>> stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases
>> and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the
>> same time there have been no issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems
>> stable).
>>
>> So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 release ?
>
> Fine by me!
>
> Note that the libv4l2rds code is now finalized, so that can be released as
> well.
>
> Regards,
>
>         Hans
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com

Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:15:02 +0200
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> escreveu:

> Hi All,
> 
> IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a new
> stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases
> and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the
> same time there have been no issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems
> stable).
> 
> So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 release ?

Fine for me. 

There are 5 patches floating at patchwork to improve the DVB-S support 
with different types of DiSEqC, but applying them would break library support
for tvd. So, they won't be applied as-is, and Guy needs to take some other
approach. As he is also planning to add support there for rotors, it
looks ok to postpone such changes to a latter version.

So, feel free to bump it to version 1.0.

Regards,
Mauro
-- 

Cheers,
Mauro

Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

[Guy Martin]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:34:04 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:

> Em Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:15:02 +0200
> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> escreveu:
> 
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up
> > to a new stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no
> > maintenance 0.8.x releases and a lot of interesting development
> > going on in the 0.9.x, while at the same time there have been no
> > issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems stable).
> > 
> > So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0
> > release ?
> 
> Fine for me. 
> 
> There are 5 patches floating at patchwork to improve the DVB-S
> support with different types of DiSEqC, but applying them would break
> library support for tvd. So, they won't be applied as-is, and Guy
> needs to take some other approach. As he is also planning to add
> support there for rotors, it looks ok to postpone such changes to a
> latter version.

Can we wait a little bit more like a week max ?
I'd like to see the polarization stuff fixed because otherwise you
can't use sat at all with libdvbv5.

I'll work on the new patches this weekend. I'll hopefully have
something today.
I'll see what I can do wrt DiSEqC stuff but that can definitely wait a
latter release.

  Guy

Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 06/15/2013 12:33 PM, Guy Martin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:34:04 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Em Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:15:02 +0200
>> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up
>>> to a new stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no
>>> maintenance 0.8.x releases and a lot of interesting development
>>> going on in the 0.9.x, while at the same time there have been no
>>> issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems stable).
>>>
>>> So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0
>>> release ?
>>
>> Fine for me.
>>
>> There are 5 patches floating at patchwork to improve the DVB-S
>> support with different types of DiSEqC, but applying them would break
>> library support for tvd. So, they won't be applied as-is, and Guy
>> needs to take some other approach. As he is also planning to add
>> support there for rotors, it looks ok to postpone such changes to a
>> latter version.
>
> Can we wait a little bit more like a week max ?

Sure, I was just trying to see what people think about doing a 1.0.0
release. I see no reason to rush it.

Regards,

Hans

Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

[Gregor Jasny]

Hello,

On 6/14/13 9:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 release ?

I'm fine with preparing a 1.0.0 release.

But I'm under the impression that the libdvbv5 interface is not polished 
enough to build a shared library from it. So I'd like to change the 
autoconf default to false and skip installing the static and shared library.

Any objections?

Thanks,
Gregor

Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

[Gregor Jasny]

Hello Guy,

On 6/15/13 12:33 PM, Guy Martin wrote:
> Can we wait a little bit more like a week max ?
> I'd like to see the polarization stuff fixed because otherwise you
> can't use sat at all with libdvbv5.
>
> I'll work on the new patches this weekend. I'll hopefully have
> something today.
> I'll see what I can do wrt DiSEqC stuff but that can definitely wait a
> latter release.

I saw your patches were merged to v4l-utils. Is there anything else 
you'd like to have included in a v4l-utils 1.0.0 release?

Thanks,
Gregor

Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

[Guy Martin]

Hi Gregor,

On 2013-07-25 14:36, Gregor Jasny wrote:
> I saw your patches were merged to v4l-utils. Is there anything else
> you'd like to have included in a v4l-utils 1.0.0 release?

Nope, that's all I wanted to have for this release.

Next thing will be to work on better diseqc support but it can wait for 
another release.

   Guy

Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

[Gregor Jasny]

Hello,

On 6/14/13 9:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a
> new
> stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases
> and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the
> same time there have been no issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems
> stable).
>
> So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 release ?

If nobody objects I'll do a 1.0.0 release this weekend.

Thanks,
Gregor

Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release

[Hans Verkuil]

Hi Gregor,

Let me know when you've branched 1.0.0. I want to merge Bård's work for qv4l2
(openGL support, upcoming audio support and other improvements), but I can't do
that until after you made the 1.0.0 branch.

Thanks!

	Hans

On 08/01/2013 08:28 PM, Gregor Jasny wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 6/14/13 9:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a
>> new
>> stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases
>> and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the
>> same time there have been no issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems
>> stable).
>>
>> So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 release ?
> 
> If nobody objects I'll do a 1.0.0 release this weekend.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gregor
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>