Linux-mediatek Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
To: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] soc: mediatek: add mtk-devapc driver
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:41:12 +0800
Message-ID: <1596426072.22971.14.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAOTY_-3vs9VdAs3RHc_-MQJ7HbmqXKgULC_H0grr3q7oNDxMQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Chun-Kuang,

On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 23:55 +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> Hi, Neal:
> 
> Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com> 於 2020年7月31日 週五 上午10:52寫道:
> >
> > Hi Chun-Kuang,
> >
> > On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 00:14 +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > > Hi, Neal:
> > >
> > > Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com> 於 2020年7月29日 週三 下午4:29寫道:
> > > >
> > > > MediaTek bus fabric provides TrustZone security support and data
> > > > protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected
> > > > masters.
> > > > The security violation is logged and sent to the processor for
> > > > further analysis or countermeasures.
> > > >
> > > > Any occurrence of security violation would raise an interrupt, and
> > > > it will be handled by mtk-devapc driver. The violation
> > > > information is printed in order to find the murderer.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * devapc_extract_vio_dbg - extract full violation information after doing
> > > > + *                          shift mechanism.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void devapc_extract_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       const struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs *vio_dbgs;
> > > > +       struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info;
> > > > +       void __iomem *vio_dbg0_reg;
> > > > +       void __iomem *vio_dbg1_reg;
> > > > +       u32 dbg0;
> > > > +
> > > > +       vio_dbg0_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_dbg0;
> > > > +       vio_dbg1_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_dbg1;
> > > > +
> > > > +       vio_dbgs = ctx->vio_dbgs;
> > > > +       vio_info = ctx->vio_info;
> > > > +
> > > > +       /* Starts to extract violation information */
> > > > +       dbg0 = readl(vio_dbg0_reg);
> > > > +       vio_info->vio_addr = readl(vio_dbg1_reg);
> > > > +
> > > > +       vio_info->master_id = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->mstid.mask) >>
> > > > +                             vio_dbgs->mstid.start;
> > > > +       vio_info->domain_id = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->dmnid.mask) >>
> > > > +                             vio_dbgs->dmnid.start;
> > > > +       vio_info->write = ((dbg0 & vio_dbgs->vio_w.mask) >>
> > > > +                           vio_dbgs->vio_w.start) == 1;
> > > > +       vio_info->read = ((dbg0 & vio_dbgs->vio_r.mask) >>
> > > > +                         vio_dbgs->vio_r.start) == 1;
> > > > +       vio_info->vio_addr_high = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->addr_h.mask) >>
> > > > +                                 vio_dbgs->addr_h.start;
> > >
> > >
> > > I would like to define the type of ctx->vio_info to be
> > >
> > > struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs {
> > >     u32 mstid:16;
> > >     u32 dmnid:6;
> > >     u32 vio_w:1;
> > >     u32 vio_r:1;
> > >     u32 addr_h:4;
> > >     u32 resv:4;
> > > };
> > >
> > > so the code would like the simple way
> > >
> > > ctx->vio_info = (struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs)readl(vio_dbg1_reg);
> > >
> >
> > This idea looks great! Is there any possible to pass the bit layout by
> > DT data, and still make this operation simple?
> > Why am I asking this question is because this bit layout is platform
> > dependent.
> 
> I doubt these info would be in a single 32-bits register for all
> future SoC. If they are not in single 32-bits register, you may create
> a vio_dbgs_type in DT data, and the code may be
> 
> if (ctx->vio_dbgs_type == VIO_DBGS_TYPE_MTxxxx) {
>     ctx->vio_info = (struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs)readl(vio_dbg1_reg);
> } else if (ctx->vio_dbgs_type == VIO_DBGS_TYPE_MTyyyy) {
>     ctx->vio_info->mstid = readl(vio_mstid_reg);
>     ctx->vio_info->dmnid = readl(vio_dmnid_reg);
>     ctx->vio_info->vio_w = readl(vio_vio_w_reg);
>     ctx->vio_info->vio_r = readl(vio_vio_r_reg);
> }
> 
> I think we need not to consider how the future would be. Once the
> second SoC driver is upstreaming, we could find out the best solution
> for it.
> 

Okay, I'll apply this on next patch.
Thanks !

> Regards,
> Chun-Kuang.
> 
> >
> > > Regards,
> > > Chun-Kuang.
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +       devapc_vio_info_print(ctx);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> >

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

  reply index

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-29  8:18 [PATCH v4] Add MediaTek MT6779 devapc driver Neal Liu
2020-07-29  8:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: devapc: add bindings for mtk-devapc Neal Liu
2020-07-29  8:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] soc: mediatek: add mtk-devapc driver Neal Liu
2020-07-29 16:38   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-31  2:44     ` Neal Liu
2020-07-31 15:03       ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-03  3:32         ` Neal Liu
2020-08-03 16:13           ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-04  2:18             ` Neal Liu
2020-08-04 15:27               ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-29 22:47   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-31  2:47     ` Neal Liu
2020-07-30 16:14   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-31  2:52     ` Neal Liu
2020-07-31 15:55       ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-03  3:41         ` Neal Liu [this message]
2020-08-01  0:12   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-03  4:01     ` Neal Liu
2020-08-03 16:04       ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-04  2:08         ` Neal Liu
2020-08-04 15:55           ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-01 23:50   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-03  4:05     ` Neal Liu
2020-08-03 15:38       ` Chun-Kuang Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1596426072.22971.14.camel@mtkswgap22 \
    --to=neal.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-mediatek Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/0 linux-mediatek/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-mediatek linux-mediatek/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek \
		linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
	public-inbox-index linux-mediatek

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-mediatek


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git