linux-mediatek.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: "Guangming.Cao" <guangming.cao@mediatek.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
	"sumit.semwal@linaro.org" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"wsd_upstream@mediatek.com" <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	"libo.kang@mediatek.com" <libo.kang@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"yf.wang@mediatek.com" <yf.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"lmark@codeaurora.org" <lmark@codeaurora.org>,
	"benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org" <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
	"bo.song@mediatek.com" <bo.song@mediatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"labbott@redhat.com" <labbott@redhat.com>,
	"mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com" <mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com>,
	"jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com" <jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:17:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLUSjHoLpgFLcvqmDfv7Uip2VwHS5d_5x2nzw=P3rA2NDA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82faa62f1bc946cf2f9ee2f7d15c567162238eab.camel@mediatek.com>

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 4:04 AM Guangming.Cao
<guangming.cao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 08:16 +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > Am 14.01.22 um 00:26 schrieb John Stultz:
> > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 5:05 AM Christian König
> > > <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
> > > > Am 13.01.22 um 14:00 schrieb Ruhl, Michael J:
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On
> > > > > > Behalf Of
> > > > > > Ruhl, Michael J
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
> > > > > > > On Behalf Of
> > > > > > > guangming.cao@mediatek.com
> > > > > > > +   /*
> > > > > > > +    * Invalid size check. The "len" should be less than
> > > > > > > totalram.
> > > > > > > +    *
> > > > > > > +    * Without this check, once the invalid size allocation
> > > > > > > runs on a process
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > +    * can't be killed by OOM flow(such as "gralloc" on
> > > > > > > Android devices), it
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > +    * cause a kernel exception, and to make matters worse,
> > > > > > > we can't find
> > > > > > > who are using
> > > > > > > +    * so many memory with "dma_buf_debug_show" since the
> > > > > > > relevant
> > > > > > > dma-buf hasn't exported.
> > > > > > > +    */
> > > > > > > +   if (len >> PAGE_SHIFT > totalram_pages())
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If your "heap" is from cma, is this still a valid check?
> > > > >
> > > > > And thinking a bit further, if I create a heap from something
> > > > > else (say device memory),
> > > > > you will need to be able to figure out the maximum allowable
> > > > > check for the specific
> > > > > heap.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe the heap needs a callback for max size?
> Yes, I agree with this solution.
> If dma-heap framework support this via adding a callback to support it,
> seems it's more clear than adding a limitation in dma-heap framework
> since each heap maybe has different limitation.
> If you prefer adding callback, I can update this patch and add totalram
> limitation to system dma-heap.

If the max value is per-heap, why not enforce that value in the
per-heap allocation function?

Moving the check to the heap alloc to me seems simpler to me than
adding complexity to the infrastructure to add a heap max_size
callback. Is there some other use for the callback that you envision?

thanks
-john

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-15  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-17  9:41 [PATCH] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size limitation for allocation guangming.cao
2021-12-27  9:51 ` [PATCH v2] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check " guangming.cao
2022-01-03 18:57   ` John Stultz
2022-01-04  7:47     ` Christian König
2022-01-04  8:44       ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-05  6:36       ` guangming.cao
2022-01-13 10:50         ` Sumit Semwal
2022-01-13 12:34           ` [PATCH v3] " guangming.cao
2022-01-13 12:57             ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:00               ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:05                 ` Christian König
2022-01-13 23:26                   ` John Stultz
2022-01-14  7:16                     ` Christian König
2022-01-14 12:05                       ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-15  1:17                         ` John Stultz [this message]
2022-01-19  9:59                           ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-19 20:37                             ` John Stultz
2022-01-20  3:34                               ` [PATCH v4] dma-buf: system_heap: " guangming.cao
2022-01-20  3:48                                 ` John Stultz
2022-01-20  7:08                                   ` [PATCH v5] " guangming.cao
2022-01-20  8:27                                     ` Christian König
2022-01-20  8:52                                       ` [PATCH v6] " guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:00                                         ` [PATCH v6 RESEND] " guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:22                                           ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALAqxLUSjHoLpgFLcvqmDfv7Uip2VwHS5d_5x2nzw=P3rA2NDA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=bo.song@mediatek.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=guangming.cao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=libo.kang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lmark@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
    --cc=mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yf.wang@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).