From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"bagasdotme@gmail.com" <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, "Christopherson,,
Sean" <seanjc@google.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Shahar, Sagi" <sagis@google.com>,
"imammedo@redhat.com" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
"sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/20] x86/virt/tdx: Implement functions to make SEAMCALL
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:43:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bbeb95691cbda6ac9fef0ec0f3dd0b4f7b00d2b.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c551c360-4924-c42e-d4d9-b56ad6d6e2fd@intel.com>
On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 10:20 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/20/22 16:26, Kai Huang wrote:
> > TDX introduces a new CPU mode: Secure Arbitration Mode (SEAM). This
> > mode runs only the TDX module itself or other code to load the TDX
> > module.
> >
> > The host kernel communicates with SEAM software via a new SEAMCALL
> > instruction. This is conceptually similar to a guest->host hypercall,
> > except it is made from the host to SEAM software instead.
> >
> > The TDX module defines a set of SEAMCALL leaf functions to allow the
> > host to initialize it, and to create and run protected VMs. SEAMCALL
> > leaf functions use an ABI different from the x86-64 system-v ABI.
> > Instead, they share the same ABI with the TDCALL leaf functions.
>
> I may have suggested this along the way, but the mention of the sysv ABI
> is just confusing here. This is enough for a changelog:
>
> The TDX module establishes a new SEAMCALL ABI which allows the
> host to initialize the module and to and to manage VMs.
>
> Kill the rest.
Thanks will do.
>
> > Implement a function __seamcall() to allow the host to make SEAMCALL
> > to SEAM software using the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro which is the common
> > assembly for both SEAMCALL and TDCALL.
>
> In general, I dislike mentioning function names in changelogs. Keep
> this high-level, like:
>
> Add infrastructure to make SEAMCALLs. The SEAMCALL ABI is very
> similar to the TDCALL ABI and leverages much TDCALL
> infrastructure.
Will do.
>
> > SEAMCALL instruction causes #GP when SEAMRR isn't enabled, and #UD when
> > CPU is not in VMX operation. The current TDX_MODULE_CALL macro doesn't
> > handle any of them. There's no way to check whether the CPU is in VMX
> > operation or not.
>
> What is SEAMRR?
Sorry it is a leftover. Should be "when TDX isn't enabled".
>
> Why even mention this behavior in the changelog. Is this a problem?
> Does it have a solution?
My intention was to provide some background information why to extend
TDX_MODULE_CALL macro to handle #UD and #GP as mentioned below.
>
> > Initializing the TDX module is done at runtime on demand, and it depends
> > on the caller to ensure CPU is in VMX operation before making SEAMCALL.
> > To avoid getting Oops when the caller mistakenly tries to initialize the
> > TDX module when CPU is not in VMX operation, extend the TDX_MODULE_CALL
> > macro to handle #UD (and also #GP, which can theoretically still happen
> > when TDX isn't actually enabled by the BIOS, i.e. due to BIOS bug).
>
> I'm not completely sure this is worth it. If the BIOS lies, we oops.
> There are lots of ways that the BIOS lying can make the kernel oops.
> What's one more?
I agree. But if we want to handle #UD, then #GP won't cause oops any more, so I
just added error code for #GP too.
Or perhaps we can change to below: ?
"... extend the TDX_MODULE_CALL to handle #UD (and opportunistically #GP since
they share the same assembly)."
Or other suggestions?
>
> > Introduce two new TDX error codes for #UD and #GP respectively so the
> > caller can distinguish. Also, Opportunistically put the new TDX error
> > codes and the existing TDX_SEAMCALL_VMFAILINVALID into INTEL_TDX_HOST
> > Kconfig option as they are only used when it is on.
> >
> > As __seamcall() can potentially return multiple error codes, besides the
> > actual SEAMCALL leaf function return code, also introduce a wrapper
> > function seamcall() to convert the __seamcall() error code to the kernel
> > error code, so the caller doesn't need to duplicate the code to check
> > return value of __seamcall() and return kernel error code accordingly.
>
>
[...]
> > +/*
> > + * Wrapper of __seamcall() to convert SEAMCALL leaf function error code
> > + * to kernel error code. @seamcall_ret and @out contain the SEAMCALL
> > + * leaf function return code and the additional output respectively if
> > + * not NULL.
> > + */
> > +static int __always_unused seamcall(u64 fn, u64 rcx, u64 rdx, u64 r8, u64 r9,
> > + u64 *seamcall_ret,
> > + struct tdx_module_output *out)
> > +{
> > + u64 sret;
> > +
> > + sret = __seamcall(fn, rcx, rdx, r8, r9, out);
> > +
> > + /* Save SEAMCALL return code if caller wants it */
> > + if (seamcall_ret)
> > + *seamcall_ret = sret;
> > +
> > + /* SEAMCALL was successful */
> > + if (!sret)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + switch (sret) {
> > + case TDX_SEAMCALL_GP:
> > + /*
> > + * platform_tdx_enabled() is checked to be true
> > + * before making any SEAMCALL.
> > + */
>
> This doesn't make any sense. "platform_tdx_enabled() is checked"???
>
> Do you mean that it *should* be checked and probably wasn't which is
> what caused the error?
I meant tdx_enable() already calls platform_tdx_enabled() to check whether BIOS
has enabled TDX at the very beginning before making any SEAMCALL, so
theoretically #GP should not happen unless there's BIOS bug. I thought a WARN()
can help to catch.
>
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> > + fallthrough;
> > + case TDX_SEAMCALL_VMFAILINVALID:
> > + /* Return -ENODEV if the TDX module is not loaded. */
> > + return -ENODEV;
>
> Pro tip: you don't need to rewrite code in comments. If the code
> literally says, "return -ENODEV", there is very little value in writing
> virtually identical bytes "Return -ENODEV" in the comment.
>
Indeed. Thanks for the tip! I'll update those comments.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-23 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 163+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 0:26 [PATCH v7 00/20] TDX host kernel support Kai Huang
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 01/20] x86/tdx: Define TDX supported page sizes as macros Kai Huang
2022-11-21 2:52 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-11-21 9:15 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 17:23 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-11-21 18:12 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-21 23:48 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-22 0:01 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 02/20] x86/virt/tdx: Detect TDX during kernel boot Kai Huang
2022-11-21 3:07 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-11-21 9:37 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 23:57 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-11-22 0:10 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-22 11:28 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-22 16:50 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-22 23:21 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 03/20] x86/virt/tdx: Disable TDX if X2APIC is not enabled Kai Huang
2022-11-21 3:51 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-11-21 9:44 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 22:00 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-11-21 23:40 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 23:46 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-22 0:30 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-22 0:44 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-22 0:58 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 04/20] x86/virt/tdx: Add skeleton to initialize TDX on demand Kai Huang
2022-11-22 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-22 10:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-22 15:35 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-22 20:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-22 20:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-23 0:30 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-23 1:12 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-23 11:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-23 12:22 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-22 18:05 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-23 10:18 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-23 16:58 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-23 21:58 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 05/20] x86/virt/tdx: Implement functions to make SEAMCALL Kai Huang
2022-11-22 9:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-23 8:53 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-22 18:20 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-23 10:43 ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 06/20] x86/virt/tdx: Shut down TDX module in case of error Kai Huang
2022-11-22 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-22 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-22 15:14 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-22 19:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-22 19:24 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-22 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-23 1:14 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-29 21:40 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-30 11:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-23 0:58 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-23 1:04 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-23 1:22 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-23 16:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-23 16:41 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-23 17:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-23 18:18 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-23 19:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-22 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-22 15:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-22 19:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-22 19:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-23 9:39 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-22 15:20 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-22 16:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-22 18:57 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-22 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-23 1:24 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 07/20] x86/virt/tdx: Do TDX module global initialization Kai Huang
2022-11-22 19:14 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-23 11:45 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 08/20] x86/virt/tdx: Do logical-cpu scope TDX module initialization Kai Huang
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 09/20] x86/virt/tdx: Get information about TDX module and TDX-capable memory Kai Huang
2022-11-22 23:39 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-23 11:40 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-23 16:44 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-23 22:53 ` Huang, Kai
2022-12-02 11:19 ` Huang, Kai
2022-12-02 17:25 ` Dave Hansen
2022-12-02 21:57 ` Huang, Kai
2022-12-02 11:11 ` Huang, Kai
2022-12-02 17:06 ` Dave Hansen
2022-12-02 21:56 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 10/20] x86/virt/tdx: Use all system memory when initializing TDX module as TDX memory Kai Huang
2022-11-21 5:37 ` Huang, Ying
2022-11-21 9:09 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-22 1:54 ` Huang, Ying
2022-11-22 9:16 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-24 0:47 ` Huang, Ying
2022-11-22 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-22 11:40 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-23 0:21 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-23 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-24 1:04 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-24 1:22 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-24 2:27 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-24 1:50 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-24 9:06 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-25 9:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-28 8:38 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-28 8:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-28 9:21 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-28 9:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-28 9:50 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-24 9:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-24 10:02 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-30 22:26 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 11/20] x86/virt/tdx: Add placeholder to construct TDMRs to cover all TDX memory regions Kai Huang
2022-11-23 22:17 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-24 9:51 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-24 12:02 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-28 15:59 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-28 22:13 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-28 22:19 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-28 22:50 ` Huang, Kai
2022-12-07 11:47 ` Huang, Kai
2022-12-08 12:56 ` Huang, Kai
2022-12-08 14:58 ` Dave Hansen
2022-12-08 23:29 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 12/20] x86/virt/tdx: Create " Kai Huang
2022-11-23 22:41 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-24 11:29 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 13/20] x86/virt/tdx: Allocate and set up PAMTs for TDMRs Kai Huang
2022-11-23 22:57 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-24 11:46 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-28 16:39 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-28 22:48 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-28 22:56 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-28 23:14 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 14/20] x86/virt/tdx: Set up reserved areas for all TDMRs Kai Huang
2022-11-23 23:39 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-28 9:14 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-28 13:18 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-28 22:24 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-28 22:58 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-28 23:10 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 15/20] x86/virt/tdx: Reserve TDX module global KeyID Kai Huang
2022-11-23 23:40 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-24 22:39 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 16/20] x86/virt/tdx: Configure TDX module with TDMRs and " Kai Huang
2022-11-23 23:56 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-25 0:59 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-25 1:18 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-25 1:44 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 17/20] x86/virt/tdx: Configure global KeyID on all packages Kai Huang
2022-11-24 0:28 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-24 22:28 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-25 0:08 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-30 3:35 ` Binbin Wu
2022-11-30 8:34 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-30 14:04 ` kirill.shutemov
2022-11-30 15:13 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-30 20:17 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-30 17:37 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 18/20] x86/virt/tdx: Initialize all TDMRs Kai Huang
2022-11-24 0:42 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-25 2:27 ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 19/20] x86/virt/tdx: Flush cache in kexec() when TDX is enabled Kai Huang
2022-11-21 0:26 ` [PATCH v7 20/20] Documentation/x86: Add documentation for TDX host support Kai Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bbeb95691cbda6ac9fef0ec0f3dd0b4f7b00d2b.camel@intel.com \
--to=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).