From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas@shipmail.org>,
"Jerome Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Linux List Kernel Mailing" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cleanup the walk_page_range interface
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:23:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a0e8f03-d1c6-9325-1db3-2c3e2fd0f7d5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190827233619.GB28814@mellanox.com>
On 28/08/2019 00:36, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 04:34:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:34:13 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:43:12PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>>> So what is the plan forward? Probably a little late for 5.3,
>>>>>> so queue it up in -mm for 5.4 and deal with the conflicts in at least
>>>>>> hmm? Queue it up in the hmm tree even if it doesn't 100% fit?
>>>>>
>>>>> Did we make a decision on this? Due to travel & LPC I'd like to
>>>>> finalize the hmm tree next week.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think we've made any decision. I'd still love to see this
>>>> in hmm.git. It has a minor conflict, but I can resend a rebased
>>>> version.
>>>
>>> I'm looking at this.. The hmm conflict is easy enough to fix.
>>>
>>> But the compile conflict with these two patches in -mm requires some
>>> action from Andrew:
>>>
>>> commit 027b9b8fd9ee3be6b7440462102ec03a2d593213
>>> Author: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
>>> Date: Sun Aug 25 11:49:27 2019 +1000
>>>
>>> mm: introduce MADV_PAGEOUT
>>>
>>> commit f227453a14cadd4727dd159782531d617f257001
>>> Author: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
>>> Date: Sun Aug 25 11:49:27 2019 +1000
>>>
>>> mm: introduce MADV_COLD
>>>
>>> Patch series "Introduce MADV_COLD and MADV_PAGEOUT", v7.
>>>
>>> I'm inclined to suggest you send this series in the 2nd half of the
>>> merge window after this MADV stuff lands for least disruption?
>>
>> Just merge it, I'll figure it out. Probably by staging Minchan's
>> patches after linux-next.
>
> Okay, I'll get it on a branch and merge it toward hmm.git tomorrow
>
> Steven, do you need the branch as well for your patch series? Let me know
Since my series is (mostly) just refactoring I'm planning on rebasing it
after -rc1 and aim for v5.4 - I don't really have the time just now to
do that.
But please keep me in the loop because it'll reduce the surprises when I
do do the rebase.
Thanks,
Steve
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-28 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-08 15:42 cleanup the walk_page_range interface Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: split out a new pagewalk.h header from mm.h Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] pagewalk: seperate function pointers from iterator data Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08 20:34 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2019-08-09 8:57 ` Steven Price
2019-08-08 15:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] pagewalk: use lockdep_assert_held for locking validation Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08 18:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-08 17:50 ` cleanup the walk_page_range interface Linus Torvalds
2019-08-08 21:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08 22:21 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2019-08-09 14:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-12 6:17 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-08-16 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 11:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-16 12:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-08-16 21:06 ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-17 6:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-17 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-17 6:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-17 7:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-08-23 13:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-23 15:36 ` Steven Price
2019-08-24 22:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-27 1:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-27 23:34 ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-27 23:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-28 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-28 13:23 ` Steven Price [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a0e8f03-d1c6-9325-1db3-2c3e2fd0f7d5@arm.com \
--to=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=thomas@shipmail.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).