[PATCH] kdump: Write a correct address of mem_section into vmcoreinfo

[PATCH] kdump: Write a correct address of mem_section into vmcoreinfo

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

Depending on configuration mem_section can now be an array or a pointer
to an array allocated dynamically. In most cases, we can continue to refer
to it as 'mem_section' regardless of what it is.

But there's one exception: '&mem_section' means "address of the array" if
mem_section is an array, but if mem_section is a pointer, it would mean
"address of the pointer".

We've stepped onto this in kdump code. VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(mem_section)
writes down address of pointer into vmcoreinfo, not array as we wanted.

Let's introduce VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL_ARRAY() that would handle the
situation correctly for both cases.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 83e3c48729d9 ("mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/crash_core.h | 2 ++
 kernel/crash_core.c        | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/crash_core.h b/include/linux/crash_core.h
index 06097ef30449..b511f6d24b42 100644
--- a/include/linux/crash_core.h
+++ b/include/linux/crash_core.h
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ phys_addr_t paddr_vmcoreinfo_note(void);
 	vmcoreinfo_append_str("PAGESIZE=%ld\n", value)
 #define VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(name) \
 	vmcoreinfo_append_str("SYMBOL(%s)=%lx\n", #name, (unsigned long)&name)
+#define VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL_ARRAY(name) \
+	vmcoreinfo_append_str("SYMBOL(%s)=%lx\n", #name, (unsigned long)name)
 #define VMCOREINFO_SIZE(name) \
 	vmcoreinfo_append_str("SIZE(%s)=%lu\n", #name, \
 			      (unsigned long)sizeof(name))
diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
index b3663896278e..4f63597c824d 100644
--- a/kernel/crash_core.c
+++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int __init crash_save_vmcoreinfo_init(void)
 	VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(contig_page_data);
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
-	VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(mem_section);
+	VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL_ARRAY(mem_section);
 	VMCOREINFO_LENGTH(mem_section, NR_SECTION_ROOTS);
 	VMCOREINFO_STRUCT_SIZE(mem_section);
 	VMCOREINFO_OFFSET(mem_section, section_mem_map);
-- 
2.15.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH] kdump: Write a correct address of mem_section into vmcoreinfo

[Ingo Molnar]

* Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Depending on configuration mem_section can now be an array or a pointer
> to an array allocated dynamically. In most cases, we can continue to refer
> to it as 'mem_section' regardless of what it is.
> 
> But there's one exception: '&mem_section' means "address of the array" if
> mem_section is an array, but if mem_section is a pointer, it would mean
> "address of the pointer".
> 
> We've stepped onto this in kdump code. VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(mem_section)
> writes down address of pointer into vmcoreinfo, not array as we wanted.
> 
> Let's introduce VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL_ARRAY() that would handle the
> situation correctly for both cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: 83e3c48729d9 ("mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>

You forgot the Reported-by - I added that to the commit.

Thanks,

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH] kdump: Write a correct address of mem_section into vmcoreinfo

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:48:38AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Depending on configuration mem_section can now be an array or a pointer
> > to an array allocated dynamically. In most cases, we can continue to refer
> > to it as 'mem_section' regardless of what it is.
> > 
> > But there's one exception: '&mem_section' means "address of the array" if
> > mem_section is an array, but if mem_section is a pointer, it would mean
> > "address of the pointer".
> > 
> > We've stepped onto this in kdump code. VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(mem_section)
> > writes down address of pointer into vmcoreinfo, not array as we wanted.
> > 
> > Let's introduce VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL_ARRAY() that would handle the
> > situation correctly for both cases.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > Fixes: 83e3c48729d9 ("mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > Acked-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> 
> You forgot the Reported-by - I added that to the commit.

Oops, sorry.

Note, that Andrew has already pick it up and sent it upstream.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>