linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: pkeys on POWER: Access rights not reset on execve
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 07:01:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180604140135.GA10088@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e53b91f-80a7-816a-3e9b-56d7be7cd092@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:12:07PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 06/03/2018 10:18 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> >On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 01:29:11PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>On 05/20/2018 09:11 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> >>>Florian,
> >>>
> >>>	Does the following patch fix the problem for you?  Just like x86
> >>>	I am enabling all keys in the UAMOR register during
> >>>	initialization itself. Hence any key created by any thread at
> >>>	any time, will get activated on all threads. So any thread
> >>>	can change the permission on that key. Smoke tested it
> >>>	with your test program.
> >>
> >>I think this goes in the right direction, but the AMR value after
> >>fork is still strange:
> >>
> >>AMR (PID 34912): 0x0000000000000000
> >>AMR after fork (PID 34913): 0x0000000000000000
> >>AMR (PID 34913): 0x0000000000000000
> >>Allocated key in subprocess (PID 34913): 2
> >>Allocated key (PID 34912): 2
> >>Setting AMR: 0xffffffffffffffff
> >>New AMR value (PID 34912): 0x0fffffffffffffff
> >>About to call execl (PID 34912) ...
> >>AMR (PID 34912): 0x0fffffffffffffff
> >>AMR after fork (PID 34914): 0x0000000000000003
> >>AMR (PID 34914): 0x0000000000000003
> >>Allocated key in subprocess (PID 34914): 2
> >>Allocated key (PID 34912): 2
> >>Setting AMR: 0xffffffffffffffff
> >>New AMR value (PID 34912): 0x0fffffffffffffff
> >>
> >>I mean this line:
> >>
> >>AMR after fork (PID 34914): 0x0000000000000003
> >>
> >>Shouldn't it be the same as in the parent process?
> >
> >Fixed it. Please try this patch. If it all works to your satisfaction, I
> >will clean it up further and send to Michael Ellermen(ppc maintainer).
> >
> >
> >commit 51f4208ed5baeab1edb9b0f8b68d7144449b3527
> >Author: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
> >Date:   Sun Jun 3 14:44:32 2018 -0500
> >
> >     Fix for the fork bug.
> >     Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
> 
> Is this on top of the previous patch, or a separate fix?

top of previous patch.
RP

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-04 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-18 14:27 pkeys on POWER: Access rights not reset on execve Florian Weimer
2018-05-19  1:19 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-19  1:50   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-19  5:26     ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 20:27     ` Ram Pai
2018-05-19 23:47       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-20  6:04         ` Ram Pai
2018-05-20  6:06           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-20 19:11             ` Ram Pai
2018-05-21 11:29               ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-03 20:18                 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 10:12                   ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-04 14:01                     ` Ram Pai [this message]
2018-06-04 17:57                       ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-04 19:02                         ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 21:00                           ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08  2:34                             ` Ram Pai
2018-06-08  5:53                               ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 10:15                                 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 10:44                                   ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 12:54                                     ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 12:57                                       ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 13:49                                         ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 13:51                                           ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 14:17                                             ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-11 17:23                                 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-11 17:29                                   ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-11 20:08                                     ` Ram Pai
2018-06-12 12:17                                       ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19  5:12   ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 11:11   ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180604140135.GA10088@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com \
    --to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).