linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, jmattson@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	rkrcmar@redhat.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com
Subject: Re: [kvm PATCH v4 0/2] use vmalloc to allocate vmx vcpus
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 05:29:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181026122948.GQ25444@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181026075900.111462-1-marcorr@google.com>

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:58:58AM -0700, Marc Orr wrote:
> A couple of patches to allocate vmx vcpus with vmalloc instead of
> kalloc, which enables vcpu allocation to succeeed when contiguous
> physical memory is sparse.

A question that may have been asked already, but if so I didn't see it ...
does kvm_vcpu need to be so damn big?  It's 22kB with the random .config
I happen to have (which gets rounded to 32kB, an order-3 allocation).  If
we can knock 6kB off it (either by allocating pieces separately), it becomes
an order-2 allocation.  So, biggest chunks:

        struct kvm_vcpu_arch       arch;                 /*   576 21568 */

        struct kvm_mmu             mmu;                  /*   336   400 */
        struct kvm_mmu             nested_mmu;           /*   736   400 */
        struct fpu                 user_fpu;             /*  2176  4160 */
        struct fpu                 guest_fpu;            /*  6336  4160 */
        struct kvm_cpuid_entry2    cpuid_entries[80];    /* 10580  3200 */
        struct x86_emulate_ctxt    emulate_ctxt;         /* 13792  2656 */
        struct kvm_pmu             pmu;                  /* 17344  1520 */
        struct kvm_vcpu_hv         hyperv;               /* 18872  1872 */
                gfn_t              gfns[64];             /* 20832   512 */

that's about 19kB of the 22kB right there.  Can any of them be shrunk
in size or allocated separately?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-26 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-26  7:58 [kvm PATCH v4 0/2] use vmalloc to allocate vmx vcpus Marc Orr
2018-10-26  7:58 ` [kvm PATCH v4 1/2] kvm: vmx: refactor vmx_msrs struct for vmalloc Marc Orr
2018-10-26 11:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-10-26  7:59 ` [kvm PATCH v4 2/2] kvm: vmx: use vmalloc() to allocate vcpus Marc Orr
2018-10-26 12:29 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-10-26 14:45   ` [kvm PATCH v4 0/2] use vmalloc to allocate vmx vcpus Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-26 14:49     ` Dave Hansen
2018-10-31 13:06       ` Marc Orr
2018-10-29  1:58 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-10-29 16:25   ` Jim Mattson
2018-10-29 16:48     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-29 18:12       ` Jim Mattson
2018-10-29 19:16         ` Marc Orr
2018-10-29 19:22           ` Marc Orr
2018-10-31 13:17       ` Marc Orr
2018-10-31 13:27         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-31 13:48           ` Marc Orr
2018-10-31 14:21             ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-31 21:19               ` Marc Orr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181026122948.GQ25444@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=marcorr@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).