[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 55/60] mm/kmemleak.c: fix check for softirq context

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 55/60] mm/kmemleak.c: fix check for softirq context

[Sasha Levin]

From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 6ef9056952532c3b746de46aa10d45b4d7797bd8 ]

in_softirq() is a wrong predicate to check if we are in a softirq
context.  It also returns true if we have BH disabled, so objects are
falsely stamped with "softirq" comm.  The correct predicate is
in_serving_softirq().

If user does cat from /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak previously they would
see this, which is clearly wrong, this is system call context (see the
comm):

unreferenced object 0xffff88805bd661c0 (size 64):
  comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294942959 (age 12.400s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00  ................
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<0000000007dcb30c>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:55 [inline]
    [<0000000007dcb30c>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:439 [inline]
    [<0000000007dcb30c>] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3326 [inline]
    [<0000000007dcb30c>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x13d/0x280 mm/slab.c:3553
    [<00000000969722b7>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:547 [inline]
    [<00000000969722b7>] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:742 [inline]
    [<00000000969722b7>] ip_mc_add1_src net/ipv4/igmp.c:1961 [inline]
    [<00000000969722b7>] ip_mc_add_src+0x36b/0x400 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2085
    [<00000000a4134b5f>] ip_mc_msfilter+0x22d/0x310 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2475
    [<00000000d20248ad>] do_ip_setsockopt.isra.0+0x19fe/0x1c00 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:957
    [<000000003d367be7>] ip_setsockopt+0x3b/0xb0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1246
    [<000000003c7c76af>] udp_setsockopt+0x4e/0x90 net/ipv4/udp.c:2616
    [<000000000c1aeb23>] sock_common_setsockopt+0x3e/0x50 net/core/sock.c:3130
    [<000000000157b92b>] __sys_setsockopt+0x9e/0x120 net/socket.c:2078
    [<00000000a9f3d058>] __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2089 [inline]
    [<00000000a9f3d058>] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2086 [inline]
    [<00000000a9f3d058>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x26/0x30 net/socket.c:2086
    [<000000001b8da885>] do_syscall_64+0x7c/0x1a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
    [<00000000ba770c62>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

now they will see this:

unreferenced object 0xffff88805413c800 (size 64):
  comm "syz-executor.4", pid 8960, jiffies 4294994003 (age 14.350s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 7a 8a 57 80 88 ff ff e0 00 00 01 00 00 00 00  .z.W............
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<00000000c5d3be64>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:55 [inline]
    [<00000000c5d3be64>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:439 [inline]
    [<00000000c5d3be64>] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3326 [inline]
    [<00000000c5d3be64>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x13d/0x280 mm/slab.c:3553
    [<0000000023865be2>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:547 [inline]
    [<0000000023865be2>] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:742 [inline]
    [<0000000023865be2>] ip_mc_add1_src net/ipv4/igmp.c:1961 [inline]
    [<0000000023865be2>] ip_mc_add_src+0x36b/0x400 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2085
    [<000000003029a9d4>] ip_mc_msfilter+0x22d/0x310 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2475
    [<00000000ccd0a87c>] do_ip_setsockopt.isra.0+0x19fe/0x1c00 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:957
    [<00000000a85a3785>] ip_setsockopt+0x3b/0xb0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1246
    [<00000000ec13c18d>] udp_setsockopt+0x4e/0x90 net/ipv4/udp.c:2616
    [<0000000052d748e3>] sock_common_setsockopt+0x3e/0x50 net/core/sock.c:3130
    [<00000000512f1014>] __sys_setsockopt+0x9e/0x120 net/socket.c:2078
    [<00000000181758bc>] __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2089 [inline]
    [<00000000181758bc>] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2086 [inline]
    [<00000000181758bc>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x26/0x30 net/socket.c:2086
    [<00000000d4b73623>] do_syscall_64+0x7c/0x1a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
    [<00000000c1098bec>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190517171507.96046-1-dvyukov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 mm/kmemleak.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index 71ba1c7f8892..d779181bed4d 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static struct kmemleak_object *create_object(unsigned long ptr, size_t size,
 	if (in_irq()) {
 		object->pid = 0;
 		strncpy(object->comm, "hardirq", sizeof(object->comm));
-	} else if (in_softirq()) {
+	} else if (in_serving_softirq()) {
 		object->pid = 0;
 		strncpy(object->comm, "softirq", sizeof(object->comm));
 	} else {
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 57/60] mm/gup.c: mark undo_dev_pagemap as __maybe_unused

[Sasha Levin]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

[ Upstream commit 790c73690c2bbecb3f6f8becbdb11ddc9bcff8cc ]

Several mips builds generate the following build warning.

  mm/gup.c:1788:13: warning: 'undo_dev_pagemap' defined but not used

The function is declared unconditionally but only called from behind
various ifdefs. Mark it __maybe_unused.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1562072523-22311-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 mm/gup.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index babcbd6d99c3..cee599d1692c 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -1364,7 +1364,8 @@ static inline pte_t gup_get_pte(pte_t *ptep)
 }
 #endif
 
-static void undo_dev_pagemap(int *nr, int nr_start, struct page **pages)
+static void __maybe_unused undo_dev_pagemap(int *nr, int nr_start,
+					    struct page **pages)
 {
 	while ((*nr) - nr_start) {
 		struct page *page = pages[--(*nr)];
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 58/60] mm/gup.c: remove some BUG_ONs from get_gate_page()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit b5d1c39f34d1c9bca0c4b9ae2e339fbbe264a9c7 ]

If we end up without a PGD or PUD entry backing the gate area, don't BUG
-- just fail gracefully.

It's not entirely implausible that this could happen some day on x86.  It
doesn't right now even with an execute-only emulated vsyscall page because
the fixmap shares the PUD, but the core mm code shouldn't rely on that
particular detail to avoid OOPSing.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a1d9f4efb75b9d464e59fd6af00104b21c58f6f7.1561610798.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 mm/gup.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index cee599d1692c..12b9626b1a9e 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -442,11 +442,14 @@ static int get_gate_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 		pgd = pgd_offset_k(address);
 	else
 		pgd = pgd_offset_gate(mm, address);
-	BUG_ON(pgd_none(*pgd));
+	if (pgd_none(*pgd))
+		return -EFAULT;
 	p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, address);
-	BUG_ON(p4d_none(*p4d));
+	if (p4d_none(*p4d))
+		return -EFAULT;
 	pud = pud_offset(p4d, address);
-	BUG_ON(pud_none(*pud));
+	if (pud_none(*pud))
+		return -EFAULT;
 	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
 	if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
 		return -EFAULT;
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 59/60] mm/mmu_notifier: use hlist_add_head_rcu()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>

[ Upstream commit 543bdb2d825fe2400d6e951f1786d92139a16931 ]

Make mmu_notifier_register() safer by issuing a memory barrier before
registering a new notifier.  This fixes a theoretical bug on weakly
ordered CPUs.  For example, take this simplified use of notifiers by a
driver:

	my_struct->mn.ops = &my_ops; /* (1) */
	mmu_notifier_register(&my_struct->mn, mm)
		...
		hlist_add_head(&mn->hlist, &mm->mmu_notifiers); /* (2) */
		...

Once mmu_notifier_register() releases the mm locks, another thread can
invalidate a range:

	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range()
		...
		hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, &mm->mmu_notifiers, hlist) {
			if (mn->ops->invalidate_range)

The read side relies on the data dependency between mn and ops to ensure
that the pointer is properly initialized.  But the write side doesn't have
any dependency between (1) and (2), so they could be reordered and the
readers could dereference an invalid mn->ops.  mmu_notifier_register()
does take all the mm locks before adding to the hlist, but those have
acquire semantics which isn't sufficient.

By calling hlist_add_head_rcu() instead of hlist_add_head() we update the
hlist using a store-release, ensuring that readers see prior
initialization of my_struct.  This situation is better illustated by
litmus test MP+onceassign+derefonce.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190502133532.24981-1-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com
Fixes: cddb8a5c14aa ("mmu-notifiers: core")
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 mm/mmu_notifier.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
index 314285284e6e..70d0efb06374 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 	 * thanks to mm_take_all_locks().
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->lock);
-	hlist_add_head(&mn->hlist, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list);
+	hlist_add_head_rcu(&mn->hlist, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list);
 	spin_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->lock);
 
 	mm_drop_all_locks(mm);
-- 
2.20.1