linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Miguel de Dios <migueldedios@google.com>,
	Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: release the spinlock on zap_pte_range
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:45:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190729074523.GC9330@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190729071037.241581-1-minchan@kernel.org>

On Mon 29-07-19 16:10:37, Minchan Kim wrote:
> In our testing(carmera recording), Miguel and Wei found unmap_page_range
> takes above 6ms with preemption disabled easily. When I see that, the
> reason is it holds page table spinlock during entire 512 page operation
> in a PMD. 6.2ms is never trivial for user experince if RT task couldn't
> run in the time because it could make frame drop or glitch audio problem.

Where is the time spent during the tear down? 512 pages doesn't sound
like a lot to tear down. Is it the TLB flushing?

> This patch adds preemption point like coyp_pte_range.
> 
> Reported-by: Miguel de Dios <migueldedios@google.com>
> Reported-by: Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 2e796372927fd..bc3e0c5e4f89b 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1007,6 +1007,7 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  				struct zap_details *details)
>  {
>  	struct mm_struct *mm = tlb->mm;
> +	int progress = 0;
>  	int force_flush = 0;
>  	int rss[NR_MM_COUNTERS];
>  	spinlock_t *ptl;
> @@ -1022,7 +1023,16 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  	flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
>  	arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
>  	do {
> -		pte_t ptent = *pte;
> +		pte_t ptent;
> +
> +		if (progress >= 32) {
> +			progress = 0;
> +			if (need_resched())
> +				break;
> +		}
> +		progress += 8;

Why 8?

> +
> +		ptent = *pte;
>  		if (pte_none(ptent))
>  			continue;
>  
> @@ -1123,8 +1133,11 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  	if (force_flush) {
>  		force_flush = 0;
>  		tlb_flush_mmu(tlb);
> -		if (addr != end)
> -			goto again;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (addr != end) {
> +		progress = 0;
> +		goto again;
>  	}
>  
>  	return addr;
> -- 
> 2.22.0.709.g102302147b-goog

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-29  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-29  7:10 [PATCH] mm: release the spinlock on zap_pte_range Minchan Kim
2019-07-29  7:45 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-07-29  8:20   ` Minchan Kim
2019-07-29  8:35     ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 12:11       ` Minchan Kim
2019-07-30 12:32         ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 12:39           ` Minchan Kim
2019-07-30 12:57             ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31  5:44               ` Minchan Kim
2019-07-31  7:21                 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 10:55                   ` Minchan Kim
2019-08-09 12:43                     ` [RFC PATCH] mm: drop mark_page_access from the unmap path Michal Hocko
2019-08-09 17:57                       ` Mel Gorman
2019-08-09 18:34                       ` Johannes Weiner
2019-08-12  8:09                         ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-12 15:07                           ` Johannes Weiner
2019-08-13 10:51                             ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-26 12:06                               ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-27 16:00                                 ` Johannes Weiner
2019-08-27 18:41                                   ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 19:42     ` [PATCH] mm: release the spinlock on zap_pte_range Andrew Morton
2019-07-31  6:14       ` Minchan Kim
2019-08-06  7:05 ` [mm] 755d6edc1a: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -4.1% regression kernel test robot
     [not found]   ` <20190806080415.GG11812@dhcp22.suse.cz>
2019-08-06 11:00     ` Minchan Kim
2019-08-06 11:11       ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190729074523.GC9330@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=migueldedios@google.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=wvw@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).