From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Henry Burns <henrywolfeburns@gmail.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@thunk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] zram: use common zpool interface
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:47:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191014104717.GA43868@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191010232030.af6444879413e76a780cd27e@gmail.com>
On (10/10/19 23:20), Vitaly Wool wrote:
[..]
> static const char *default_compressor = "lzo-rle";
>
> +#define BACKEND_PAR_BUF_SIZE 32
> +static char backend_par_buf[BACKEND_PAR_BUF_SIZE];
We can have multiple zram devices (zram0 .. zramN), I guess it
would make sense not to force all devices to use one particular
allocator (e.g. see comp_algorithm_store()).
If the motivation for the patch set is that zsmalloc does not
perform equally well for various data access patterns, then the
same is true for any other allocator. Thus, I think, we need to
have a per-device 'allocator' knob.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-14 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 20:04 [PATCH 0/3] Allow ZRAM to use any zpool-compatible backend Vitaly Wool
2019-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] zpool: extend API to match zsmalloc Vitaly Wool
2019-10-18 11:23 ` Dan Streetman
2019-10-10 20:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] zsmalloc: add compaction and huge class callbacks Vitaly Wool
2019-10-14 10:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-10-10 20:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] zram: use common zpool interface Vitaly Wool
2019-10-14 10:47 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2019-10-14 11:52 ` Vitaly Wool
2019-10-15 2:04 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-10-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 0/3] Allow ZRAM to use any zpool-compatible backend Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-10-14 11:49 ` Vitaly Wool
2019-10-14 16:41 ` Minchan Kim
2019-10-14 16:50 ` Vitaly Wool
2019-10-15 7:39 ` Vitaly Wool
2019-10-15 20:00 ` Minchan Kim
2019-10-21 14:21 ` Vitaly Wool
2019-10-30 0:10 ` Minchan Kim
2019-11-13 15:54 ` Vitaly Wool
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-14 13:49 [PATCH 0/3] allow zram to use zbud as underlying allocator Vitaly Wool
2015-09-14 13:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] zram: use common zpool interface Vitaly Wool
2015-09-15 1:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-09-15 6:03 ` Dan Streetman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191014104717.GA43868@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
--cc=henrywolfeburns@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tytso@thunk.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vitalywool@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).