[GIT PULL] percpu changes for v5.5-rc1

* [GIT PULL] percpu changes for v5.5-rc1
@ 2019-12-02 19:26 Dennis Zhou
  2019-12-03 17:30 ` pr-tracker-bot
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dennis Zhou @ 2019-12-02 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: Tejun Heo, Christoph Lameter, linux-mm, linux-kernel

Hi Linus,

This pull request has a change to fix percpu-refcount for RT kernels
because rcu-sched disables preemption and the refcount release callback
might acquire a spinlock.

In the works is to add memcg counting for percpu by Roman Gushchin. That
may land in either for-5.6 or for-5.7. There is also some sparse
warnings that we're sorting out now.

Thanks,
Dennis

The following changes since commit 4f5cafb5cb8471e54afdc9054d973535614f7675:

  Linux 5.4-rc3 (2019-10-13 16:37:36 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dennis/percpu.git for-5.5

for you to fetch changes up to ba30e27405afa0b13b79532a345977b3e58ad501:

  Revert "percpu: add __percpu to SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR" (2019-11-25 14:28:04 -0800)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Dooks (1):
      percpu: add __percpu to SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR

Dennis Zhou (1):
      Revert "percpu: add __percpu to SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR"

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (1):
      percpu-refcount: Use normal instead of RCU-sched"

 include/linux/percpu-refcount.h | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
index 7aef0abc194a..390031e816dc 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
@@ -186,14 +186,14 @@ static inline void percpu_ref_get_many(struct percpu_ref *ref, unsigned long nr)
 {
 	unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count;
 
-	rcu_read_lock_sched();
+	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	if (__ref_is_percpu(ref, &percpu_count))
 		this_cpu_add(*percpu_count, nr);
 	else
 		atomic_long_add(nr, &ref->count);
 
-	rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 /**
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget(struct percpu_ref *ref)
 	unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count;
 	bool ret;
 
-	rcu_read_lock_sched();
+	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	if (__ref_is_percpu(ref, &percpu_count)) {
 		this_cpu_inc(*percpu_count);
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget(struct percpu_ref *ref)
 		ret = atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&ref->count);
 	}
 
-	rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget_live(struct percpu_ref *ref)
 	unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count;
 	bool ret = false;
 
-	rcu_read_lock_sched();
+	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	if (__ref_is_percpu(ref, &percpu_count)) {
 		this_cpu_inc(*percpu_count);
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget_live(struct percpu_ref *ref)
 		ret = atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&ref->count);
 	}
 
-	rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -285,14 +285,14 @@ static inline void percpu_ref_put_many(struct percpu_ref *ref, unsigned long nr)
 {
 	unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count;
 
-	rcu_read_lock_sched();
+	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	if (__ref_is_percpu(ref, &percpu_count))
 		this_cpu_sub(*percpu_count, nr);
 	else if (unlikely(atomic_long_sub_and_test(nr, &ref->count)))
 		ref->release(ref);
 
-	rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 /**


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread