linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: socket: implement SO_DESCRIPTION
       [not found] <20200815182344.7469-3-kalou@tfz.net>
@ 2020-08-16  5:02 ` kernel test robot
  2020-08-16  7:33 ` kernel test robot
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-08-16  5:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pascal Bouchareine, linux-kernel
  Cc: kbuild-all, Pascal Bouchareine, linux-api, netdev,
	Jakub Kicinski, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List,
	Alexey Dobriyan, Al Viro

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6492 bytes --]

Hi Pascal,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on tip/perf/core]
[also build test WARNING on linux/master v5.8]
[cannot apply to security/next-testing linus/master next-20200814]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pascal-Bouchareine/proc-socket-attach-description-to-sockets/20200816-090222
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git d903b6d029d66e6478562d75ea18d89098f7b7e8
config: m68k-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=m68k 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from arch/m68k/include/asm/io_mm.h:25,
                    from arch/m68k/include/asm/io.h:8,
                    from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9,
                    from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:11,
                    from include/linux/skbuff.h:31,
                    from include/linux/ip.h:16,
                    from include/net/ip.h:22,
                    from include/linux/errqueue.h:6,
                    from net/core/sock.c:91:
   arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h: In function 'raw_rom_outsb':
   arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:83:7: warning: variable '__w' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
      83 |  ({u8 __w, __v = (b);  u32 _addr = ((u32) (addr)); \
         |       ^~~
   arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:430:3: note: in expansion of macro 'rom_out_8'
     430 |   rom_out_8(port, *buf++);
         |   ^~~~~~~~~
   arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h: In function 'raw_rom_outsw':
   arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:86:8: warning: variable '__w' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
      86 |  ({u16 __w, __v = (w); u32 _addr = ((u32) (addr)); \
         |        ^~~
   arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:448:3: note: in expansion of macro 'rom_out_be16'
     448 |   rom_out_be16(port, *buf++);
         |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h: In function 'raw_rom_outsw_swapw':
   arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:90:8: warning: variable '__w' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
      90 |  ({u16 __w, __v = (w); u32 _addr = ((u32) (addr)); \
         |        ^~~
   arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:466:3: note: in expansion of macro 'rom_out_le16'
     466 |   rom_out_le16(port, *buf++);
         |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:11,
                    from include/linux/unaligned/access_ok.h:5,
                    from arch/m68k/include/asm/unaligned.h:18,
                    from net/core/sock.c:88:
   include/linux/scatterlist.h: In function 'sg_set_buf':
   arch/m68k/include/asm/page_mm.h:169:49: warning: ordered comparison of pointer with null pointer [-Wextra]
     169 | #define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) ((void *)(kaddr) >= (void *)PAGE_OFFSET && (void *)(kaddr) < high_memory)
         |                                                 ^~
   include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
      78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
         |                                          ^
   include/linux/scatterlist.h:143:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUG_ON'
     143 |  BUG_ON(!virt_addr_valid(buf));
         |  ^~~~~~
   include/linux/scatterlist.h:143:10: note: in expansion of macro 'virt_addr_valid'
     143 |  BUG_ON(!virt_addr_valid(buf));
         |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from arch/m68k/include/asm/bug.h:32,
                    from include/linux/bug.h:5,
                    from include/linux/thread_info.h:12,
                    from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5,
                    from ./arch/m68k/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1,
                    from include/linux/preempt.h:78,
                    from include/linux/spinlock.h:51,
                    from include/linux/seqlock.h:36,
                    from include/linux/time.h:6,
                    from include/linux/skbuff.h:15,
                    from include/linux/ip.h:16,
                    from include/net/ip.h:22,
                    from include/linux/errqueue.h:6,
                    from net/core/sock.c:91:
   include/linux/dma-mapping.h: In function 'dma_map_resource':
   arch/m68k/include/asm/page_mm.h:169:49: warning: ordered comparison of pointer with null pointer [-Wextra]
     169 | #define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) ((void *)(kaddr) >= (void *)PAGE_OFFSET && (void *)(kaddr) < high_memory)
         |                                                 ^~
   include/asm-generic/bug.h:144:27: note: in definition of macro 'WARN_ON_ONCE'
     144 |  int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition);   \
         |                           ^~~~~~~~~
   arch/m68k/include/asm/page_mm.h:170:25: note: in expansion of macro 'virt_addr_valid'
     170 | #define pfn_valid(pfn)  virt_addr_valid(pfn_to_virt(pfn))
         |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/dma-mapping.h:352:19: note: in expansion of macro 'pfn_valid'
     352 |  if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pfn_valid(PHYS_PFN(phys_addr))))
         |                   ^~~~~~~~~
   net/core/sock.c: At top level:
>> net/core/sock.c:831:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'sock_set_description' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     831 | int sock_set_description(struct sock *sk, char __user *user_desc)
         |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

vim +/sock_set_description +831 net/core/sock.c

   830	
 > 831	int sock_set_description(struct sock *sk, char __user *user_desc)
   832	{
   833		char *old, *desc;
   834	
   835		desc = strndup_user(user_desc, SK_MAX_DESC_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
   836		if (IS_ERR(desc))
   837			return PTR_ERR(desc);
   838	
   839		lock_sock(sk);
   840		old = sk->sk_description;
   841		sk->sk_description = desc;
   842		release_sock(sk);
   843	
   844		kfree(old);
   845	
   846		return 0;
   847	}
   848	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 57233 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: socket: implement SO_DESCRIPTION
       [not found] <20200815182344.7469-3-kalou@tfz.net>
  2020-08-16  5:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: socket: implement SO_DESCRIPTION kernel test robot
@ 2020-08-16  7:33 ` kernel test robot
  2020-08-16  7:33 ` [RFC PATCH] net: socket: sock_set_description() can be static kernel test robot
  2020-08-16  9:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: socket: implement SO_DESCRIPTION kernel test robot
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-08-16  7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pascal Bouchareine, linux-kernel
  Cc: kbuild-all, Pascal Bouchareine, linux-api, netdev,
	Jakub Kicinski, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List,
	Alexey Dobriyan, Al Viro

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1951 bytes --]

Hi Pascal,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on tip/perf/core]
[also build test WARNING on linux/master v5.8]
[cannot apply to security/next-testing linus/master next-20200814]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pascal-Bouchareine/proc-socket-attach-description-to-sockets/20200816-090222
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git d903b6d029d66e6478562d75ea18d89098f7b7e8
config: i386-randconfig-s002-20200816 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.2-168-g9554805c-dirty
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=i386 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> net/core/sock.c:831:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_set_description' was not declared. Should it be static?
   net/core/sock.c:2028:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'sk_clone_lock' - wrong count at exit
   net/core/sock.c:2032:6: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'sk_free_unlock_clone' - unexpected unlock
   net/core/sock.c:3117:6: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'lock_sock_fast' - different lock contexts for basic block
   net/core/sock.c:3611:13: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'proto_seq_start' - wrong count at exit
   net/core/sock.c:3623:13: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'proto_seq_stop' - wrong count at exit

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 28617 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [RFC PATCH] net: socket: sock_set_description() can be static
       [not found] <20200815182344.7469-3-kalou@tfz.net>
  2020-08-16  5:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: socket: implement SO_DESCRIPTION kernel test robot
  2020-08-16  7:33 ` kernel test robot
@ 2020-08-16  7:33 ` kernel test robot
  2020-08-16  9:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: socket: implement SO_DESCRIPTION kernel test robot
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-08-16  7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pascal Bouchareine, linux-kernel
  Cc: kbuild-all, Pascal Bouchareine, linux-api, netdev,
	Jakub Kicinski, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List,
	Alexey Dobriyan, Al Viro


Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
 sock.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 2cb44a0e38b77d..f145a710974b48 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ void sock_set_rcvbuf(struct sock *sk, int val)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_set_rcvbuf);
 
-int sock_set_description(struct sock *sk, char __user *user_desc)
+static int sock_set_description(struct sock *sk, char __user *user_desc)
 {
 	char *old, *desc;
 


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: socket: implement SO_DESCRIPTION
       [not found] <20200815182344.7469-3-kalou@tfz.net>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-08-16  7:33 ` [RFC PATCH] net: socket: sock_set_description() can be static kernel test robot
@ 2020-08-16  9:00 ` kernel test robot
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-08-16  9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pascal Bouchareine, linux-kernel
  Cc: kbuild-all, clang-built-linux, Pascal Bouchareine, linux-api,
	netdev, Jakub Kicinski, Andrew Morton,
	Linux Memory Management List, Alexey Dobriyan, Al Viro

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2443 bytes --]

Hi Pascal,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on tip/perf/core]
[also build test WARNING on linux/master v5.8]
[cannot apply to security/next-testing linus/master next-20200814]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pascal-Bouchareine/proc-socket-attach-description-to-sockets/20200816-090222
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git d903b6d029d66e6478562d75ea18d89098f7b7e8
config: x86_64-randconfig-r006-20200816 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab9fc8bae805c785066779e76e7846aabad5609e)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> net/core/sock.c:831:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'sock_set_description' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   int sock_set_description(struct sock *sk, char __user *user_desc)
       ^
   net/core/sock.c:831:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
   int sock_set_description(struct sock *sk, char __user *user_desc)
   ^
   static 
   1 warning generated.

vim +/sock_set_description +831 net/core/sock.c

   830	
 > 831	int sock_set_description(struct sock *sk, char __user *user_desc)
   832	{
   833		char *old, *desc;
   834	
   835		desc = strndup_user(user_desc, SK_MAX_DESC_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
   836		if (IS_ERR(desc))
   837			return PTR_ERR(desc);
   838	
   839		lock_sock(sk);
   840		old = sk->sk_description;
   841		sk->sk_description = desc;
   842		release_sock(sk);
   843	
   844		kfree(old);
   845	
   846		return 0;
   847	}
   848	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 34280 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-16  9:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20200815182344.7469-3-kalou@tfz.net>
2020-08-16  5:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: socket: implement SO_DESCRIPTION kernel test robot
2020-08-16  7:33 ` kernel test robot
2020-08-16  7:33 ` [RFC PATCH] net: socket: sock_set_description() can be static kernel test robot
2020-08-16  9:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: socket: implement SO_DESCRIPTION kernel test robot

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).