linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
	Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>,
	Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 22/30] x86/cet/shstk: Add user-mode shadow stack support
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 18:57:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210409155711.kxf3fjc7csvqpl33@box.shutemov.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401221104.31584-23-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>

On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 03:10:56PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> Introduce basic shadow stack enabling/disabling/allocation routines.
> A task's shadow stack is allocated from memory with VM_SHADOW_STACK flag
> and has a fixed size of min(RLIMIT_STACK, 4GB).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> v24:
> - Rename cet.c to shstk.c, update related areas accordingly.
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h       |  29 +++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h |   5 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile         |   2 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c          | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..aa85d599b184
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _ASM_X86_CET_H
> +#define _ASM_X86_CET_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct task_struct;
> +/*
> + * Per-thread CET status
> + */
> +struct cet_status {
> +	unsigned long	shstk_base;
> +	unsigned long	shstk_size;
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK
> +int shstk_setup(void);
> +void shstk_free(struct task_struct *p);
> +void shstk_disable(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int shstk_setup(void) { return 0; }
> +static inline void shstk_free(struct task_struct *p) {}
> +static inline void shstk_disable(void) {}
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_X86_CET_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index f1b9ed5efaa9..a5d703fda74e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct vm86;
>  #include <asm/unwind_hints.h>
>  #include <asm/vmxfeatures.h>
>  #include <asm/vdso/processor.h>
> +#include <asm/cet.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/personality.h>
>  #include <linux/cache.h>
> @@ -535,6 +536,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
>  
>  	unsigned int		sig_on_uaccess_err:1;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CET
> +	struct cet_status	cet;
> +#endif
> +
>  	/* Floating point and extended processor state */
>  	struct fpu		fpu;
>  	/*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> index 2ddf08351f0b..0f99b093f350 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER)	+= unwind_frame.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_UNWINDER_GUESS)		+= unwind_guess.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)		+= sev-es.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK)		+= shstk.o
> +
>  ###
>  # 64 bit specific files
>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_64),y)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5406fdf6df3c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * shstk.c - Intel shadow stack support
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Intel Corporation.
> + * Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/mman.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> +#include <linux/compat.h>
> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> +#include <linux/user.h>
> +#include <asm/msr.h>
> +#include <asm/fpu/internal.h>
> +#include <asm/fpu/xstate.h>
> +#include <asm/fpu/types.h>
> +#include <asm/cet.h>
> +
> +static void start_update_msrs(void)
> +{
> +	fpregs_lock();
> +	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD))
> +		__fpregs_load_activate();
> +}
> +
> +static void end_update_msrs(void)
> +{
> +	fpregs_unlock();
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long alloc_shstk(unsigned long size, int flags)
> +{
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> +	unsigned long addr, populate;
> +
> +	/* VM_SHADOW_STACK requires MAP_ANONYMOUS, MAP_PRIVATE */
> +	flags |= MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE;

Looks like all callers has flags == 0. Do I miss something.

> +
> +	mmap_write_lock(mm);
> +	addr = do_mmap(NULL, 0, size, PROT_READ, flags, VM_SHADOW_STACK, 0,
> +		       &populate, NULL);
> +	mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> +
> +	if (populate)
> +		mm_populate(addr, populate);

If all callers pass down flags==0, populate will never happen.

> +
> +	return addr;
> +}
> +
> +int shstk_setup(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long addr, size;
> +	struct cet_status *cet = &current->thread.cet;
> +
> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	size = round_up(min_t(unsigned long long, rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK), SZ_4G), PAGE_SIZE);
> +	addr = alloc_shstk(size, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> +		return PTR_ERR((void *)addr);
> +
> +	cet->shstk_base = addr;
> +	cet->shstk_size = size;
> +
> +	start_update_msrs();
> +	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, addr + size);
> +	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_U_CET, CET_SHSTK_EN);
> +	end_update_msrs();
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void shstk_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	struct cet_status *cet = &tsk->thread.cet;
> +
> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) ||
> +	    !cet->shstk_size ||
> +	    !cet->shstk_base)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!tsk->mm)
> +		return;
> +
> +	while (1) {
> +		int r;
> +
> +		r = vm_munmap(cet->shstk_base, cet->shstk_size);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * vm_munmap() returns -EINTR when mmap_lock is held by
> +		 * something else, and that lock should not be held for a
> +		 * long time.  Retry it for the case.
> +		 */

Hm, no. -EINTR is not about the lock being held by somebody else. The task
got a signal and need to return to userspace.

I have not looked at the rest of the patches yet, but why do you need a
special free path for shadow stack? Why the normal unmap route doesn't
work for you?

> +		if (r == -EINTR) {
> +			cond_resched();
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	cet->shstk_base = 0;
> +	cet->shstk_size = 0;
> +}
> +
> +void shstk_disable(void)
> +{
> +	struct cet_status *cet = &current->thread.cet;
> +	u64 msr_val;
> +
> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) ||
> +	    !cet->shstk_size ||
> +	    !cet->shstk_base)
> +		return;
> +
> +	start_update_msrs();
> +	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_U_CET, msr_val);
> +	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_U_CET, msr_val & ~CET_SHSTK_EN);
> +	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, 0);
> +	end_update_msrs();
> +
> +	shstk_free(current);
> +}
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 
> 

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210401221104.31584-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 01/30] Documentation/x86: Add CET description Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 02/30] x86/cet/shstk: Add Kconfig option for Shadow Stack Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 03/30] x86/cpufeatures: Add CET CPU feature flags for Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET) Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 04/30] x86/cpufeatures: Introduce X86_FEATURE_CET and setup functions Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-09 10:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-09 15:52     ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2021-04-09 17:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-09 23:14         ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2021-04-10  9:29           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 05/30] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce CET MSR and XSAVES supervisor states Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 06/30] x86/cet: Add control-protection fault handler Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 07/30] x86/mm: Remove _PAGE_DIRTY from kernel RO pages Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 08/30] x86/mm: Move pmd_write(), pud_write() up in the file Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 09/30] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_COW Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 10/30] drm/i915/gvt: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_BITS Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 11/30] x86/mm: Update pte_modify for _PAGE_COW Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 12/30] x86/mm: Update ptep_set_wrprotect() and pmdp_set_wrprotect() for transition from _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_COW Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-09 15:07   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 13/30] mm: Introduce VM_SHADOW_STACK for shadow stack memory Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-09 15:10   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 14/30] x86/mm: Shadow Stack page fault error checking Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-09 15:12   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 15/30] x86/mm: Update maybe_mkwrite() for shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-09 15:16   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 16/30] mm: Fixup places that call pte_mkwrite() directly Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-09 15:20   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 17/30] mm: Add guard pages around a shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-09 15:22   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 18/30] mm/mmap: Add shadow stack pages to memory accounting Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-09 15:25   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 19/30] mm: Update can_follow_write_pte() for shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-09 15:31   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 20/30] mm/mprotect: Exclude shadow stack from preserve_write Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-09 15:34   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 21/30] mm: Re-introduce vm_flags to do_mmap() Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 22/30] x86/cet/shstk: Add user-mode shadow stack support Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-09 15:57   ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2021-04-09 23:47     ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 23/30] x86/cet/shstk: Handle thread shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 24/30] x86/cet/shstk: Introduce shadow stack token setup/verify routines Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-06 22:49   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH v24 25/30] x86/cet/shstk: Handle signals for shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-06 22:50   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-07 19:36     ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2021-04-01 22:11 ` [PATCH v24 26/30] ELF: Introduce arch_setup_elf_property() Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:11 ` [PATCH v24 27/30] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:11 ` [PATCH v24 28/30] mm: Move arch_calc_vm_prot_bits() to arch/x86/include/asm/mman.h Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:11 ` [PATCH v24 29/30] mm: Update arch_validate_flags() to include vma anonymous Yu-cheng Yu
2021-04-01 22:11 ` [PATCH v24 30/30] mm: Introduce PROT_SHSTK for shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210409155711.kxf3fjc7csvqpl33@box.shutemov.name \
    --to=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=esyr@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=pengfei.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com \
    --cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).