linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4] mm: hugetlb: fix UAF in hugetlb_handle_userfault
@ 2022-09-24  3:49 Liu Shixin
  2022-09-25 18:28 ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Liu Shixin @ 2022-09-24  3:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu Zixian, Mike Kravetz, Muchun Song, Andrew Morton,
	Sidhartha Kumar, John Hubbard, David Hildenbrand, Kefeng Wang
  Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Liu Shixin

The vma_lock and hugetlb_fault_mutex are dropped before handling
userfault and reacquire them again after handle_userfault(), but
reacquire the vma_lock could lead to UAF[1,2] due to the following
race,

hugetlb_fault
  hugetlb_no_page
    /*unlock vma_lock */
    hugetlb_handle_userfault
      handle_userfault
        /* unlock mm->mmap_lock*/
                                           vm_mmap_pgoff
                                             do_mmap
                                               mmap_region
                                                 munmap_vma_range
                                                   /* clean old vma */
        /* lock vma_lock again  <--- UAF */
    /* unlock vma_lock */

Since the vma_lock will unlock immediately after hugetlb_handle_userfault(),
let's drop the unneeded lock and unlock in hugetlb_handle_userfault() to fix
the issue.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000d5e00a05e834962e@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220921014457.1668-1-liuzixian4@huawei.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+193f9cee8638750b23cf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Liu Zixian <liuzixian4@huawei.com>
Fixes: 1a1aad8a9b7b ("userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: add userfaultfd hugetlb hook")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
---
v1->v2: add reported-by and link [1].
v2->v3: add comment to explain why unlock in hugetlb_no_page.
v3->v4: Rebase on mainline.

 mm/hugetlb.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index e070b8593b37..477e3c2369d2 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -5476,7 +5476,6 @@ static inline vm_fault_t hugetlb_handle_userfault(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 						  unsigned long addr,
 						  unsigned long reason)
 {
-	vm_fault_t ret;
 	u32 hash;
 	struct vm_fault vmf = {
 		.vma = vma,
@@ -5494,18 +5493,14 @@ static inline vm_fault_t hugetlb_handle_userfault(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	};
 
 	/*
-	 * hugetlb_fault_mutex and i_mmap_rwsem must be
-	 * dropped before handling userfault.  Reacquire
-	 * after handling fault to make calling code simpler.
+	 * vma_lock and hugetlb_fault_mutex must be dropped before handling
+	 * userfault. Also mmap_lock will be dropped during handling
+	 * userfault, any vma operation should be careful from here.
 	 */
 	hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, idx);
 	mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
 	i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
-	ret = handle_userfault(&vmf, reason);
-	i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
-	mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
-
-	return ret;
+	return handle_userfault(&vmf, reason);
 }
 
 static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -5523,6 +5518,7 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
 	unsigned long haddr = address & huge_page_mask(h);
 	bool new_page, new_pagecache_page = false;
+	u32 hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, idx);
 
 	/*
 	 * Currently, we are forced to kill the process in the event the
@@ -5533,7 +5529,7 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	if (is_vma_resv_set(vma, HPAGE_RESV_UNMAPPED)) {
 		pr_warn_ratelimited("PID %d killed due to inadequate hugepage pool\n",
 			   current->pid);
-		return ret;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -5550,12 +5546,10 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	page = find_lock_page(mapping, idx);
 	if (!page) {
 		/* Check for page in userfault range */
-		if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) {
-			ret = hugetlb_handle_userfault(vma, mapping, idx,
+		if (userfaultfd_missing(vma))
+			return hugetlb_handle_userfault(vma, mapping, idx,
 						       flags, haddr, address,
 						       VM_UFFD_MISSING);
-			goto out;
-		}
 
 		page = alloc_huge_page(vma, haddr, 0);
 		if (IS_ERR(page)) {
@@ -5615,10 +5609,9 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		if (userfaultfd_minor(vma)) {
 			unlock_page(page);
 			put_page(page);
-			ret = hugetlb_handle_userfault(vma, mapping, idx,
+			return hugetlb_handle_userfault(vma, mapping, idx,
 						       flags, haddr, address,
 						       VM_UFFD_MINOR);
-			goto out;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -5676,6 +5669,8 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 
 	unlock_page(page);
 out:
+	mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
+	i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
 	return ret;
 
 backout:
@@ -5774,11 +5769,13 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 	entry = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
 	/* PTE markers should be handled the same way as none pte */
-	if (huge_pte_none_mostly(entry)) {
-		ret = hugetlb_no_page(mm, vma, mapping, idx, address, ptep,
+	if (huge_pte_none_mostly(entry))
+		/*
+		 * hugetlb_no_page will drop vma lock and hugetlb fault
+		 * mutex internally, which make us return immediately.
+		 */
+		return hugetlb_no_page(mm, vma, mapping, idx, address, ptep,
 				      entry, flags);
-		goto out_mutex;
-	}
 
 	ret = 0;
 
-- 
2.25.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] mm: hugetlb: fix UAF in hugetlb_handle_userfault
  2022-09-24  3:49 [PATCH v4] mm: hugetlb: fix UAF in hugetlb_handle_userfault Liu Shixin
@ 2022-09-25 18:28 ` Andrew Morton
  2022-09-26  6:48   ` Liu Shixin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2022-09-25 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu Shixin
  Cc: Liu Zixian, Mike Kravetz, Muchun Song, Sidhartha Kumar,
	John Hubbard, David Hildenbrand, Kefeng Wang, linux-mm,
	linux-kernel

On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 11:49:05 +0800 Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> wrote:

> The vma_lock and hugetlb_fault_mutex are dropped before handling
> userfault and reacquire them again after handle_userfault(), but
> reacquire the vma_lock could lead to UAF[1,2] due to the following
> race,
> 
> hugetlb_fault
>   hugetlb_no_page
>     /*unlock vma_lock */
>     hugetlb_handle_userfault
>       handle_userfault
>         /* unlock mm->mmap_lock*/
>                                            vm_mmap_pgoff
>                                              do_mmap
>                                                mmap_region
>                                                  munmap_vma_range
>                                                    /* clean old vma */
>         /* lock vma_lock again  <--- UAF */
>     /* unlock vma_lock */
> 
> Since the vma_lock will unlock immediately after hugetlb_handle_userfault(),
> let's drop the unneeded lock and unlock in hugetlb_handle_userfault() to fix
> the issue.
> 

Thanks.  Turns out that porting all the pending material on top of this
change was not a confidence-inspiring activity.  So I ended up merging
your v3.  Please work with Greg on the backporting when he gets on to
it?  Hopefully that will merely involve sending him this v4.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] mm: hugetlb: fix UAF in hugetlb_handle_userfault
  2022-09-25 18:28 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2022-09-26  6:48   ` Liu Shixin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Liu Shixin @ 2022-09-26  6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: Liu Zixian, Mike Kravetz, Muchun Song, Sidhartha Kumar,
	John Hubbard, David Hildenbrand, Kefeng Wang, linux-mm,
	linux-kernel



On 2022/9/26 2:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 11:49:05 +0800 Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> The vma_lock and hugetlb_fault_mutex are dropped before handling
>> userfault and reacquire them again after handle_userfault(), but
>> reacquire the vma_lock could lead to UAF[1,2] due to the following
>> race,
>>
>> hugetlb_fault
>>   hugetlb_no_page
>>     /*unlock vma_lock */
>>     hugetlb_handle_userfault
>>       handle_userfault
>>         /* unlock mm->mmap_lock*/
>>                                            vm_mmap_pgoff
>>                                              do_mmap
>>                                                mmap_region
>>                                                  munmap_vma_range
>>                                                    /* clean old vma */
>>         /* lock vma_lock again  <--- UAF */
>>     /* unlock vma_lock */
>>
>> Since the vma_lock will unlock immediately after hugetlb_handle_userfault(),
>> let's drop the unneeded lock and unlock in hugetlb_handle_userfault() to fix
>> the issue.
>>
> Thanks.  Turns out that porting all the pending material on top of this
> change was not a confidence-inspiring activity.  So I ended up merging
> your v3.  Please work with Greg on the backporting when he gets on to
> it?  Hopefully that will merely involve sending him this v4.
OK, I'll do it.
> .
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-26  6:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-24  3:49 [PATCH v4] mm: hugetlb: fix UAF in hugetlb_handle_userfault Liu Shixin
2022-09-25 18:28 ` Andrew Morton
2022-09-26  6:48   ` Liu Shixin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).