Re: [PATCH v8 03/10] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock

[Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>]

在 2020/4/16 下午11:28, Johannes Weiner 写道:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 04:01:20PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2020/4/15 下午9:42, Alex Shi 写道:
>>> Hi Johannes,
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for point out!
>>>
>>> Charging in __read_swap_cache_async would ask for 3 layers function arguments
>>> pass, that would be a bit ugly. Compare to this, could we move out the
>>> lru_cache add after commit_charge, like ksm copied pages?
>>>
>>> That give a bit extra non lru list time, but the page just only be used only
>>> after add_anon_rmap setting. Could it cause troubles?
>>
>> Hi Johannes & Andrew,
>>
>> Doing lru_cache_add_anon during swapin_readahead can give a very short timing 
>> for possible page reclaiming for these few pages.
>>
>> If we delay these few pages lru adding till after the vm_fault target page 
>> get memcg charging(mem_cgroup_commit_charge) and activate, we could skip the 
>> mem_cgroup_try_charge/commit_charge/cancel_charge process in __read_swap_cache_async().
>> But the cost is maximum SWAP_RA_ORDER_CEILING number pages on each cpu miss
>> page reclaiming in a short time. On the other hand, save the target vm_fault
>> page from reclaiming before activate it during that time.
> 
> The readahead pages surrounding the faulting page might never get
> accessed and pile up to large amounts. Users can also trigger
> non-faulting readahead with MADV_WILLNEED.
> 
> So unfortunately, I don't see a way to keep these pages off the
> LRU. They do need to be reclaimable, or they become a DoS vector.
> 
> I'm currently preparing a small patch series to make swap ownership
> tracking an integral part of memcg and change the swapin charging
> sequence, then you don't have to worry about it. This will also
> unblock Joonsoo's "workingset protection/detection on the anonymous
> LRU list" patch series, since he is blocked on the same problem - he
> needs the correct LRU available at swapin time to process refaults
> correctly. Both of your patch series are already pretty large, they
> shouldn't need to also deal with that.
> 

That sounds great!
BTW, the swapin target page will add into inactive_anon list and then activate
after chaged. that left a minum time slot for this page to be reclaimed.
May better activate it early?

Also I have 2 clean up patches, which may or may not useful for you. will send
it to you. :)

Thanks
Alex