linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Rongwei Wang <rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/5] slub: Make PREEMPT_RT support less convoluted
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:41:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2903a7a4-7ef1-92e0-05df-ef7cf2fa65b1@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YwcqCCJM1oLREWZc@linutronix.de>

On 8/25/22 09:51, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> 
> The slub code already has a few helpers depending on PREEMPT_RT. Add a few
> more and get rid of the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT conditionals all over the place.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> 
> Vlastimil, does it work for you to include this patch in your series? It
> depends now on your series :) It has this USE_LOCKLESS_FAST_PATH() Linus
> asked about so we should be good.

Sure, I'll add it, thanks!

> 
>  mm/slub.c |   56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -104,9 +104,11 @@
>   *   except the stat counters. This is a percpu structure manipulated only by
>   *   the local cpu, so the lock protects against being preempted or interrupted
>   *   by an irq. Fast path operations rely on lockless operations instead.
> - *   On PREEMPT_RT, the local lock does not actually disable irqs (and thus
> - *   prevent the lockless operations), so fastpath operations also need to take
> - *   the lock and are no longer lockless.
> + *
> + *   On PREEMPT_RT, the local lock neither disables interrupts nor preemption
> + *   which means the lockless fastpath cannot be used as it might interfere with
> + *   an in-progress slow path operations. In this case the local lock is always
> + *   taken but it still utilizes the freelist for the common operations.
>   *
>   *   lockless fastpaths
>   *
> @@ -167,8 +169,9 @@
>   * function call even on !PREEMPT_RT, use inline preempt_disable() there.
>   */
>  #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> -#define slub_get_cpu_ptr(var)	get_cpu_ptr(var)
> -#define slub_put_cpu_ptr(var)	put_cpu_ptr(var)
> +#define slub_get_cpu_ptr(var)		get_cpu_ptr(var)
> +#define slub_put_cpu_ptr(var)		put_cpu_ptr(var)
> +#define USE_LOCKLESS_FAST_PATH()	(true)
>  #else
>  #define slub_get_cpu_ptr(var)		\
>  ({					\
> @@ -180,6 +183,7 @@ do {					\
>  	(void)(var);			\
>  	migrate_enable();		\
>  } while (0)
> +#define USE_LOCKLESS_FAST_PATH()	(false)
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
> @@ -474,7 +478,7 @@ static inline bool __cmpxchg_double_slab
>  		void *freelist_new, unsigned long counters_new,
>  		const char *n)
>  {
> -	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
> +	if (USE_LOCKLESS_FAST_PATH())
>  		lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>  #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CMPXCHG_DOUBLE) && \
>      defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE)
> @@ -3287,14 +3291,8 @@ static __always_inline void *slab_alloc_
>  
>  	object = c->freelist;
>  	slab = c->slab;
> -	/*
> -	 * We cannot use the lockless fastpath on PREEMPT_RT because if a
> -	 * slowpath has taken the local_lock_irqsave(), it is not protected
> -	 * against a fast path operation in an irq handler. So we need to take
> -	 * the slow path which uses local_lock. It is still relatively fast if
> -	 * there is a suitable cpu freelist.
> -	 */
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) ||
> +
> +	if (!USE_LOCKLESS_FAST_PATH() ||
>  	    unlikely(!object || !slab || !node_match(slab, node))) {
>  		object = __slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, addr, c);
>  	} else {
> @@ -3554,6 +3552,7 @@ static __always_inline void do_slab_free
>  	void *tail_obj = tail ? : head;
>  	struct kmem_cache_cpu *c;
>  	unsigned long tid;
> +	void **freelist;
>  
>  redo:
>  	/*
> @@ -3568,9 +3567,13 @@ static __always_inline void do_slab_free
>  	/* Same with comment on barrier() in slab_alloc_node() */
>  	barrier();
>  
> -	if (likely(slab == c->slab)) {
> -#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> -		void **freelist = READ_ONCE(c->freelist);
> +	if (unlikely(slab != c->slab)) {
> +		__slab_free(s, slab, head, tail_obj, cnt, addr);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (USE_LOCKLESS_FAST_PATH()) {
> +		freelist = READ_ONCE(c->freelist);
>  
>  		set_freepointer(s, tail_obj, freelist);
>  
> @@ -3582,16 +3585,8 @@ static __always_inline void do_slab_free
>  			note_cmpxchg_failure("slab_free", s, tid);
>  			goto redo;
>  		}
> -#else /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
> -		/*
> -		 * We cannot use the lockless fastpath on PREEMPT_RT because if
> -		 * a slowpath has taken the local_lock_irqsave(), it is not
> -		 * protected against a fast path operation in an irq handler. So
> -		 * we need to take the local_lock. We shouldn't simply defer to
> -		 * __slab_free() as that wouldn't use the cpu freelist at all.
> -		 */
> -		void **freelist;
> -
> +	} else {
> +		/* Update the free list under the local lock */
>  		local_lock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
>  		c = this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
>  		if (unlikely(slab != c->slab)) {
> @@ -3606,11 +3601,8 @@ static __always_inline void do_slab_free
>  		c->tid = next_tid(tid);
>  
>  		local_unlock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
> -#endif
> -		stat(s, FREE_FASTPATH);
> -	} else
> -		__slab_free(s, slab, head, tail_obj, cnt, addr);
> -
> +	}
> +	stat(s, FREE_FASTPATH);
>  }
>  
>  static __always_inline void slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,



  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-25  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-23 17:03 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: fix validation races and cleanup locking Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-23 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/slub: move free_debug_processing() further Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-23 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/slub: restrict sysfs validation to debug caches and make it safe Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24  4:41   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-23 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/slub: remove slab_lock() usage for debug operations Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-23 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/slub: convert object_map_lock to non-raw spinlock Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 15:53   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-23 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/slub: simplify __cmpxchg_double_slab() and slab_[un]lock() Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 10:24   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-24 11:51     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 12:45       ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-24 16:31     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-24 13:04   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-25 12:41     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 16:25   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-25 12:59     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-25  7:51 ` [PATCH 6/5] slub: Make PREEMPT_RT support less convoluted Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-25  8:41   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2022-08-25  8:49   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-25 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: fix validation races and cleanup locking Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2903a7a4-7ef1-92e0-05df-ef7cf2fa65b1@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).