From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Rongwei Wang <rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/slub: simplify __cmpxchg_double_slab() and slab_[un]lock()
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:31:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwZSUpYY9l442Lxr@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YwX8VPptgCLkuP6i@hyeyoo>
On 2022-08-24 19:24:20 [+0900], Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> I'm not familiar with PREEMPT_RT preemption model so not sure I'm following.
>
> 1) Does "interrupts are threaded on RT" mean processing _most_ (all handlers
> that did not specified IRQF_NO_THREAD) of interrupts are delayed to irq threads
> and processed later in process context, and the kernel *never* use
> spinlock_t, local_lock_t that does not disable interrupts (and sleep) on RT
> in hardware/software interrupt context?
All non-threaded interrupts (or everything in hardirq context) must not
allocate (even with GFP_ATOMIC) or free memory on PREEMPT_RT. This is
policy. If you refer by "software interrupt" to softirqs then they can
allocate memory since softirq is also threaded.
> BTW Is there a good documentation/papers on PREEMPT_RT preemption model?
> I tried to find but only found Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst :(
What is it, that you are looking for? But the locking description is
good ;)
> Thanks!
>
> > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-24 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-23 17:03 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: fix validation races and cleanup locking Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-23 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/slub: move free_debug_processing() further Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-23 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/slub: restrict sysfs validation to debug caches and make it safe Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 4:41 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-23 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/slub: remove slab_lock() usage for debug operations Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-23 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/slub: convert object_map_lock to non-raw spinlock Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 15:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-23 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/slub: simplify __cmpxchg_double_slab() and slab_[un]lock() Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 10:24 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-24 11:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 12:45 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-24 16:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2022-08-24 13:04 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-25 12:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 16:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-25 12:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-25 7:51 ` [PATCH 6/5] slub: Make PREEMPT_RT support less convoluted Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-25 8:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-25 8:49 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-25 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: fix validation races and cleanup locking Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwZSUpYY9l442Lxr@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).