linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	bsingharora@gmail.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 11/38] mm: introduce an additional vma bit for powerpc pkey
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:10:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <290636b0-aafd-9bcd-d309-4cff41ce923c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499289735-14220-12-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>

On 07/05/2017 02:21 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> Currently there are only 4bits in the vma flags to support 16 keys
> on x86.  powerpc supports 32 keys, which needs 5bits. This patch
> introduces an addition bit in the vma flags.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
> ---
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c |    6 +++++-
>  include/linux/mm.h |   18 +++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index f0c8b33..2ddc298 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -666,12 +666,16 @@ static void show_smap_vma_flags(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  		[ilog2(VM_MERGEABLE)]	= "mg",
>  		[ilog2(VM_UFFD_MISSING)]= "um",
>  		[ilog2(VM_UFFD_WP)]	= "uw",
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS
>  		/* These come out via ProtectionKey: */
>  		[ilog2(VM_PKEY_BIT0)]	= "",
>  		[ilog2(VM_PKEY_BIT1)]	= "",
>  		[ilog2(VM_PKEY_BIT2)]	= "",
>  		[ilog2(VM_PKEY_BIT3)]	= "",
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> +		/* Additional bit in ProtectionKey: */
> +		[ilog2(VM_PKEY_BIT4)]	= "",
>  #endif

I'd probably just leave the #ifdef out and eat the byte or whatever of
storage that this costs us on x86.

>  	};
>  	size_t i;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 7cb17c6..3d35bcc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -208,21 +208,29 @@ extern int overcommit_kbytes_handler(struct ctl_table *, int, void __user *,
>  #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_1	33	/* bit only usable on 64-bit architectures */
>  #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_2	34	/* bit only usable on 64-bit architectures */
>  #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_3	35	/* bit only usable on 64-bit architectures */
> +#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_4	36	/* bit only usable on 64-bit arch */

Please just copy the above lines.

>  #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_0	BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_0)
>  #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_1	BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_1)
>  #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_2	BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_2)
>  #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_3	BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_3)
> +#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_4	BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_4)
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS */
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86)
> -# define VM_PAT		VM_ARCH_1	/* PAT reserves whole VMA at once (x86) */
> -#if defined (CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS
>  # define VM_PKEY_SHIFT	VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_0
> -# define VM_PKEY_BIT0	VM_HIGH_ARCH_0	/* A protection key is a 4-bit value */
> +# define VM_PKEY_BIT0	VM_HIGH_ARCH_0
>  # define VM_PKEY_BIT1	VM_HIGH_ARCH_1
>  # define VM_PKEY_BIT2	VM_HIGH_ARCH_2
>  # define VM_PKEY_BIT3	VM_HIGH_ARCH_3
> -#endif
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS */

We have the space here, so can we just say that it's 4-bits on x86 and 5
on ppc?

> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS)
> +# define VM_PKEY_BIT4	VM_HIGH_ARCH_4 /* additional key bit used on ppc64 */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS */

Why bother #ifdef'ing a #define?

> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86)
> +# define VM_PAT		VM_ARCH_1	/* PAT reserves whole VMA at once (x86) */
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_PPC)
>  # define VM_SAO		VM_ARCH_1	/* Strong Access Ordering (powerpc) */
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_PARISC)
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-11 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-05 21:21 [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 01/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 4K backed HPTE pages Ram Pai
2017-07-07  7:25   ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 02/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K " Ram Pai
2017-07-11  5:59   ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-11 15:44     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-12  3:10       ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-13  7:39         ` Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 03/38] powerpc: introduce pte_set_hash_slot() helper Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 04/38] powerpc: introduce pte_get_hash_gslot() helper Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 05/38] powerpc: capture the PTE format changes in the dump pte report Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 06/38] powerpc: use helper functions in __hash_page_64K() for 64K PTE Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 07/38] powerpc: use helper functions in __hash_page_huge() " Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 08/38] powerpc: use helper functions in __hash_page_4K() " Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 09/38] powerpc: use helper functions in __hash_page_4K() for 4K PTE Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 10/38] powerpc: use helper functions in flush_hash_page() Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 11/38] mm: introduce an additional vma bit for powerpc pkey Ram Pai
2017-07-11 18:10   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2017-07-12 22:23     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-12 22:40       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 12/38] mm: ability to disable execute permission on a key at creation Ram Pai
2017-07-11 18:11   ` Dave Hansen
2017-07-11 21:29     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-07-11 21:51       ` Ram Pai
2017-07-11 21:57         ` Dave Hansen
2017-07-11 22:14           ` Ram Pai
2017-07-11 22:19             ` Dave Hansen
2017-07-11 22:08         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-07-11 22:19           ` Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 13/38] x86: disallow pkey creation with PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE Ram Pai
2017-07-11 18:12   ` Dave Hansen
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 14/38] powerpc: initial plumbing for key management Ram Pai
2017-07-12  3:28   ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-13  7:45     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-13 20:37       ` Ram Pai
2017-07-13 21:30         ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 15/38] powerpc: helper function to read,write AMR,IAMR,UAMOR registers Ram Pai
2017-07-12  5:26   ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-13  7:55     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-13  9:49       ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-13 23:29         ` Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 16/38] powerpc: implementation for arch_set_user_pkey_access() Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 17/38] powerpc: sys_pkey_alloc() and sys_pkey_free() system calls Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 18/38] powerpc: store and restore the pkey state across context switches Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 19/38] powerpc: introduce execute-only pkey Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 20/38] powerpc: ability to associate pkey to a vma Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 21/38] powerpc: implementation for arch_override_mprotect_pkey() Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:21 ` [RFC v5 22/38] powerpc: map vma key-protection bits to pte key bits Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 23/38] powerpc: sys_pkey_mprotect() system call Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 24/38] powerpc: Program HPTE key protection bits Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 25/38] powerpc: helper to validate key-access permissions of a pte Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 26/38] powerpc: check key protection for user page access Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 27/38] powerpc: Macro the mask used for checking DSI exception Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 28/38] powerpc: implementation for arch_vma_access_permitted() Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 29/38] powerpc: Handle exceptions caused by pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 30/38] powerpc: capture AMR register content on " Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 31/38] powerpc: introduce get_pte_pkey() helper Ram Pai
2017-07-10  3:11   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-07-10  5:55     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-11 11:22       ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 32/38] powerpc: capture the violated protection key on fault Ram Pai
2017-07-10  3:10   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-07-10  5:49     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 33/38] powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-07-10  3:08   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 34/38] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma Ram Pai
2017-07-10  3:07   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-07-10  6:01     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-11 18:13   ` Dave Hansen
2017-07-13  8:03     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-13 14:07       ` Dave Hansen
2017-07-13 17:04         ` Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 35/38] selftest: Move protecton key selftest to arch neutral directory Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 36/38] selftest: PowerPC specific test updates to memory protection keys Ram Pai
2017-07-11 17:33   ` Dave Hansen
2017-07-12 21:57     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 37/38] Documentation: Move protecton key documentation to arch neutral directory Ram Pai
2017-07-05 21:22 ` [RFC v5 38/38] Documentation: PowerPC specific updates to memory protection keys Ram Pai
2017-07-10  3:07   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-07-10  5:59     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-11 18:23   ` Dave Hansen
2017-07-13 19:56     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-10  5:43 ` [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Anshuman Khandual
2017-07-10  6:05   ` Ram Pai
2017-07-10 17:15     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-11 14:52 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-11 19:32   ` Ram Pai
2017-07-11 21:30     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-07-12  7:23     ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-12  7:39       ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-12 22:53       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-07-13  6:20         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=290636b0-aafd-9bcd-d309-4cff41ce923c@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).