From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid()
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:11:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a1592ad-bc9d-4664-fd19-f7448a37edc0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33fa74c2-f32d-f224-eb30-acdb717179ff@huawei.com>
On 2021/4/22 23:28, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>
> On 2021/4/22 15:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 03:00:20PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>> On 2021/4/21 14:51, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>>> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> These patches aim to remove CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE and essentially
>>>> hardwire
>>>> pfn_valid_within() to 1.
>>>>
>>>> The idea is to mark NOMAP pages as reserved in the memory map and
>>>> restore
>>>> the intended semantics of pfn_valid() to designate availability of
>>>> struct
>>>> page for a pfn.
>>>>
>>>> With this the core mm will be able to cope with the fact that it
>>>> cannot use
>>>> NOMAP pages and the holes created by NOMAP ranges within MAX_ORDER
>>>> blocks
>>>> will be treated correctly even without the need for pfn_valid_within.
>>>>
>>>> The patches are only boot tested on qemu-system-aarch64 so I'd really
>>>> appreciate memory stress tests on real hardware.
>>>>
>>>> If this actually works we'll be one step closer to drop custom
>>>> pfn_valid()
>>>> on arm64 altogether.
...
>
> Ok, thanks, we met a same panic like the link on arm32(without
> HOLES_IN_ZONE),
>
> the scheme for arm64 could be suit for arm32, right? I will try the
> patchset with
>
> some changes on arm32 and give some feedback.
I tested this patchset(plus arm32 change, like arm64 does) based on lts
5.10,add
some debug log, the useful info shows below, if we enable HOLES_IN_ZONE,
no panic,
any idea, thanks.
Zone ranges:
Normal [mem 0x0000000080a00000-0x00000000b01fffff]
HighMem [mem 0x00000000b0200000-0x00000000ffffefff]
Movable zone start for each node
Early memory node ranges
node 0: [mem 0x0000000080a00000-0x00000000855fffff]
node 0: [mem 0x0000000086a00000-0x0000000087dfffff]
node 0: [mem 0x000000008bd00000-0x000000008c4fffff]
node 0: [mem 0x000000008e300000-0x000000008ecfffff]
node 0: [mem 0x0000000090d00000-0x00000000bfffffff]
node 0: [mem 0x00000000cc000000-0x00000000dc9fffff]
node 0: [mem 0x00000000de700000-0x00000000de9fffff]
node 0: [mem 0x00000000e0800000-0x00000000e0bfffff]
node 0: [mem 0x00000000f4b00000-0x00000000f6ffffff]
node 0: [mem 0x00000000fda00000-0x00000000ffffefff]
----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 85800, 85800000 end_pfn = 86a00, 86a00000
----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 8c800, 8c800000 end_pfn = 8e300, 8e300000
----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 8f000, 8f000000 end_pfn = 90000, 90000000
----> free_memmap, start_pfn = dcc00, dcc00000 end_pfn = de700, de700000
----> free_memmap, start_pfn = dec00, dec00000 end_pfn = e0000, e0000000
----> free_memmap, start_pfn = e0c00, e0c00000 end_pfn = e4000, e4000000
----> free_memmap, start_pfn = f7000, f7000000 end_pfn = f8000, f8000000
=== >move_freepages: start_pfn/end_pfn [de600, de7ff], [de600000,
de7ff000] : pfn =de600 pfn2phy = de600000 , page = ef3cc000, page-flags
= ffffffff
8<--- cut here ---
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffe
pgd = 5dd50df5
[fffffffe] *pgd=affff861, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000
Internal error: Oops: 37 [#1] SMP ARM
Modules linked in: gmac(O)
CPU: 2 PID: 635 Comm: test-oom Tainted: G O 5.10.0+ #31
Hardware name: Hisilicon A9
PC is at move_freepages_block+0x150/0x278
LR is at move_freepages_block+0x150/0x278
pc : [<c02383a4>] lr : [<c02383a4>] psr: 200e0393
sp : c4179cf8 ip : 00000000 fp : 00000001
r10: c4179d58 r9 : 000de7ff r8 : 00000000
r7 : c0863280 r6 : 000de600 r5 : 000de600 r4 : ef3cc000
r3 : ffffffff r2 : 00000000 r1 : ef5d069c r0 : fffffffe
Flags: nzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user
Control: 1ac5387d Table: 83b0c04a DAC: 55555555
Process test-oom (pid: 635, stack limit = 0x25d667df)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-23 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 6:51 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 10:49 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 10:51 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 10:59 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 12:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 13:13 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 11:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 12:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 13:15 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-22 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Kefeng Wang
2021-04-22 7:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-22 15:28 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-23 8:11 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2021-04-25 7:19 ` arm32: panic in move_freepages (Was [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid()) Mike Rapoport
2021-04-25 7:51 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-26 5:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-26 15:26 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-27 6:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-27 11:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-28 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-29 0:48 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-29 6:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-29 10:22 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-30 9:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-30 11:24 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-03 6:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-03 8:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-03 8:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-06 12:47 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07 7:17 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07 10:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-07 12:34 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-09 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-10 3:10 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-11 8:48 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12 3:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 8:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 3:44 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-13 10:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14 2:18 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 3:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-25 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a1592ad-bc9d-4664-fd19-f7448a37edc0@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).