linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid()
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:19:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d31ff896-ea1c-d47c-0d11-34fdcd3b7ad8@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210421065108.1987-2-rppt@kernel.org>

On 4/21/21 12:21 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Add comment describing the semantics of pfn_valid() that clarifies that
> pfn_valid() only checks for availability of a memory map entry (i.e. struct
> page) for a PFN rather than availability of usable memory backing that PFN.
> 
> The most "generic" version of pfn_valid() used by the configurations with
> SPARSEMEM enabled resides in include/linux/mmzone.h so this is the most
> suitable place for documentation about semantics of pfn_valid().
> 
> Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/mmzone.h | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 47946cec7584..961f0eeefb62 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1410,6 +1410,17 @@ static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
> +/**
> + * pfn_valid - check if there is a valid memory map entry for a PFN
> + * @pfn: the page frame number to check
> + *
> + * Check if there is a valid memory map entry aka struct page for the @pfn.
> + * Note, that availability of the memory map entry does not imply that
> + * there is actual usable memory at that @pfn. The struct page may
> + * represent a hole or an unusable page frame.
> + *
> + * Return: 1 for PFNs that have memory map entries and 0 otherwise
> + */
>  static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
>  {
>  	struct mem_section *ms;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-21 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-21  6:51 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21  6:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 10:49   ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2021-04-21  6:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21  7:49   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 10:51   ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21  6:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 10:59   ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 12:19     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 13:13       ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21  6:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21  7:49   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 11:06   ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 12:24     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 13:15       ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-22  7:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Kefeng Wang
2021-04-22  7:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-22 15:28     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-23  8:11       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-25  7:19         ` arm32: panic in move_freepages (Was [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid()) Mike Rapoport
2021-04-25  7:51           ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-26  5:20             ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-26 15:26               ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-27  6:23                 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-27 11:08                   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-28  5:59                     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-29  0:48                       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-29  6:57                         ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-29 10:22                           ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-30  9:51                             ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-30 11:24                               ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-03  6:26                                 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-03  8:07                                   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-03  8:44                                     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-06 12:47                                       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07  7:17                                         ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07 10:30                                           ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-07 12:34                                             ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-09  5:59                                               ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-10  3:10                                                 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-11  8:48                                                   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12  3:08                                                     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12  8:26                                                       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13  3:44                                                         ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-13 10:55                                                           ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14  2:18                                                             ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12  3:50             ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-25  6:59       ` [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d31ff896-ea1c-d47c-0d11-34fdcd3b7ad8@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).