linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* debug linux kernel memory management / pressure
@ 2019-03-27 10:56 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
  2019-03-29  9:41 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG @ 2019-03-27 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm; +Cc: l.roehrs, Daniel Aberger - Profihost AG, n.fahldieck

Hello list,

i hope this is the right place to ask. If not i would be happy to point
me to something else.

I'm seeing the following behaviour on some of our hosts running a SLES
15 kernel (kernel v4.12 as it's base) but i don't think it's related to
the kernel.

At some "random" interval - mostly 3-6 weeks of uptime. Suddenly mem
pressure rises and the linux cache (Cached: /proc/meminfo) drops from
12G to 3G. After that io pressure rises most probably due to low cache.
But at the same time i've MemFree und MemAvailable at 19-22G.

Why does this happen? How can i debug this situation? I would expect
that the page / file cache never drops if there is so much free mem.

Thanks a lot for your help.

Greets,
Stefan

Not sure whether needed but these are the vm. kernel settings:
vm.admin_reserve_kbytes = 8192
vm.block_dump = 0
vm.compact_unevictable_allowed = 1
vm.dirty_background_bytes = 0
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10
vm.dirty_bytes = 0
vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 3000
vm.dirty_ratio = 20
vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 500
vm.dirtytime_expire_seconds = 43200
vm.drop_caches = 0
vm.extfrag_threshold = 500
vm.hugepages_treat_as_movable = 0
vm.hugetlb_shm_group = 0
vm.laptop_mode = 0
vm.legacy_va_layout = 0
vm.lowmem_reserve_ratio = 256   256     32      1
vm.max_map_count = 65530
vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 0
vm.memory_failure_recovery = 1
vm.min_free_kbytes = 393216
vm.min_slab_ratio = 5
vm.min_unmapped_ratio = 1
vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536
vm.mmap_rnd_bits = 28
vm.mmap_rnd_compat_bits = 8
vm.nr_hugepages = 0
vm.nr_hugepages_mempolicy = 0
vm.nr_overcommit_hugepages = 0
vm.nr_pdflush_threads = 0
vm.numa_zonelist_order = default
vm.oom_dump_tasks = 1
vm.oom_kill_allocating_task = 0
vm.overcommit_kbytes = 0
vm.overcommit_memory = 0
vm.overcommit_ratio = 50
vm.page-cluster = 3
vm.panic_on_oom = 0
vm.percpu_pagelist_fraction = 0
vm.stat_interval = 1
vm.swappiness = 50
vm.user_reserve_kbytes = 131072
vm.vfs_cache_pressure = 100
vm.watermark_scale_factor = 10
vm.zone_reclaim_mode = 0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: debug linux kernel memory management / pressure
  2019-03-27 10:56 debug linux kernel memory management / pressure Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
@ 2019-03-29  9:41 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
  2019-04-05 10:37   ` Vlastimil Babka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG @ 2019-03-29  9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm; +Cc: l.roehrs, Daniel Aberger - Profihost AG, n.fahldieck

Hi,

nobody an idea? I had another system today:

# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:       131911684 kB
MemFree:        25734836 kB
MemAvailable:   78158816 kB
Buffers:            2916 kB
Cached:         20650184 kB
SwapCached:       544016 kB
Active:         58999352 kB
Inactive:       10084060 kB
Active(anon):   43412532 kB
Inactive(anon):  5583220 kB
Active(file):   15586820 kB
Inactive(file):  4500840 kB
Unevictable:       35032 kB
Mlocked:           35032 kB
SwapTotal:       3905532 kB
SwapFree:              0 kB
Dirty:              1048 kB
Writeback:         20144 kB
AnonPages:      47923392 kB
Mapped:           775376 kB
Shmem:            561420 kB
Slab:           35798052 kB
SReclaimable:   34309112 kB
SUnreclaim:      1488940 kB
KernelStack:       42160 kB
PageTables:       248008 kB
NFS_Unstable:          0 kB
Bounce:                0 kB
WritebackTmp:          0 kB
CommitLimit:    69861372 kB
Committed_AS:   100328892 kB
VmallocTotal:   34359738367 kB
VmallocUsed:           0 kB
VmallocChunk:          0 kB
HardwareCorrupted:     0 kB
AnonHugePages:  19177472 kB
ShmemHugePages:        0 kB
ShmemPmdMapped:        0 kB
HugePages_Total:       0
HugePages_Free:        0
HugePages_Rsvd:        0
HugePages_Surp:        0
Hugepagesize:       2048 kB
DirectMap4k:      951376 kB
DirectMap2M:    87015424 kB
DirectMap1G:    48234496 kB

# cat /proc/buddyinfo
Node 0, zone      DMA      1      0      0      0      2      1      1
    0      1      1      3
Node 0, zone    DMA32    372    418    403    395    371    322    262
  179    114      0      0
Node 0, zone   Normal  89147  96397  76496  56407  41671  29289  18142
10278   4075      0      0
Node 1, zone   Normal 113266      0      1      1      1      1      1
    1      1      0      0

But with high PSI / memory pressure values above 10-30.

Greets,
Stefan
Am 27.03.19 um 11:56 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
> Hello list,
> 
> i hope this is the right place to ask. If not i would be happy to point
> me to something else.
> 
> I'm seeing the following behaviour on some of our hosts running a SLES
> 15 kernel (kernel v4.12 as it's base) but i don't think it's related to
> the kernel.
> 
> At some "random" interval - mostly 3-6 weeks of uptime. Suddenly mem
> pressure rises and the linux cache (Cached: /proc/meminfo) drops from
> 12G to 3G. After that io pressure rises most probably due to low cache.
> But at the same time i've MemFree und MemAvailable at 19-22G.
> 
> Why does this happen? How can i debug this situation? I would expect
> that the page / file cache never drops if there is so much free mem.
> 
> Thanks a lot for your help.
> 
> Greets,
> Stefan
> 
> Not sure whether needed but these are the vm. kernel settings:
> vm.admin_reserve_kbytes = 8192
> vm.block_dump = 0
> vm.compact_unevictable_allowed = 1
> vm.dirty_background_bytes = 0
> vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10
> vm.dirty_bytes = 0
> vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 3000
> vm.dirty_ratio = 20
> vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 500
> vm.dirtytime_expire_seconds = 43200
> vm.drop_caches = 0
> vm.extfrag_threshold = 500
> vm.hugepages_treat_as_movable = 0
> vm.hugetlb_shm_group = 0
> vm.laptop_mode = 0
> vm.legacy_va_layout = 0
> vm.lowmem_reserve_ratio = 256   256     32      1
> vm.max_map_count = 65530
> vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 0
> vm.memory_failure_recovery = 1
> vm.min_free_kbytes = 393216
> vm.min_slab_ratio = 5
> vm.min_unmapped_ratio = 1
> vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536
> vm.mmap_rnd_bits = 28
> vm.mmap_rnd_compat_bits = 8
> vm.nr_hugepages = 0
> vm.nr_hugepages_mempolicy = 0
> vm.nr_overcommit_hugepages = 0
> vm.nr_pdflush_threads = 0
> vm.numa_zonelist_order = default
> vm.oom_dump_tasks = 1
> vm.oom_kill_allocating_task = 0
> vm.overcommit_kbytes = 0
> vm.overcommit_memory = 0
> vm.overcommit_ratio = 50
> vm.page-cluster = 3
> vm.panic_on_oom = 0
> vm.percpu_pagelist_fraction = 0
> vm.stat_interval = 1
> vm.swappiness = 50
> vm.user_reserve_kbytes = 131072
> vm.vfs_cache_pressure = 100
> vm.watermark_scale_factor = 10
> vm.zone_reclaim_mode = 0
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: debug linux kernel memory management / pressure
  2019-03-29  9:41 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
@ 2019-04-05 10:37   ` Vlastimil Babka
  2019-04-23  6:42     ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vlastimil Babka @ 2019-04-05 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG, linux-mm
  Cc: l.roehrs, Daniel Aberger - Profihost AG, n.fahldieck,
	Michal Hocko, Mel Gorman

On 3/29/19 10:41 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> nobody an idea? I had another system today:

Well, isn't it still the same thing as we discussed in last autumn?
You did report success with the ill-fated patch "mm: thp:  relax __GFP_THISNODE
for MADV_HUGEPAGE mappings", or not?

> # cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal:       131911684 kB
> MemFree:        25734836 kB
> MemAvailable:   78158816 kB
> Buffers:            2916 kB
> Cached:         20650184 kB
> SwapCached:       544016 kB
> Active:         58999352 kB
> Inactive:       10084060 kB
> Active(anon):   43412532 kB
> Inactive(anon):  5583220 kB
> Active(file):   15586820 kB
> Inactive(file):  4500840 kB
> Unevictable:       35032 kB
> Mlocked:           35032 kB
> SwapTotal:       3905532 kB
> SwapFree:              0 kB
> Dirty:              1048 kB
> Writeback:         20144 kB
> AnonPages:      47923392 kB
> Mapped:           775376 kB
> Shmem:            561420 kB
> Slab:           35798052 kB
> SReclaimable:   34309112 kB

That's rather significant. Got a /proc/slabinfo from such system state?

> SUnreclaim:      1488940 kB
> KernelStack:       42160 kB
> PageTables:       248008 kB
> NFS_Unstable:          0 kB
> Bounce:                0 kB
> WritebackTmp:          0 kB
> CommitLimit:    69861372 kB
> Committed_AS:   100328892 kB
> VmallocTotal:   34359738367 kB
> VmallocUsed:           0 kB
> VmallocChunk:          0 kB
> HardwareCorrupted:     0 kB
> AnonHugePages:  19177472 kB
> ShmemHugePages:        0 kB
> ShmemPmdMapped:        0 kB
> HugePages_Total:       0
> HugePages_Free:        0
> HugePages_Rsvd:        0
> HugePages_Surp:        0
> Hugepagesize:       2048 kB
> DirectMap4k:      951376 kB
> DirectMap2M:    87015424 kB
> DirectMap1G:    48234496 kB
> 
> # cat /proc/buddyinfo
> Node 0, zone      DMA      1      0      0      0      2      1      1
>     0      1      1      3
> Node 0, zone    DMA32    372    418    403    395    371    322    262
>   179    114      0      0
> Node 0, zone   Normal  89147  96397  76496  56407  41671  29289  18142
> 10278   4075      0      0
> Node 1, zone   Normal 113266      0      1      1      1      1      1
>     1      1      0      0

Node 1 seems quite fragmented. Again from last year I recall somebody (was it
you?) capturing a larger series of snapshots where we saw a Sreclaimable rise
due to some overnight 'find /' activity inflating dentry/inode caches which then
got slowly reclaimed, but memory remained fragmented until enough of slab was
reclaimed, and compaction couldn't help. drop_caches did help. Looks like this
might be the same case. Add in something that tries to get large-order
allocations on node 1 (e.g. with __GFP_THISNODE) and overreclaim will happen.

> But with high PSI / memory pressure values above 10-30.
> 
> Greets,
> Stefan
> Am 27.03.19 um 11:56 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
>> Hello list,
>> 
>> i hope this is the right place to ask. If not i would be happy to point
>> me to something else.
>> 
>> I'm seeing the following behaviour on some of our hosts running a SLES
>> 15 kernel (kernel v4.12 as it's base) but i don't think it's related to
>> the kernel.
>> 
>> At some "random" interval - mostly 3-6 weeks of uptime. Suddenly mem
>> pressure rises and the linux cache (Cached: /proc/meminfo) drops from
>> 12G to 3G. After that io pressure rises most probably due to low cache.
>> But at the same time i've MemFree und MemAvailable at 19-22G.
>> 
>> Why does this happen? How can i debug this situation? I would expect
>> that the page / file cache never drops if there is so much free mem.
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for your help.
>> 
>> Greets,
>> Stefan
>> 
>> Not sure whether needed but these are the vm. kernel settings:
>> vm.admin_reserve_kbytes = 8192
>> vm.block_dump = 0
>> vm.compact_unevictable_allowed = 1
>> vm.dirty_background_bytes = 0
>> vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10
>> vm.dirty_bytes = 0
>> vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 3000
>> vm.dirty_ratio = 20
>> vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 500
>> vm.dirtytime_expire_seconds = 43200
>> vm.drop_caches = 0
>> vm.extfrag_threshold = 500
>> vm.hugepages_treat_as_movable = 0
>> vm.hugetlb_shm_group = 0
>> vm.laptop_mode = 0
>> vm.legacy_va_layout = 0
>> vm.lowmem_reserve_ratio = 256   256     32      1
>> vm.max_map_count = 65530
>> vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 0
>> vm.memory_failure_recovery = 1
>> vm.min_free_kbytes = 393216
>> vm.min_slab_ratio = 5
>> vm.min_unmapped_ratio = 1
>> vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536
>> vm.mmap_rnd_bits = 28
>> vm.mmap_rnd_compat_bits = 8
>> vm.nr_hugepages = 0
>> vm.nr_hugepages_mempolicy = 0
>> vm.nr_overcommit_hugepages = 0
>> vm.nr_pdflush_threads = 0
>> vm.numa_zonelist_order = default
>> vm.oom_dump_tasks = 1
>> vm.oom_kill_allocating_task = 0
>> vm.overcommit_kbytes = 0
>> vm.overcommit_memory = 0
>> vm.overcommit_ratio = 50
>> vm.page-cluster = 3
>> vm.panic_on_oom = 0
>> vm.percpu_pagelist_fraction = 0
>> vm.stat_interval = 1
>> vm.swappiness = 50
>> vm.user_reserve_kbytes = 131072
>> vm.vfs_cache_pressure = 100
>> vm.watermark_scale_factor = 10
>> vm.zone_reclaim_mode = 0
>> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: debug linux kernel memory management / pressure
  2019-04-05 10:37   ` Vlastimil Babka
@ 2019-04-23  6:42     ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG @ 2019-04-23  6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vlastimil Babka, linux-mm
  Cc: l.roehrs, Daniel Aberger - Profihost AG, n.fahldieck,
	Michal Hocko, Mel Gorman

Hi Vlastimil,

sorry for the late reply i was on holiday.

Am 05.04.19 um 12:37 schrieb Vlastimil Babka:
> On 3/29/19 10:41 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> nobody an idea? I had another system today:
> 
> Well, isn't it still the same thing as we discussed in last autumn?
> You did report success with the ill-fated patch "mm: thp:  relax __GFP_THISNODE
> for MADV_HUGEPAGE mappings", or not?

No it's not. Last year those were KVM Host machines. These time it's a
LAMP machine. But i think i'll upgrade to 4.19.36 LTS and see if that
fixes the problem.

Thanks!

> 
>> # cat /proc/meminfo
>> MemTotal:       131911684 kB
>> MemFree:        25734836 kB
>> MemAvailable:   78158816 kB
>> Buffers:            2916 kB
>> Cached:         20650184 kB
>> SwapCached:       544016 kB
>> Active:         58999352 kB
>> Inactive:       10084060 kB
>> Active(anon):   43412532 kB
>> Inactive(anon):  5583220 kB
>> Active(file):   15586820 kB
>> Inactive(file):  4500840 kB
>> Unevictable:       35032 kB
>> Mlocked:           35032 kB
>> SwapTotal:       3905532 kB
>> SwapFree:              0 kB
>> Dirty:              1048 kB
>> Writeback:         20144 kB
>> AnonPages:      47923392 kB
>> Mapped:           775376 kB
>> Shmem:            561420 kB
>> Slab:           35798052 kB
>> SReclaimable:   34309112 kB
> 
> That's rather significant. Got a /proc/slabinfo from such system state?
> 
>> SUnreclaim:      1488940 kB
>> KernelStack:       42160 kB
>> PageTables:       248008 kB
>> NFS_Unstable:          0 kB
>> Bounce:                0 kB
>> WritebackTmp:          0 kB
>> CommitLimit:    69861372 kB
>> Committed_AS:   100328892 kB
>> VmallocTotal:   34359738367 kB
>> VmallocUsed:           0 kB
>> VmallocChunk:          0 kB
>> HardwareCorrupted:     0 kB
>> AnonHugePages:  19177472 kB
>> ShmemHugePages:        0 kB
>> ShmemPmdMapped:        0 kB
>> HugePages_Total:       0
>> HugePages_Free:        0
>> HugePages_Rsvd:        0
>> HugePages_Surp:        0
>> Hugepagesize:       2048 kB
>> DirectMap4k:      951376 kB
>> DirectMap2M:    87015424 kB
>> DirectMap1G:    48234496 kB
>>
>> # cat /proc/buddyinfo
>> Node 0, zone      DMA      1      0      0      0      2      1      1
>>     0      1      1      3
>> Node 0, zone    DMA32    372    418    403    395    371    322    262
>>   179    114      0      0
>> Node 0, zone   Normal  89147  96397  76496  56407  41671  29289  18142
>> 10278   4075      0      0
>> Node 1, zone   Normal 113266      0      1      1      1      1      1
>>     1      1      0      0
> 
> Node 1 seems quite fragmented. Again from last year I recall somebody (was it
> you?) capturing a larger series of snapshots where we saw a Sreclaimable rise
> due to some overnight 'find /' activity inflating dentry/inode caches which then
> got slowly reclaimed, but memory remained fragmented until enough of slab was
> reclaimed, and compaction couldn't help. drop_caches did help. Looks like this
> might be the same case. Add in something that tries to get large-order
> allocations on node 1 (e.g. with __GFP_THISNODE) and overreclaim will happen.
> 
>> But with high PSI / memory pressure values above 10-30.
>>
>> Greets,
>> Stefan
>> Am 27.03.19 um 11:56 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> i hope this is the right place to ask. If not i would be happy to point
>>> me to something else.
>>>
>>> I'm seeing the following behaviour on some of our hosts running a SLES
>>> 15 kernel (kernel v4.12 as it's base) but i don't think it's related to
>>> the kernel.
>>>
>>> At some "random" interval - mostly 3-6 weeks of uptime. Suddenly mem
>>> pressure rises and the linux cache (Cached: /proc/meminfo) drops from
>>> 12G to 3G. After that io pressure rises most probably due to low cache.
>>> But at the same time i've MemFree und MemAvailable at 19-22G.
>>>
>>> Why does this happen? How can i debug this situation? I would expect
>>> that the page / file cache never drops if there is so much free mem.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your help.
>>>
>>> Greets,
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>> Not sure whether needed but these are the vm. kernel settings:
>>> vm.admin_reserve_kbytes = 8192
>>> vm.block_dump = 0
>>> vm.compact_unevictable_allowed = 1
>>> vm.dirty_background_bytes = 0
>>> vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10
>>> vm.dirty_bytes = 0
>>> vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 3000
>>> vm.dirty_ratio = 20
>>> vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 500
>>> vm.dirtytime_expire_seconds = 43200
>>> vm.drop_caches = 0
>>> vm.extfrag_threshold = 500
>>> vm.hugepages_treat_as_movable = 0
>>> vm.hugetlb_shm_group = 0
>>> vm.laptop_mode = 0
>>> vm.legacy_va_layout = 0
>>> vm.lowmem_reserve_ratio = 256   256     32      1
>>> vm.max_map_count = 65530
>>> vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 0
>>> vm.memory_failure_recovery = 1
>>> vm.min_free_kbytes = 393216
>>> vm.min_slab_ratio = 5
>>> vm.min_unmapped_ratio = 1
>>> vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536
>>> vm.mmap_rnd_bits = 28
>>> vm.mmap_rnd_compat_bits = 8
>>> vm.nr_hugepages = 0
>>> vm.nr_hugepages_mempolicy = 0
>>> vm.nr_overcommit_hugepages = 0
>>> vm.nr_pdflush_threads = 0
>>> vm.numa_zonelist_order = default
>>> vm.oom_dump_tasks = 1
>>> vm.oom_kill_allocating_task = 0
>>> vm.overcommit_kbytes = 0
>>> vm.overcommit_memory = 0
>>> vm.overcommit_ratio = 50
>>> vm.page-cluster = 3
>>> vm.panic_on_oom = 0
>>> vm.percpu_pagelist_fraction = 0
>>> vm.stat_interval = 1
>>> vm.swappiness = 50
>>> vm.user_reserve_kbytes = 131072
>>> vm.vfs_cache_pressure = 100
>>> vm.watermark_scale_factor = 10
>>> vm.zone_reclaim_mode = 0
>>>
>>
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-23  6:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-27 10:56 debug linux kernel memory management / pressure Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-03-29  9:41 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-04-05 10:37   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-04-23  6:42     ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).