linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	joaodias@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: be more verbose for alloc_contig_range faliures
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:02:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f167b3c-5f0a-444a-c627-49181fc8fe0d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YC4rsr9zkNAvdL4T@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On 18.02.21 09:56, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 17-02-21 08:36:03, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> alloc_contig_range is usually used on cma area or movable zone.
>> It's critical if the page migration fails on those areas so
>> dump more debugging message like memory_hotplug unless user
>> specifiy __GFP_NOWARN.
> 
> I agree with David that this has a potential to generate a lot of output
> and it is not really clear whether it is worth it. Page isolation code
> already has REPORT_FAILURE mode which currently used only for the memory
> hotplug because this was just too noisy from the CMA path - d381c54760dc
> ("mm: only report isolation failures when offlining memory").
> 
> Maybe migration failures are less likely to fail but still.

Side note: I really dislike that uncontrolled error reporting on memory 
offlining path we have enabled as default. Yeah, it might be useful for 
ZONE_MOVABLE in some cases, but otherwise it's just noise.

Just do a "sudo stress-ng --memhotplug 1" and see the log getting 
flooded ...

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-17 16:36 [PATCH] mm: be more verbose for alloc_contig_range faliures Minchan Kim
2021-02-17 16:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-17 17:26   ` Minchan Kim
2021-02-17 17:34     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-17 17:45       ` Minchan Kim
2021-02-18  8:56 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-18  9:02   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-02-18  9:35     ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-18  9:43       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-18  9:59         ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-18 16:19         ` Minchan Kim
2021-02-18 16:26           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-18 16:47             ` Minchan Kim
2021-02-18 16:53               ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-19  9:28           ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-19  9:30             ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-19 10:02               ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-19 10:34                 ` David Hildenbrand
     [not found]             ` <YD50pcPuwV456vwm@google.com>
2021-03-04 16:01               ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-04 16:10                 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-04 16:23                   ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-04 16:28                     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-04 17:11                       ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-04 17:23                         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-04 18:11                           ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-04 18:22                             ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-08 12:49                               ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-08 13:22                                 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-08 14:11                                   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-08 14:13                                     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-08 15:42                                       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-08 15:58                                         ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-08 16:21                                           ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-08 17:01                                             ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-08 20:27                                           ` Minchan Kim
2021-02-18 16:10   ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2f167b3c-5f0a-444a-c627-49181fc8fe0d@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joaodias@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).