linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Prevalidate the address range being added with platform
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:03:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d4f3b14-0715-b2b3-b015-04b8a77abfb8@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <691872bb-b251-83e0-126e-afd54683c83e@redhat.com>



On 1/19/21 5:51 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 18.01.21 14:12, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This introduces memhp_range_allowed() which can be called in various memory
>> hotplug paths to prevalidate the address range which is being added, with
>> the platform. Then memhp_range_allowed() calls memhp_get_pluggable_range()
>> which provides applicable address range depending on whether linear mapping
>> is required or not. For ranges that require linear mapping, it calls a new
>> arch callback arch_get_mappable_range() which the platform can override. So
>> the new callback, in turn provides the platform an opportunity to configure
>> acceptable memory hotplug address ranges in case there are constraints.
>>
>> This mechanism will help prevent platform specific errors deep down during
>> hotplug calls. This drops now redundant check_hotplug_memory_addressable()
>> check in __add_pages() but instead adds a VM_BUG_ON() check which would
> 
> In this patch, you keep the __add_pages() checks. But as discussed, we
> could perform it in mm/memremap.c:pagemap_range() insted and convert it
> to a VM_BUG_ON().

Just to be sure, will the following change achieve what you are
suggesting here. pagemap_range() after this change, will again
be the same like the V1 series.

---
 mm/memory_hotplug.c |  3 +--
 mm/memremap.c       | 12 +++++-------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 46faa914aa25..10d4ec8f349c 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -304,8 +304,7 @@ int __ref __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!params->pgprot.pgprot))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if(!memhp_range_allowed(PFN_PHYS(pfn), nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE, false))
-		return -E2BIG;
+	VM_BUG_ON(!memhp_range_allowed(PFN_PHYS(pfn), nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE, false));
 
 	if (altmap) {
 		/*
diff --git a/mm/memremap.c b/mm/memremap.c
index e15b13736f6a..26c1825756cc 100644
--- a/mm/memremap.c
+++ b/mm/memremap.c
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static void dev_pagemap_percpu_release(struct percpu_ref *ref)
 static int pagemap_range(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, struct mhp_params *params,
 		int range_id, int nid)
 {
+	const bool is_private = pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE;
 	struct range *range = &pgmap->ranges[range_id];
 	struct dev_pagemap *conflict_pgmap;
 	int error, is_ram;
@@ -230,6 +231,9 @@ static int pagemap_range(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, struct mhp_params *params,
 	if (error)
 		goto err_pfn_remap;
 
+	if (!memhp_range_allowed(range->start, range_len(range), !is_private))
+		goto err_pfn_remap;
+
 	mem_hotplug_begin();
 
 	/*
@@ -243,7 +247,7 @@ static int pagemap_range(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, struct mhp_params *params,
 	 * the CPU, we do want the linear mapping and thus use
 	 * arch_add_memory().
 	 */
-	if (pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE) {
+	if (is_private) {
 		error = add_pages(nid, PHYS_PFN(range->start),
 				PHYS_PFN(range_len(range)), params);
 	} else {
@@ -253,12 +257,6 @@ static int pagemap_range(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, struct mhp_params *params,
 			goto err_kasan;
 		}
 
-		if (!memhp_range_allowed(range->start, range_len(range), true)) {
-			error = -ERANGE;
-			mem_hotplug_done();
-			goto err_add_memory;
-		}
-
 		error = arch_add_memory(nid, range->start, range_len(range),
 					params);
 	}
-- 
2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-18 13:12 [PATCH V3 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Pre-validate the address range with platform Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-18 13:12 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Prevalidate the address range being added " Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-19 12:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-20  8:33     ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2021-01-20 10:41       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-20 11:58         ` Oscar Salvador
2021-01-21  9:23       ` Oscar Salvador
2021-01-22  9:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-22 10:41     ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-22 10:42       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-22 10:43         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-18 13:13 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] arm64/mm: Define arch_get_mappable_range() Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-19 12:24   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-18 13:13 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] s390/mm: " Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-19 12:26   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-20  8:28     ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-20 10:39       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-18 13:13 ` [PATCH RFC] virtio-mem: check against memhp_get_pluggable_range() which memory we can hotplug Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-18 13:21   ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-19 12:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-21  9:57     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-22  3:32       ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-19 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Pre-validate the address range with platform David Hildenbrand
2021-01-19 13:40   ` Oscar Salvador
2021-01-20  8:37     ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-22  6:04       ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-22  8:34         ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3d4f3b14-0715-b2b3-b015-04b8a77abfb8@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).