linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	nstange@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, yukuai3@huawei.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 15:23:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <749d56bd-1d66-e47b-a356-8d538e9c99b4@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200419194529.4872-5-mcgrof@kernel.org>

On 4/19/20 12:45 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> +/**
> + * blk_put_queue - decrement the request_queue refcount
> + *
> + * @q: the request_queue structure to decrement the refcount for
> + *

How about following the example from 
Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst and not leaving a blank line 
above the function argument documentation?

> + * Decrements the refcount to the request_queue kobject, when this reaches
                               ^^
                               of?
> + * 0 we'll have blk_release_queue() called. You should avoid calling
> + * this function in atomic context but if you really have to ensure you
> + * first refcount the block device with bdgrab() / bdput() so that the
> + * last decrement happens in blk_cleanup_queue().
> + */

Is calling bdgrab() and bdput() an option from a context in which it is 
not guaranteed that the block device is open?

Does every context that calls blk_put_queue() also call blk_cleanup_queue()?

How about avoiding confusion by changing the last sentence of that 
comment into something like the following: "The last reference must not 
be dropped from atomic context. If it is necessary to call 
blk_put_queue() from atomic context, make sure that that call does not 
decrease the request queue refcount to zero."

>   /**
>    * blk_cleanup_queue - shutdown a request queue
> + *
>    * @q: request queue to shutdown
>    *

How about following the example from 
Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst and not leaving a blank line 
above the function argument documentation?

>    * Mark @q DYING, drain all pending requests, mark @q DEAD, destroy and
>    * put it.  All future requests will be failed immediately with -ENODEV.
> + *
> + * You should not call this function in atomic context. If you need to
> + * refcount a request_queue in atomic context, instead refcount the
> + * block device with bdgrab() / bdput().

Surrounding blk_cleanup_queue() with bdgrab() / bdput() does not help. 
This blk_cleanup_queue() must not be called from atomic context.

>   /**
> - * __blk_release_queue - release a request queue
> - * @work: pointer to the release_work member of the request queue to be released
> + * blk_release_queue - release a request queue
> + *
> + * This function is called as part of the process when a block device is being
> + * unregistered. Releasing a request queue starts with blk_cleanup_queue(),
> + * which set the appropriate flags and then calls blk_put_queue() as the last
> + * step. blk_put_queue() decrements the reference counter of the request queue
> + * and once the reference counter reaches zero, this function is called to
> + * release all allocated resources of the request queue.
>    *
> - * Description:
> - *     This function is called when a block device is being unregistered. The
> - *     process of releasing a request queue starts with blk_cleanup_queue, which
> - *     set the appropriate flags and then calls blk_put_queue, that decrements
> - *     the reference counter of the request queue. Once the reference counter
> - *     of the request queue reaches zero, blk_release_queue is called to release
> - *     all allocated resources of the request queue.
> + * This function can sleep, and so we must ensure that the very last
> + * blk_put_queue() is never called from atomic context.
> + *
> + * @kobj: pointer to a kobject, who's container is a request_queue
>    */

Please follow the style used elsewhere in the kernel and move function 
argument documentation just below the line with the function name.

Thanks,

Bart.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-19 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-19 19:45 [PATCH v2 00/10] block: fix blktrace debugfs use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] block: move main block debugfs initialization to its own file Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 21:06   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-19 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] blktrace: move blktrace debugfs creation to helper function Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 21:11   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-22  7:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] blktrace: fix debugfs use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 21:55   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-20  0:04     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-20  0:38       ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-20 18:46         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-20 20:16   ` Greg KH
2020-04-20 20:41     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-21  7:00       ` Greg KH
2020-04-22  7:28         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-22  9:43           ` Ming Lei
2020-04-22 10:31             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-24 23:47             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-22  7:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-22  7:34         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-22  7:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-22  7:48     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-22  8:10       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-22  8:26         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 22:23   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-04-20 18:59     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-20 21:11       ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-20 21:51         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] blktrace: upgrade warns to BUG_ON() on unexpected circmunstances Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 22:50   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-19 23:07     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-20 23:20       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-19 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] blk-debugfs: upgrade warns to BUG_ON() if directory is already found Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-20 11:36   ` Greg KH
2020-04-25 11:43   ` [blk] 90d38c0e30: kernel_BUG_at_block/blk-debugfs.c kernel test robot
2020-04-19 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] blktrace: move debugfs file creation to its own function Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 22:55   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-20 11:37     ` Greg KH
2020-04-19 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] blktrace: add checks for created debugfs files on setup Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 22:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-19 23:05     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 23:17       ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-20 11:40         ` Greg KH
2020-04-20 18:44           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-20 20:11             ` Greg KH
2020-04-20 20:20               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-21  6:55                 ` Greg KH
2020-04-20 11:39   ` Greg KH
2020-04-19 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] block: panic if block debugfs dir is not created Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 23:08   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-20 11:38   ` Greg KH
2020-04-19 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] block: put_device() if device_add() fails Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 23:40   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-24 22:32     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-25  1:58       ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-25  2:12         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-19 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] block: fix blktrace debugfs use after free Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=749d56bd-1d66-e47b-a356-8d538e9c99b4@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nstange@suse.de \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).