From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>
Cc: kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
sthemmin@microsoft.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
jgross@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
osalvador@suse.de, malat@debian.org,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, jrdr.linux@gmail.com,
yasu.isimatu@gmail.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
aaron.lu@intel.com, devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, vatsa@codeaurora.org,
vinmenon@codeaurora.org, getarunks@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] memory_hotplug: Free pages as higher order
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:07:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97d8db4c-f117-8216-5f48-d5991692c867@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efb65160af41d0e18cb2dcb30c2fb86a@codeaurora.org>
On 10/10/18 6:56 PM, Arun KS wrote:
> On 2018-10-10 21:00, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 10/5/18 10:10 AM, Arun KS wrote:
>>> When free pages are done with higher order, time spend on
>>> coalescing pages by buddy allocator can be reduced. With
>>> section size of 256MB, hot add latency of a single section
>>> shows improvement from 50-60 ms to less than 1 ms, hence
>>> improving the hot add latency by 60%. Modify external
>>> providers of online callback to align with the change.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -655,26 +655,44 @@ void __online_page_free(struct page *page)
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__online_page_free);
>>>
>>> -static void generic_online_page(struct page *page)
>>> +static int generic_online_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
>>> {
>>> - __online_page_set_limits(page);
>>
>> This is now not called anymore, although the xen/hv variants still do
>> it. The function seems empty these days, maybe remove it as a followup
>> cleanup?
>>
>>> - __online_page_increment_counters(page);
>>> - __online_page_free(page);
>>> + __free_pages_core(page, order);
>>> + totalram_pages += (1UL << order);
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
>>> + if (PageHighMem(page))
>>> + totalhigh_pages += (1UL << order);
>>> +#endif
>>
>> __online_page_increment_counters() would have used
>> adjust_managed_page_count() which would do the changes under
>> managed_page_count_lock. Are we safe without the lock? If yes, there
>> should perhaps be a comment explaining why.
>
> Looks unsafe without managed_page_count_lock. I think better have a
> similar implementation of free_boot_core() in memory_hotplug.c like we
> had in version 1 of patch. And use adjust_managed_page_count() instead
> of page_zone(page)->managed_pages += nr_pages;
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/989445/
Looks like deferred_free_range() has the same problem calling
__free_pages_core() to adjust zone->managed_pages. I expect
__free_pages_bootmem() is OK because at that point the system is still
single-threaded?
Could be solved by moving that out of __free_pages_core().
But do we care about readers potentially seeing a store tear? If yes
then maybe these counters should be converted to atomics...
> -static void generic_online_page(struct page *page)
> +static int generic_online_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> {
> - __online_page_set_limits(page);
> - __online_page_increment_counters(page);
> - __online_page_free(page);
> + unsigned long nr_pages = 1 << order;
> + struct page *p = page;
> +
> + for (loop = 0 ; loop < nr_pages ; loop++, p++) {
> + __ClearPageReserved(p);
> + set_page_count(p, 0);
> + }
> +
> + adjust_managed_page_count(page, nr_pages);
> + set_page_refcounted(page);
> + __free_pages(page, order);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
>
>
> Regards,
> Arun
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-11 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-05 8:10 [PATCH v5 1/2] memory_hotplug: Free pages as higher order Arun KS
2018-10-05 8:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] mm/page_alloc: remove software prefetching in __free_pages_core Arun KS
2018-10-09 9:30 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-10 16:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-08 7:34 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] memory_hotplug: Free pages as higher order Oscar Salvador
2018-10-09 9:29 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-09 9:54 ` Arun KS
2018-10-09 11:06 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-10 8:07 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-10-10 10:51 ` Arun KS
2018-10-10 11:01 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-10-10 15:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-10 16:56 ` Arun KS
2018-10-10 17:33 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-11 2:29 ` Arun KS
2018-10-11 7:55 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-19 2:18 ` Andrew Morton
2018-10-19 8:07 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-22 10:33 ` Arun KS
2018-11-05 9:42 ` Arun KS
2018-11-05 21:44 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-06 5:31 ` Arun KS
2018-10-11 8:07 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2018-10-11 8:15 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 22:15 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97d8db4c-f117-8216-5f48-d5991692c867@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=getarunks@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jrdr.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=malat@debian.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=vatsa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).