From: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"Zach O'Keefe" <zokeefe@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/khugepaged: Fix ->anon_vma race
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:12:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkpAVTys9dBSodHBB3ovKhwP8imUsyXy=aPqY5SyXCT7ww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230112085649.gvriasb2t5xwmxkm@box.shutemov.name>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:56 AM Kirill A. Shutemov
<kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 02:33:51PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
> > If an ->anon_vma is attached to the VMA, collapse_and_free_pmd() requires
> > it to be locked. retract_page_tables() bails out if an ->anon_vma is
> > attached, but does this check before holding the mmap lock (as the comment
> > above the check explains).
> >
> > If we racily merge an existing ->anon_vma (shared with a child process)
> > from a neighboring VMA, subsequent rmap traversals on pages belonging to
> > the child will be able to see the page tables that we are concurrently
> > removing while assuming that nothing else can access them.
> >
> > Repeat the ->anon_vma check once we hold the mmap lock to ensure that there
> > really is no concurrent page table access.
> >
> > Reported-by: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
> > Fixes: f3f0e1d2150b ("khugepaged: add support of collapse for tmpfs/shmem pages")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> > ---
> > zokeefe@ pointed out to me that the current code (after my last round of patches)
> > can hit a lockdep assert by racing, and after staring at it a bit I've
> > convinced myself that this is a real, preexisting bug.
> > (I haven't written a reproducer for it though. One way to hit it might be
> > something along the lines of:
> >
> > - set up a process A with a private-file-mapping VMA V1
> > - let A fork() to create process B, thereby copying V1 in A to V1' in B
> > - let B extend the end of V1'
> > - let B put some anon pages into the extended part of V1'
>
> At this point V1' gets it's own ->anon_vma, not connected to V1, right?
This is what I got confused too.
>
> > - let A map a new private-file-mapping VMA V2 directly behind V1, without
> > an anon_vma
> > [race begins here]
> > - in A's thread 1: begin retract_page_tables() on V2, run through first
> > ->anon_vma check
> > - in A's thread 2: run __anon_vma_prepare() on V2 and ensure that it
> > merges the anon_vma of V1 (which implies V1 and V2 must be mapping the
> > same file at compatible offsets)
> > - in B: trigger rmap traversal on anon page in V1'
>
> I don't follow the race. rmap on V1' will not reach V1.
>
> > mm/khugepaged.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > index 5cb401aa2b9d..0bfed37f3a3b 100644
> > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > @@ -1644,7 +1644,7 @@ static int retract_page_tables(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t pgoff,
> > * has higher cost too. It would also probably require locking
> > * the anon_vma.
> > */
> > - if (vma->anon_vma) {
> > + if (READ_ONCE(vma->anon_vma)) {
> > result = SCAN_PAGE_ANON;
> > goto next;
> > }
>
> This makes perfect sense. At least for readability. But I think
> false-negative should not lead to bad results.
>
> > @@ -1672,6 +1672,18 @@ static int retract_page_tables(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t pgoff,
> > result = SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE;
> > if ((cc->is_khugepaged || is_target) &&
> > mmap_write_trylock(mm)) {
> > + /*
> > + * Re-check whether we have an ->anon_vma, because
> > + * collapse_and_free_pmd() requires that either no
> > + * ->anon_vma exists or the anon_vma is locked.
> > + * We already checked ->anon_vma above, but that check
> > + * is racy because ->anon_vma can be populated under the
> > + * mmap lock in read mode.
> > + */
> > + if (vma->anon_vma) {
> > + result = SCAN_PAGE_ANON;
> > + goto unlock_next;
> > + }
>
> This is totally wrong direction. Or I don't understand the race.
>
> At this point we already paid nearly all price of of pagetable retraction.
> I don't see any correctness reason to stop here, except for the assert.
Isn't it possible that collapse_and_free_pmd() clear the pmd which may
point to a PTE which maps the COW'ed anon page if this race happens?
>
> I think lockdep assert in collapse_and_free_pmd() is wrong and has to be
> dropped.
>
> > /*
> > * When a vma is registered with uffd-wp, we can't
> > * recycle the pmd pgtable because there can be pte
> >
> > base-commit: 7dd4b804e08041ff56c88bdd8da742d14b17ed25
> > --
> > 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog
> >
>
> --
> Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-12 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-11 13:33 [PATCH] mm/khugepaged: Fix ->anon_vma race Jann Horn
2023-01-12 1:06 ` Yang Shi
2023-01-13 19:36 ` Jann Horn
2023-01-12 8:56 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-01-12 18:12 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2023-01-13 0:10 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-01-13 3:22 ` Yang Shi
2023-01-13 19:28 ` Jann Horn
2023-01-15 19:06 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-01-16 12:06 ` Jann Horn
2023-01-16 12:34 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-01-16 12:54 ` Jann Horn
2023-01-16 13:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-16 13:47 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-01-23 11:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-24 0:51 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-01-24 10:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-17 18:57 ` Yang Shi
2023-01-17 19:12 ` Jann Horn
2023-01-17 22:55 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHbLzkpAVTys9dBSodHBB3ovKhwP8imUsyXy=aPqY5SyXCT7ww@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).