From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: Introduce mm_struct.has_pinned
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:36:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgu+6Cx_=U1Vh4Fzm97JA1k76fS905uEAVK-2eJ_1KukQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200928183928.GR9916@ziepe.ca>
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:39 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> wrote:
>
> All of gup_fast and copy_mm could be wrappered in a seq count so that
> gup_fast always goes to the slow path if fork is concurrent.
>
> That doesn't sound too expensive and avoids all the problems you
> pointed with the WP scheme.
Ok, I'll start by just removing the "write protect early trick". It
really doesn't work reliably anyway due to memory ordering, and while
I think the dirty bit is ok (and we could probably also set it
unconditionally to make _sure_ it's not dropped like Peter says) it
just makes me convinced it's the wrong approach.
Fixing it at a per-pte level is too expensive, and yeah, if we really
really care about the fork consistency, the sequence count approach
should be much simpler and more obvious.
So I'll do the pte wrprotect/restore removal. Anybody willing to do
and test the sequence count approach?
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-28 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-21 21:17 [PATCH 0/5] mm: Break COW for pinned pages during fork() Peter Xu
2020-09-21 21:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: Introduce mm_struct.has_pinned Peter Xu
2020-09-21 21:43 ` Jann Horn
2020-09-21 22:30 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-21 22:47 ` Jann Horn
2020-09-22 11:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-22 14:28 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 15:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-22 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-21 23:53 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-22 0:01 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-22 15:17 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 16:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-22 17:54 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 19:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-23 0:27 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-23 13:10 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-23 14:20 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-23 17:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-24 7:44 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-24 14:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-24 14:45 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-23 17:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-24 14:35 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-24 16:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-24 17:55 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-24 18:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-24 18:34 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-24 18:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-24 21:30 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-25 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-25 21:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-26 0:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-26 1:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-26 22:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-27 6:23 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-27 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-27 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-28 12:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-28 16:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-28 17:22 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-28 17:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-28 18:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-28 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-28 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-29 0:18 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-28 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2020-09-28 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-28 22:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-29 0:30 ` Peter Xu
2020-10-08 5:49 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-28 17:13 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-25 21:13 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-25 22:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-22 18:02 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-22 18:15 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 19:11 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-27 0:41 ` [mm] 698ac7610f: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops 8.2% improvement kernel test robot
2020-09-21 21:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/fork: Pass new vma pointer into copy_page_range() Peter Xu
2020-09-21 21:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: Rework return value for copy_one_pte() Peter Xu
2020-09-22 7:11 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-22 15:29 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 10:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-22 10:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-22 15:36 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 15:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-22 16:03 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 16:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-22 18:13 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 18:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-22 18:49 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-23 6:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-23 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-23 21:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-21 21:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes Peter Xu
2020-09-21 21:55 ` Jann Horn
2020-09-21 22:18 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-21 22:27 ` Jann Horn
2020-09-22 0:08 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-21 22:27 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 11:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-22 12:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-22 15:58 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 16:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-22 18:34 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 18:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-23 1:03 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-23 20:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-24 15:08 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-24 11:48 ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-09-24 15:16 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-21 21:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/thp: Split huge pmds/puds if they're pinned when fork() Peter Xu
2020-09-22 6:41 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-22 10:33 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-22 20:01 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-23 9:22 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-23 13:50 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-23 14:01 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-23 15:44 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-23 20:19 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-24 18:49 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-23 16:06 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-22 12:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-23 15:24 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-23 16:07 ` Yang Shi
2020-09-24 15:47 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-24 17:29 ` Yang Shi
2020-09-23 17:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-23 10:21 ` [PATCH 0/5] mm: Break COW for pinned pages during fork() Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-23 15:37 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wgu+6Cx_=U1Vh4Fzm97JA1k76fS905uEAVK-2eJ_1KukQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).