linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch 1/4] mm/sparse: consistently do not zero memmap
@ 2019-11-22  1:53 akpm
  2019-11-22 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: akpm @ 2019-11-22  1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, linux-mm, mhocko, mm-commits, osalvador,
	pasha.tatashin, torvalds, vincent.whitchurch

From: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Subject: mm/sparse: consistently do not zero memmap

sparsemem without VMEMMAP has two allocation paths to allocate the memory
needed for its memmap (done in sparse_mem_map_populate()).

In one allocation path (sparse_buffer_alloc() succeeds), the memory is not
zeroed (since it was previously allocated with
memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw()).

In the other allocation path (sparse_buffer_alloc() fails and
sparse_mem_map_populate() falls back to memblock_alloc_try_nid()), the
memory is zeroed.

AFAICS this difference does not appear to be on purpose.  If the code is
supposed to work with non-initialized memory (__init_single_page() takes
care of zeroing the struct pages which are actually used), we should
consistently not zero the memory, to avoid masking bugs.

(I noticed this because on my ARM64 platform, with 1 GiB of memory the
 first [and only] section is allocated from the zeroing path while with
 2 GiB of memory the first 1 GiB section is allocated from the
 non-zeroing path.)

Michal: "the main user visible problem is a memory wastage.  The overal
amount of memory should be small.  I wouldn't call it stable material."

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191030131122.8256-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com
Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/sparse.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/mm/sparse.c~mm-sparse-consistently-do-not-zero-memmap
+++ a/mm/sparse.c
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ struct page __init *__populate_section_m
 	if (map)
 		return map;
 
-	map = memblock_alloc_try_nid(size,
+	map = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(size,
 					  PAGE_SIZE, addr,
 					  MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
 	if (!map)
_


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch 1/4] mm/sparse: consistently do not zero memmap
  2019-11-22  1:53 [patch 1/4] mm/sparse: consistently do not zero memmap akpm
@ 2019-11-22 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2019-11-22 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: David Hildenbrand, Linux-MM, Michal Hocko, mm-commits, osalvador,
	pasha.tatashin, Vincent Whitchurch

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:53 PM <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> AFAICS this difference does not appear to be on purpose.  If the code is
> supposed to work with non-initialized memory (__init_single_page() takes
> care of zeroing the struct pages which are actually used), we should
> consistently not zero the memory, to avoid masking bugs.
>

This does not seem to be an actual fix, and I will not apply it this
late in the rc game.

Andrew, please stop sending cleanups as "fixes".

                 Linus


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-22 17:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-11-22  1:53 [patch 1/4] mm/sparse: consistently do not zero memmap akpm
2019-11-22 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).