* [PATCH v2] perf script python: integrate page reclaim analyze script
@ 2019-10-01 3:19 Yafang Shao
2019-10-01 14:45 ` Mel Gorman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yafang Shao @ 2019-10-01 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tonyj, mgorman, acme, peterz, mingo, alexander.shishkin, jolsa,
namhyung, akpm
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, Yafang Shao, Tony Jones
A new perf script page-reclaim is introduced in this patch. This new script
is used to report the page reclaim details. The possible usage of this
script is as bellow,
- identify latency spike caused by direct reclaim
- whehter the latency spike is relevant with pageout
- why is page reclaim requested, i.e. whether it is because of memory
fragmentation
- page reclaim efficiency
etc
In the future we may also enhance it to analyze the memcg reclaim.
Bellow is how to use this script,
# Record, one of the following
$ perf record -e 'vmscan:mm_vmscan_*' ./workload
$ perf script record page-reclaim
# Report
$ perf script report page-reclaim
# Report per process latency
$ perf script report page-reclaim -- -p
# Report per process latency details. At what time and how long it
# stalls at each time.
$ perf script report page-reclaim -- -v
An example of doing mmtests,
$ perf script report page-reclaim
Direct reclaims: 4924
Direct latency (ms) total max avg min
177823.211 6378.977 36.114 0.051
Direct file reclaimed 22920
Direct file scanned 28306
Direct file sync write I/O 0
Direct file async write I/O 0
Direct anon reclaimed 212567
Direct anon scanned 1446854
Direct anon sync write I/O 0
Direct anon async write I/O 278325
Direct order 0 1 3
4870 23 31
Wake kswapd requests 716
Wake order 0 1
715 1
Kswapd reclaims: 9
Kswapd latency (ms) total max avg min
86353.046 42128.816 9594.783 120.736
Kswapd file reclaimed 366461
Kswapd file scanned 369554
Kswapd file sync write I/O 0
Kswapd file async write I/O 0
Kswapd anon reclaimed 362594
Kswapd anon scanned 693938
Kswapd anon sync write I/O 0
Kswapd anon async write I/O 330663
Kswapd order 0 1 3
3 1 5
Kswapd re-wakes 705
$ perf script report page-reclaim -- -p
# besides the above basic output, it will also summary per task
# latency
Per process latency (ms):
pid[comm] total max avg min
1[systemd] 276.764 248.933 21.29 0.293
163[kswapd0] 86353.046 42128.816 9594.783 120.736
7241[bash] 12787.749 859.091 94.028 0.163
1592[master] 81.604 70.811 27.201 2.906
1595[pickup] 496.162 374.168 165.387 14.478
1098[auditd] 19.32 19.32 19.32 19.32
1120[irqbalance] 5232.331 1386.352 158.555 0.169
7236[usemem] 79649.04 1763.281 24.921 0.051
1605[sshd] 1344.41 645.125 34.472 0.16
7238[bash] 1158.92 1023.307 231.784 0.067
7239[bash] 15100.776 993.447 82.069 0.145
...
$ per script report page-reclaim -- -v
# Besides the basic output, it will asl show per task latency details
Per process latency (ms):
pid[comm] total max avg min
timestamp latency(ns)
1[systemd] 276.764 248.933 21.29 0.293
3406860552338: 16819800
3406877381650: 5532855
3407458799399: 929517
3407459796042: 916682
3407460763220: 418989
3407461250236: 332355
3407461637534: 401731
3407462092234: 449219
3407462605855: 292857
3407462952343: 372700
3407463364947: 414880
3407463829547: 949162
3407464813883: 248933444
163[kswapd0] 86353.046 42128.816 9594.783 120.736
3357637025977: 1026962745
3358915619888: 41268642175
3400239664127: 42128816204
3443784780373: 679641989
3444847948969: 120735792
3445001978784: 342713657
3445835850664: 316851589
3446865035476: 247457873
3449355401352: 221223878
...
This script must be in sync with bellow vmscan tracepoints,
mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin
mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end
mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake
mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep
mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd
mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive
mm_vmscan_writepage
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
v1->v2: verified it with python2.7 and python3.6.
add vmscan tracepoints comments in this script
---
tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/page-reclaim-record | 2 +
tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/page-reclaim-report | 4 +
tools/perf/scripts/python/page-reclaim.py | 393 ++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 399 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/page-reclaim-record
create mode 100644 tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/page-reclaim-report
create mode 100644 tools/perf/scripts/python/page-reclaim.py
diff --git a/tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/page-reclaim-record b/tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/page-reclaim-record
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5a16a23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/page-reclaim-record
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+perf record -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_writepage $@
diff --git a/tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/page-reclaim-report b/tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/page-reclaim-report
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b74e197
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/page-reclaim-report
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+#description: display page reclaim details
+#args: [-h] [-p] [-v]
+perf script -s "$PERF_EXEC_PATH"/scripts/python/page-reclaim.py $@
diff --git a/tools/perf/scripts/python/page-reclaim.py b/tools/perf/scripts/python/page-reclaim.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..df40d79
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/scripts/python/page-reclaim.py
@@ -0,0 +1,393 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Perf script to help analyze page reclaim with vmscan tracepoints
+# e.g. to capture the latency spike caused by direct reclaim.
+#
+# This script must be in sync with bellow vmscan tracepoints,
+# mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin
+# mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end
+# mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake
+# mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep
+# mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd
+# mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive
+# mm_vmscan_writepage
+#
+# This script is motivated by Mel's trace-vmscan-postprocess.pl.
+#
+# Author: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
+
+import os
+import sys
+import getopt
+import signal
+
+signal.signal(signal.SIGPIPE, signal.SIG_DFL)
+
+usage = "usage: perf script report page-reclaim -- [-h] [-p] [-v]\n"
+
+latency_metric = ['total', 'max', 'avg', 'min']
+reclaim_path = ['Kswapd', 'Direct']
+sync_io = ['async', 'sync']
+lru = ['anon', 'file']
+
+class Show:
+ DEFAULT = 0
+ PROCCESS = 1
+ VERBOSE = 2
+
+show_opt = Show.DEFAULT
+
+def ns(sec, nsec):
+ return (sec * 1000000000) + nsec
+
+def ns_to_ms(ns):
+ return round(ns / 1000000.0, 3)
+
+# Format:
+# title valueX valueY
+def print_list_in_line(__list, title, padding):
+ line = title
+ for v in __list:
+ line += str(v).rjust(padding)
+
+ print(line)
+
+# Format:
+# title nameX nameY
+# valueX valueY
+def print_list_in_table(__list, title, padding):
+ width = len(title) + 1
+ header = title.ljust(width)
+ line = ''.ljust(width)
+
+ for v in __list:
+ header += str(v[0]).rjust(padding)
+ line += str(v[1]).rjust(padding)
+
+ print(header)
+ print(line)
+
+class Trace:
+ def __init__(self, secs, nsecs):
+ self.begin = ns(secs, nsecs)
+
+ def complete(self, secs, nsecs):
+ self.ns = ns(secs, nsecs) - self.begin
+
+class Stat:
+ def __init__(self):
+ self.stats = {}
+ self.stats['file'] = {}
+ self.stats['file']['reclaimed'] = 0
+ self.stats['file']['scanned'] = 0
+ self.stats['file']['sync'] = 0
+ self.stats['file']['async'] = 0
+ self.stats['anon'] = {}
+ self.stats['anon']['reclaimed'] = 0
+ self.stats['anon']['scanned'] = 0
+ self.stats['anon']['sync'] = 0
+ self.stats['anon']['async'] = 0
+
+ # including reclaimed slab caches
+ self.stats['reclaimed'] = 0
+
+ # The MAX_ORDER in kernel is configurable
+ self.stats['order'] = {}
+
+ self.stats['latency'] = {}
+ self.stats['latency']['total'] = 0.0
+ self.stats['latency']['max'] = 0.0
+ self.stats['latency']['avg'] = 0.0
+ self.stats['latency']['min'] = float("inf")
+ self.stats['count'] = 0
+
+ def add_latency(self, val, order):
+ self.stats['latency']['total'] += val
+ _max = self.stats['latency']['max']
+ _min = self.stats['latency']['min']
+ if val > _max:
+ self.stats['latency']['max'] = val
+ if val < _min:
+ self.stats['latency']['min'] = val
+
+ self.stats['count'] += 1
+ self.stats['order'][order] = self.stats['order'].get(order, 0) + 1
+
+ def add_page(self, _lru, scanned, reclaimed):
+ self.stats[_lru]['scanned'] += scanned
+ self.stats[_lru]['reclaimed'] += reclaimed
+
+ def inc_write_io(self, _lru, _io):
+ self.stats[_lru][_io] += 1
+
+ def convert_latency(self):
+ count = self.stats['count']
+ if count:
+ self.stats['latency']['avg'] = \
+ self.stats['latency']['total'] / count
+ for i, v in self.stats['latency'].items():
+ self.stats['latency'][i] = ns_to_ms(v)
+
+ latency_list = sorted(self.stats['latency'].items(),
+ key=lambda i:latency_metric.index(i[0]))
+
+ return latency_list
+
+ def show_stats(self, key):
+ count = self.stats['count']
+ print("%s reclaims: %d" % (key, count))
+
+ # Format latency output
+ # Print latencys in milliseconds:
+ # title total max avg min
+ # v v v v
+ latency_list = self.convert_latency()
+ print_list_in_table(latency_list, key + " latency (ms)", 12)
+
+ for _lru in ['file', 'anon']:
+ for action in ['reclaimed', 'scanned']:
+ print("%s %s %s %d" % (key, _lru, action, self.stats[_lru][action]))
+ for _io in ['sync', 'async']:
+ print("%s %s %s write I/O %d" % (key, _lru, _io, self.stats[_lru][_io]))
+
+ # Format order output
+ # Similar with /proc/buddyinfo:
+ # title order-N ...
+ # v ...
+ # N.B. v is a non-zero value
+ order_list = sorted(self.stats['order'].items())
+ print_list_in_table(order_list, key + ' order', 6)
+
+class Vmscan:
+ events = {}
+ stat = {}
+ stat['Direct'] = Stat()
+ stat['Kswapd'] = Stat()
+ # for re-wake the kswapd
+ rewake = 0
+
+ @classmethod
+ def direct_begin(cls, pid, comm, start_secs, start_nsecs, order):
+ event = cls.events.get(pid)
+ if event is None:
+ #new vmscan instance
+ event = cls.events[pid] = Vmscan(comm, pid)
+ event.vmscan_trace_begin(start_secs, start_nsecs, order, 1)
+
+ @classmethod
+ def direct_end(cls, pid, secs, nsecs, reclaimed):
+ event = cls.events.get(pid)
+ if event and event.tracing():
+ event.vmscan_trace_end(secs, nsecs)
+
+ @classmethod
+ def kswapd_wake(cls, pid, comm, start_secs, start_nsecs, order):
+ event = cls.events.get(pid)
+ if event is None:
+ # new vmscan instance
+ event = cls.events[pid] = Vmscan(comm, pid)
+
+ if event.tracing() is False:
+ event.vmscan_trace_begin(start_secs, start_nsecs, order, 0)
+ # kswapd is already running
+ else:
+ cls.rewake_kswapd(order)
+
+ @classmethod
+ def rewake_kswapd(cls, order):
+ cls.rewake += 1
+
+ @classmethod
+ def show_rewakes(cls):
+ print("Kswapd re-wakes %d" % (cls.rewake))
+
+ @classmethod
+ def kswapd_sleep(cls, pid, secs, nsecs):
+ event = cls.events.get(pid)
+ if event and event.tracing():
+ event.vmscan_trace_end(secs, nsecs)
+
+ @classmethod
+ def shrink_inactive(cls, pid, scanned, reclaimed, flags):
+ event = cls.events.get(pid)
+ if event and event.tracing():
+ # RECLAIM_WB_ANON 0x1
+ # RECLAIM_WB_FILE 0x2
+ _type = (flags & 0x2) >> 1
+ event.process_lru(lru[_type], scanned, reclaimed)
+
+ @classmethod
+ def writepage(cls, pid, flags):
+ event = cls.events.get(pid)
+ if event and event.tracing():
+ # RECLAIM_WB_ANON 0x1
+ # RECLAIM_WB_FILE 0x2
+ # RECLAIM_WB_SYNC 0x4
+ # RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC 0x8
+ _type = (flags & 0x2) >> 1
+ _io = (flags & 0x4) >> 2
+
+ event.process_writepage(lru[_type], sync_io[_io])
+
+ @classmethod
+ def iterate_proc(cls):
+ if show_opt != Show.DEFAULT:
+ print("\nPer process latency (ms):")
+ _str = 'pid'.rjust(8) + '[comm]'.ljust(12)
+ print_list_in_line(latency_metric, _str, 12)
+
+ if show_opt == Show.VERBOSE:
+ print("%20s %s" % ('timestamp','latency(ns)'))
+
+ for i in cls.events:
+ yield cls.events[i]
+
+ def __init__(self, comm, pid):
+ self.comm = comm
+ self.pid = pid
+ self.trace = None
+ self._list = []
+ self.stat = Stat()
+ self.direct = 0
+ self.order = 0
+
+ def vmscan_trace_begin(self, secs, nsecs, order, direct):
+ self.trace = Trace(secs, nsecs)
+ self.direct = direct
+ self.order = order
+
+ def vmscan_trace_end(self, secs, nsecs):
+ path = reclaim_path[self.direct]
+ self.trace.complete(secs, nsecs)
+
+ Vmscan.stat[path].add_latency(self.trace.ns, self.order)
+ if show_opt != Show.DEFAULT:
+ self.stat.add_latency(self.trace.ns, self.order)
+ if show_opt == Show.VERBOSE:
+ self._list.append(self.trace)
+
+ self.trace = None
+
+ def process_lru(self, lru, scanned, reclaimed):
+ path = reclaim_path[self.direct]
+ Vmscan.stat[path].add_page(lru, scanned, reclaimed)
+
+ def process_writepage(self, lru, io):
+ path = reclaim_path[self.direct]
+ Vmscan.stat[path].inc_write_io(lru, io)
+
+ def tracing(self):
+ return self.trace != None
+
+ def display_proc(self):
+ self.stat.convert_latency()
+ _list = sorted(list(self.stat.stats['latency'].values()), reverse = True)
+ if _list:
+ comm = '[' + self.comm[0:10] + ']'
+ proc = str(self.pid).rjust(8) + comm.ljust(12)
+ print_list_in_line(_list, proc, 12)
+
+ def display_proc_detail(self):
+ if show_opt == Show.VERBOSE:
+ for i, v in enumerate(self._list):
+ print("%20d: %d" % (v.begin, v.ns))
+
+# Wake kswpad request
+class Wakeup:
+ wakes = 0
+ orders = {}
+
+ @classmethod
+ def wakeup_kswapd(cls, order):
+ cls.wakes += 1
+ cls.orders[order] = cls.orders.get(order, 0) + 1
+
+ @classmethod
+ def show_wakes(cls):
+ print("Wake kswapd requests %d" % (cls.wakes))
+
+ order_list = sorted(cls.orders.items())
+ print_list_in_table(order_list, 'Wake order', 6)
+
+def trace_end():
+ Vmscan.stat['Direct'].show_stats('Direct')
+ Wakeup.show_wakes()
+ print('')
+
+ Vmscan.stat['Kswapd'].show_stats('Kswapd')
+ Vmscan.show_rewakes()
+
+ # show process details if requested
+ for i in Vmscan.iterate_proc():
+ i.display_proc(),
+ i.display_proc_detail()
+
+def vmscan__mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin(event_name, context, common_cpu,
+ common_secs, common_nsecs, common_pid, common_comm,
+ common_callchain, order, gfp_flags):
+
+ Vmscan.direct_begin(common_pid, common_comm, common_secs,
+ common_nsecs, order)
+
+def vmscan__mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end(event_name, context, common_cpu,
+ common_secs, common_nsecs, common_pid, common_comm,
+ common_callchain, nr_reclaimed):
+
+ Vmscan.direct_end(common_pid, common_secs, common_nsecs, nr_reclaimed)
+
+def vmscan__mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake(event_name, context, common_cpu,
+ common_secs, common_nsecs, common_pid, common_comm,
+ common_callchain, nid, zid, order):
+
+ Vmscan.kswapd_wake(common_pid, common_comm, common_secs, common_nsecs, order)
+
+def vmscan__mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep(event_name, context, common_cpu,
+ common_secs, common_nsecs, common_pid, common_comm,
+ common_callchain, nid):
+
+ Vmscan.kswapd_sleep(common_pid, common_secs, common_nsecs)
+
+def vmscan__mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd(event_name, context, common_cpu,
+ common_secs, common_nsecs, common_pid, common_comm,
+ common_callchain, nid, zid, order, gfp_flags):
+
+ Wakeup.wakeup_kswapd(order)
+
+def vmscan__mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(event_name, context, common_cpu,
+ common_secs, common_nsecs, common_pid, common_comm,
+ common_callchain, nid, nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed, nr_dirty,
+ nr_writeback, nr_congested, nr_immediate, nr_activate_anon,
+ nr_activate_file, nr_ref_keep, nr_unmap_fail, priority, flags):
+
+ Vmscan.shrink_inactive(common_pid, nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed, flags)
+
+def vmscan__mm_vmscan_writepage(event_name, context, common_cpu,
+ common_secs, common_nsecs, common_pid, common_comm,
+ common_callchain, pfn, reclaim_flags):
+
+ Vmscan.writepage(common_pid, reclaim_flags)
+
+def print_help():
+ global usage
+ print(usage)
+ print(" -p show process latency (ms)")
+ print(" -v show process latency (ns) with timestamp")
+
+def option_parse():
+ try:
+ opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], "pvh")
+ except getopt.GetoptError:
+ print('Bad option!')
+ exit(1)
+
+ global show_opt
+ for opt, arg in opts:
+ if opt == "-h":
+ print_help()
+ exit(0)
+ elif opt == "-p":
+ show_opt = Show.PROCCESS
+ elif opt == '-v':
+ show_opt = Show.VERBOSE
+
+option_parse()
+
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf script python: integrate page reclaim analyze script
2019-10-01 3:19 [PATCH v2] perf script python: integrate page reclaim analyze script Yafang Shao
@ 2019-10-01 14:45 ` Mel Gorman
2019-10-02 4:59 ` Yafang Shao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2019-10-01 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yafang Shao
Cc: tonyj, acme, peterz, mingo, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, namhyung,
akpm, linux-kernel, linux-mm, Tony Jones
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:19:44PM -0400, Yafang Shao wrote:
> A new perf script page-reclaim is introduced in this patch. This new script
> is used to report the page reclaim details. The possible usage of this
> script is as bellow,
> - identify latency spike caused by direct reclaim
> - whehter the latency spike is relevant with pageout
> - why is page reclaim requested, i.e. whether it is because of memory
> fragmentation
> - page reclaim efficiency
> etc
> In the future we may also enhance it to analyze the memcg reclaim.
>
Hi,
I ended up not reviewing this patch in detail simply because I would
approach the same class of problem in an entirely different way today.
There is value in accumulating the stats in a report like this;
> $ perf script report page-reclaim
> Direct reclaims: 4924
> Direct latency (ms) total max avg min
> 177823.211 6378.977 36.114 0.051
> Direct file reclaimed 22920
> Direct file scanned 28306
> Direct file sync write I/O 0
> Direct file async write I/O 0
> Direct anon reclaimed 212567
> Direct anon scanned 1446854
> Direct anon sync write I/O 0
> Direct anon async write I/O 278325
> Direct order 0 1 3
> 4870 23 31
> Wake kswapd requests 716
> Wake order 0 1
> 715 1
>
> Kswapd reclaims: 9
However, the basic option I would prefer is having the raw latency
information for Direct latency that can be externally parsed by R or any
other statistical method. The reason why is because knowing the max latency
is not enough, I'd want to know the spread of latencies and whether they
were clustered at a point of time or spread out over long periods of
time. I would then build the higher-level reports on top if necessary.
Today, I would also have considered getting the latency figures using eBPF
or systemtap instead although having perf do it may be useful too. That's
not universally popular though so at minimum I would have;
perf script record page-reclaim -- capture all page-reclaim tracepoints
perf script report page-reclaim -- For reclaim entry/exit, merge the two
tracepoints into one that reports latency. Dump the rest out
verbatim
For latencies, I would externally post-process them until such time as I
found a common class of bug that needed a high-level report and then
build the perf script support for it.
Please note that I did not spot anything wrong with your script, it's
just that I would not use it myself in its current format for debugging
a reclaim-related problem.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf script python: integrate page reclaim analyze script
2019-10-01 14:45 ` Mel Gorman
@ 2019-10-02 4:59 ` Yafang Shao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yafang Shao @ 2019-10-02 4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman
Cc: tonyj, acme, Peter Zijlstra, mingo, alexander.shishkin, jolsa,
namhyung, Andrew Morton, LKML, Linux MM, Tony Jones
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:45 PM Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:19:44PM -0400, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > A new perf script page-reclaim is introduced in this patch. This new script
> > is used to report the page reclaim details. The possible usage of this
> > script is as bellow,
> > - identify latency spike caused by direct reclaim
> > - whehter the latency spike is relevant with pageout
> > - why is page reclaim requested, i.e. whether it is because of memory
> > fragmentation
> > - page reclaim efficiency
> > etc
> > In the future we may also enhance it to analyze the memcg reclaim.
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> I ended up not reviewing this patch in detail simply because I would
> approach the same class of problem in an entirely different way today.
> There is value in accumulating the stats in a report like this;
>
> > $ perf script report page-reclaim
> > Direct reclaims: 4924
> > Direct latency (ms) total max avg min
> > 177823.211 6378.977 36.114 0.051
> > Direct file reclaimed 22920
> > Direct file scanned 28306
> > Direct file sync write I/O 0
> > Direct file async write I/O 0
> > Direct anon reclaimed 212567
> > Direct anon scanned 1446854
> > Direct anon sync write I/O 0
> > Direct anon async write I/O 278325
> > Direct order 0 1 3
> > 4870 23 31
> > Wake kswapd requests 716
> > Wake order 0 1
> > 715 1
> >
> > Kswapd reclaims: 9
>
> However, the basic option I would prefer is having the raw latency
> information for Direct latency that can be externally parsed by R or any
> other statistical method. The reason why is because knowing the max latency
> is not enough, I'd want to know the spread of latencies and whether they
> were clustered at a point of time or spread out over long periods of
> time. I would then build the higher-level reports on top if necessary.
>
> Today, I would also have considered getting the latency figures using eBPF
> or systemtap instead although having perf do it may be useful too. That's
> not universally popular though so at minimum I would have;
>
eBPF requires newer kernel, while there're still lots of servers
running with old kernels.
The systemtap is not convenient as it requires many debug packages,
and it is still not stable enough to run on the product environment,
for example, the systemtap deamon may exit without uninstalling the
systemtap kernel module.
> perf script record page-reclaim -- capture all page-reclaim tracepoints
> perf script report page-reclaim -- For reclaim entry/exit, merge the two
> tracepoints into one that reports latency. Dump the rest out
> verbatim
>
> For latencies, I would externally post-process them until such time as I
> found a common class of bug that needed a high-level report and then
> build the perf script support for it.
>
This seem like a good suggestion.
I will try to think about it.
> Please note that I did not spot anything wrong with your script, it's
> just that I would not use it myself in its current format for debugging
> a reclaim-related problem.
>
> --
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-02 4:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-01 3:19 [PATCH v2] perf script python: integrate page reclaim analyze script Yafang Shao
2019-10-01 14:45 ` Mel Gorman
2019-10-02 4:59 ` Yafang Shao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).