From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: interaction of MADV_PAGEOUT with CoW anonymous mappings?
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:53:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod6b73_ay_kxph143Aj+XBq04Np0z2bK4Rfn8qppihrmTw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200311084513.GD23944@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:45 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue 10-03-20 15:48:31, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > Maybe instead of just punting on MADV_PAGEOUT for map_count>1 we should
> > only let it affect the *local* process. We could still put the page in
> > the swap cache, we just wouldn't go do the rmap walk.
>
> Is it really worth medling with the reclaim code and special case
> MADV_PAGEOUT there? I mean it is quite reasonable to have an initial
> implementation that doesn't really touch shared pages because that can
> lead to all sorts of hard to debug and unexpected problems. So I would
> much rather go with a simple patch to check map count first and see
> whether somebody actually cares about those shared pages and go from
> there.
>
> Minchan, do you want to take my diff and turn it into the proper patch
> or should I do it.
>
What about the remote_madvise(MADV_PAGEOUT)? Will your patch disable
the pageout from that code path as well for pages with mapcount > 1?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-10 18:08 interaction of MADV_PAGEOUT with CoW anonymous mappings? Jann Horn
2020-03-10 18:48 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-10 19:11 ` Jann Horn
2020-03-10 21:09 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-10 22:48 ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-11 8:45 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-11 22:02 ` Minchan Kim
2020-03-11 23:53 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2020-03-12 0:18 ` Minchan Kim
2020-03-12 2:03 ` Daniel Colascione
2020-03-12 15:15 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-03-10 20:19 ` Daniel Colascione
2020-03-10 21:40 ` Jann Horn
2020-03-10 21:52 ` Daniel Colascione
2020-03-10 22:14 ` Minchan Kim
2020-03-12 8:22 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-12 15:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-12 20:16 ` Minchan Kim
2020-03-12 20:26 ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-12 20:41 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-13 2:08 ` Minchan Kim
2020-03-13 8:05 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-13 20:59 ` Minchan Kim
2020-03-16 9:20 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-17 1:43 ` Minchan Kim
2020-03-17 7:12 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-17 15:00 ` Minchan Kim
2020-03-17 15:58 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-17 17:20 ` Minchan Kim
2020-03-12 21:41 ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-13 2:00 ` Minchan Kim
2020-03-13 16:59 ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-13 21:13 ` Minchan Kim
2020-03-12 23:29 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALvZod6b73_ay_kxph143Aj+XBq04Np0z2bK4Rfn8qppihrmTw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=dancol@google.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).