From: "Zhang, Xiang1" <xiang1.zhang@intel.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
"Marco Elver" <elver@google.com>,
Taras Madan <tarasmadan@google.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC 0/9] Linear Address Masking enabling
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 01:15:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB00787E70E2E0316E5124741DD3A29@MWHPR11MB0078.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOog08O8xmhhXuJ6aTO+ctv8D2yw1_vu8XjQWwsfw707Mg@mail.gmail.com>
There are already in llvm.org.
One of my old patch is https://reviews.llvm.org/D102472 which has been committed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D102901 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D109790
BR
Xiang
-----Original Message-----
From: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 1:16 AM
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>; Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>; Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>; Lutomirski, Andy <luto@kernel.org>; Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>; the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>; Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>; Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>; Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>; Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>; Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>; Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>; Marco Elver <elver@google.com>; Taras Madan <tarasmadan@google.com>; Zhang, Xiang1 <xiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] Linear Address Masking enabling
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 9:52 AM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 15:11, Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 09:24:23AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 4:16 PM Kirill A. Shutemov
> > > <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Linear Address Masking[1] (LAM) modifies the checking that is
> > > > applied to 64-bit linear addresses, allowing software to use of
> > > > the untranslated address bits for metadata.
> > > >
> > > > The patchset brings support for LAM for userspace addresses.
> > > >
> > > > The most sensitive part of enabling is change in tlb.c, where
> > > > CR3 flags get set. Please take a look that what I'm doing makes sense.
> > > >
> > > > The patchset is RFC quality and the code requires more testing
> > > > before it can be applied.
> > > >
> > > > The userspace API is not finalized yet. The patchset extends API
> > > > used by
> > > > ARM64: PR_GET/SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL. The API is adjusted to not
> > > > imply ARM
> > > > TBI: it now allows to request a number of bits of metadata
> > > > needed and report where these bits are located in the address.
> > > >
> > > > There's an alternative proposal[2] for the API based on Intel
> > > > CET interface. Please let us know if you prefer one over another.
> > > >
> > > > The feature competes for bits with 5-level paging: LAM_U48 makes
> > > > it impossible to map anything about 47-bits. The patchset made
> > > > these capability mutually exclusive: whatever used first wins.
> > > > LAM_U57 can be combined with mappings above 47-bits.
> > > >
> > > > I include QEMU patch in case if somebody wants to play with the feature.
> > >
> > > Exciting! Do you plan to send the QEMU patch to QEMU?
> >
> > Sure. After more testing, once I'm sure it's conforming to the hardware.
>
> A follow up after H.J.'s LPC talk:
> https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/11/contributions/1010/
> (also +Carlos)
>
> As far as I understood, this kernel series depends on the Intel CET patches.
>
> Where are these compiler-rt patches that block gcc support?
Hi Xiang,
Please share your compiler-rt changes for LAM.
--
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-22 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-05 15:16 [RFC 0/9] Linear Address Masking enabling Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 15:16 ` [RFC 1/9] mm, arm64: Update PR_SET/GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL interface Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-11 16:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-11 17:06 ` Dave Hansen
2021-02-11 18:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-05 15:16 ` [QEMU] x86: Implement Linear Address Masking support Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 15:16 ` [RFC 2/9] x86/mm: Fix CR3_ADDR_MASK Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 15:16 ` [RFC 3/9] x86: CPUID and CR3/CR4 flags for Linear Address Masking Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 15:16 ` [RFC 4/9] x86/mm: Introduce TIF_LAM_U57 and TIF_LAM_U48 Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 15:16 ` [RFC 5/9] x86/mm: Provide untagged_addr() helper Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 15:16 ` [RFC 6/9] x86/uaccess: Remove tags from the address before checking Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 15:16 ` [RFC 7/9] x86/mm: Handle tagged memory accesses from kernel threads Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 15:16 ` [RFC 8/9] x86/mm: Make LAM_U48 and mappings above 47-bits mutually exclusive Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 15:16 ` [RFC 9/9] x86/mm: Implement PR_SET/GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL with LAM Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 15:42 ` H.J. Lu
2021-02-07 8:07 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-02-07 14:09 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-07 14:11 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-02-05 15:16 ` [QEMU] x86: Implement Linear Address Masking support Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 15:49 ` [RFC 0/9] Linear Address Masking enabling Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-05 16:01 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-05 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-07 8:24 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-02-07 14:11 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-09-21 16:52 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-09-21 17:15 ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-22 1:15 ` Zhang, Xiang1 [this message]
2021-09-22 12:54 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-09-22 20:03 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-09-22 21:33 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-09-23 0:15 ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-23 5:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-09-23 0:07 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MWHPR11MB00787E70E2E0316E5124741DD3A29@MWHPR11MB0078.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=xiang1.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tarasmadan@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).