linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Alex Bee <knaerzche@gmail.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG 5.14] arm64/mm: dma memory mapping fails (in some cases)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:57:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUhpNgwwttW1ewez@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUXQBV6KKi+/Q6gX@kernel.org>

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 02:39:49PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 11:37:22AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 07:18:43AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 12:22:47AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > I did some digging and it seems that the most "generic" way to check if a
> > > > page is in RAM is page_is_ram(). It's not 100% bullet proof as it'll give
> > > > false negatives for architectures that do not register "System RAM", but
> > > > those are not using dma_map_resource() anyway and, apparently, never would.
> > > 
> > > The downside of page_is_ram is that it looks really expensiv for
> > > something done at dma mapping time.
> > 
> > Indeed :(
> > But pfn_valid is plain wrong...
> > I'll keep digging.
> 
> I did some more archaeology and it that check for pfn_valid() was requested
> by arm folks because their MMU may have troubles with alias mappings with
> different attributes and so they made the check to use a false assumption
> that pfn_valid() == "RAM".
> 
> As this WARN_ON(pfn_valid()) is only present in dma_map_resource() it's
> probably safe to drop it entirely. 

I agree, we should drop it. IIUC dma_map_resource() does not create any
kernel mapping to cause problems with attribute aliasing. You'd need a
prior devm_ioremap_resource() if you want access to that range from the
CPU side. For arm64 at least, the latter ends up with a
pfn_is_map_memory() check.

-- 
Catalin


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-20 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-24 13:40 [BUG 5.14] arm64/mm: dma memory mapping fails (in some cases) Alex Bee
2021-08-24 17:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-24 18:06   ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-24 18:28   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-08-24 18:46     ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-24 18:59       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-25 10:20         ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-25 10:28           ` Will Deacon
2021-08-25 10:32             ` Will Deacon
2021-08-25 10:33             ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-25 10:38           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-25 10:54             ` Mike Rapoport
2021-08-25 10:55             ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-25 11:12               ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-25 17:15                 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-25 10:58             ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-25 11:21               ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-25 10:52           ` Mike Rapoport
2021-09-17 21:22           ` Mike Rapoport
2021-09-18  5:18             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-18  8:37               ` Mike Rapoport
2021-09-18 11:39                 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-09-20 10:57                   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-09-21  8:20                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-21  9:34                       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-09-21 15:38                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-22  7:22                           ` Mike Rapoport
2021-09-20 11:13               ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-24 20:14     ` Alex Bee
2021-08-25  4:39       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-08-25 10:00         ` Alex Bee
2021-08-24 20:07   ` Alex Bee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YUhpNgwwttW1ewez@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=knaerzche@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).