linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Paul Gofman <pgofman@codeweavers.com>,
	Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/mm: Smoke test UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:43:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBhxLOBocC7mCYDG@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ab36009-51c0-6583-4948-b267f8fbf32a@redhat.com>

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:25:43AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.03.23 23:37, Peter Xu wrote:
> > Enable it by default on the stress test, and add some smoke tests for the
> > pte markers on anonymous.
> 
> Would it make sense to make kernel support optional and test both paths --
> once with the feature enabled (if available on the kernel we're testing) and
> once with the feature disabled?

Yeah, I think the current uffd selftest is not friendly to old kernels so I
made it simple - IOW the test should fail already on old kernels AFAIK.
Maybe I can prepare some patches this week or next to cleanup some parts of
it.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu



  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-20 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-09 22:37 [PATCH v4 0/2] mm/uffd: Add feature bit UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED Peter Xu
2023-03-09 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/uffd: UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED Peter Xu
2023-03-20 10:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-20 14:41     ` Peter Xu
2023-03-24 15:21   ` Peter Xu
2023-03-09 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/mm: Smoke test UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED Peter Xu
2023-03-20 10:25   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-20 14:43     ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-03-20 15:01       ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBhxLOBocC7mCYDG@x1n \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=pgofman@codeweavers.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).