linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Tyler Sanderson <tysand@google.com>,
	Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] virtio-balloon: Switch back to OOM handler for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:21:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aec61035-68d0-d4e2-25b3-c4f2886e204c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200206041126-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

On 06.02.20 10:12, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 05:34:02PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Commit 71994620bb25 ("virtio_balloon: replace oom notifier with shrinker")
>> changed the behavior when deflation happens automatically. Instead of
>> deflating when called by the OOM handler, the shrinker is used.
>>
>> However, the balloon is not simply some slab cache that should be
>> shrunk when under memory pressure. The shrinker does not have a concept of
>> priorities, so this behavior cannot be configured.
>>
>> There was a report that this results in undesired side effects when
>> inflating the balloon to shrink the page cache. [1]
>> 	"When inflating the balloon against page cache (i.e. no free memory
>> 	 remains) vmscan.c will both shrink page cache, but also invoke the
>> 	 shrinkers -- including the balloon's shrinker. So the balloon
>> 	 driver allocates memory which requires reclaim, vmscan gets this
>> 	 memory by shrinking the balloon, and then the driver adds the
>> 	 memory back to the balloon. Basically a busy no-op."
>>
>> The name "deflate on OOM" makes it pretty clear when deflation should
>> happen - after other approaches to reclaim memory failed, not while
>> reclaiming. This allows to minimize the footprint of a guest - memory
>> will only be taken out of the balloon when really needed.
>>
>> Especially, a drop_slab() will result in the whole balloon getting
>> deflated - undesired. While handling it via the OOM handler might not be
>> perfect, it keeps existing behavior. If we want a different behavior, then
>> we need a new feature bit and document it properly (although, there should
>> be a clear use case and the intended effects should be well described).
>>
>> Keep using the shrinker for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT, because
>> this has no such side effects. Always register the shrinker with
>> VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT now. We are always allowed to reuse free
>> pages that are still to be processed by the guest. The hypervisor takes
>> care of identifying and resolving possible races between processing a
>> hinting request and the guest reusing a page.
>>
>> In contrast to pre commit 71994620bb25 ("virtio_balloon: replace oom
>> notifier with shrinker"), don't add a moodule parameter to configure the
>> number of pages to deflate on OOM. Can be re-added if really needed.
>> Also, pay attention that leak_balloon() returns the number of 4k pages -
>> convert it properly in virtio_balloon_oom_notify().
>>
>> Note1: using the OOM handler is frowned upon, but it really is what we
>>        need for this feature.
>>
>> Note2: without VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST (iow, always with QEMU) we
>>        could actually skip sending deflation requests to our hypervisor,
>>        making the OOM path *very* simple. Besically freeing pages and
>>        updating the balloon. If the communication with the host ever
>>        becomes a problem on this call path.
>>
>> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg40863.html
>>
>> Reported-by: Tyler Sanderson <tysand@google.com>
>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> 
> 
> I guess we should add a Fixes tag to the patch it's reverting,
> this way it's backported and hypervisors will be able to rely on OOM
> behaviour.

Makes sense,

Fixes: 71994620bb25 ("virtio_balloon: replace oom notifier with shrinker")

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-06  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-05 16:33 [PATCH v1 0/3] virtio-balloon: Fixes + switch back to OOM handler David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 16:34 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] virtio-balloon: Fix memory leak when unloading while hinting is in progress David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06  8:36   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-05 16:34 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] virtio_balloon: Fix memory leaks on errors in virtballoon_probe() David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06  8:36   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-05 16:34 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] virtio-balloon: Switch back to OOM handler for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 22:37   ` Tyler Sanderson
2020-02-05 22:52     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 23:06       ` Tyler Sanderson
2020-02-06  7:40   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-06  8:42     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06  8:57       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-06  9:05         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06  9:09           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-06  8:57   ` Wang, Wei W
2020-02-06  9:11   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-06  9:12   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-06  9:21     ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-02-14  9:51   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 13:31     ` Wang, Wei W
2020-02-16  9:47     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-21  3:29       ` Tyler Sanderson
2020-03-08  4:47         ` Tyler Sanderson
2020-03-09  9:03           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 10:14             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-03-09 10:59               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 10:24           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-14 14:06   ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-14 14:18     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 20:48       ` Tyler Sanderson
2020-02-14 21:17         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-16  9:46         ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aec61035-68d0-d4e2-25b3-c4f2886e204c@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tysand@google.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).