linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Aili Yao <yaoaili@kingsoft.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yangfeng1@kingsoft.com, sunhao2@kingsoft.com,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm/gup: check page hwposion status for coredump.
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:09:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afeac310-c6aa-f9d8-6c90-e7e7f21ddf9a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210322193318.377c9ce9@alex-virtual-machine>

On 22.03.21 12:33, Aili Yao wrote:
> When we do coredump for user process signal, this may be one SIGBUS signal
> with BUS_MCEERR_AR or BUS_MCEERR_AO code, which means this signal is
> resulted from ECC memory fail like SRAR or SRAO, we expect the memory
> recovery work is finished correctly, then the get_dump_page() will not
> return the error page as its process pte is set invalid by
> memory_failure().
> 
> But memory_failure() may fail, and the process's related pte may not be
> correctly set invalid, for current code, we will return the poison page,
> get it dumped, and then lead to system panic as its in kernel code.
> 
> So check the hwpoison status in get_dump_page(), and if TRUE, return NULL.
> 
> There maybe other scenario that is also better to check hwposion status
> and not to panic, so make a wrapper for this check, Thanks to David's
> suggestion(<david@redhat.com>).
> 
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210319104437.6f30e80d@alex-virtual-machine
> Signed-off-by: Aili Yao <yaoaili@kingsoft.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> Cc: Aili Yao <yaoaili@kingsoft.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>   mm/gup.c      |  4 ++++
>   mm/internal.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index e4c224c..6f7e1aa 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -1536,6 +1536,10 @@ struct page *get_dump_page(unsigned long addr)
>   				      FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_DUMP | FOLL_GET);
>   	if (locked)
>   		mmap_read_unlock(mm);

Thinking again, wouldn't we get -EFAULT from __get_user_pages_locked() 
when stumbling over a hwpoisoned page?

See __get_user_pages_locked()->__get_user_pages()->faultin_page():

handle_mm_fault()->vm_fault_to_errno(), which translates 
VM_FAULT_HWPOISON to -EFAULT, unless FOLL_HWPOISON is set (-> -EHWPOISON)

?

> +
> +	if (ret == 1 && is_page_hwpoison(page))
> +		return NULL;
> +
>   	return (ret == 1) ? page : NULL;
>   }
>   #endif /* CONFIG_ELF_CORE */
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index 25d2b2439..b751cef 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,26 @@ static inline void set_page_refcounted(struct page *page)
>   	set_page_count(page, 1);
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * When kernel touch the user page, the user page may be have been marked
> + * poison but still mapped in user space, if without this page, the kernel
> + * can guarantee the data integrity and operation success, the kernel is
> + * better to check the posion status and avoid touching it, be good not to
> + * panic, coredump for process fatal signal is a sample case matching this
> + * scenario. Or if kernel can't guarantee the data integrity, it's better
> + * not to call this function, let kernel touch the poison page and get to
> + * panic.
> + */
> +static inline bool is_page_hwpoison(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	if (PageHWPoison(page))
> +		return true;
> +	else if (PageHuge(page) && PageHWPoison(compound_head(page)))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>   extern unsigned long highest_memmap_pfn;
>   
>   /*
> 


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-26 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-17  8:37 [PATCH] mm/gup: check page posion status for coredump Aili Yao
2021-03-17  9:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-18  3:15   ` Aili Yao
2021-03-18  3:18   ` [PATCH v2] " Aili Yao
2021-03-18  4:46   ` [PATCH] " Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-18  5:34     ` Aili Yao
2021-03-19  2:44       ` [PATCH v3] " Aili Yao
2021-03-20  0:35         ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-22  3:40           ` Aili Yao
2021-03-22 11:33           ` [PATCH v5] mm/gup: check page hwposion " Aili Yao
2021-03-26 14:09             ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-03-26 14:22               ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-31  1:52                 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-03-31  2:43                   ` Aili Yao
2021-03-31  4:32                     ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-03-31  6:44                       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-31  7:07                         ` Aili Yao
2021-04-01  2:31                         ` Aili Yao
2021-04-06  2:23                         ` [PATCH v6] mm/gup: check page hwpoison status for memory recovery failures Aili Yao
2021-04-06  2:41                           ` [PATCH v7] " Aili Yao
2021-04-07  1:54                             ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-04-07  7:48                               ` Aili Yao
2021-05-10  3:13                             ` Aili Yao
2021-03-31  6:07                   ` [PATCH v5] mm/gup: check page hwposion status for coredump Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-31  6:53                     ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-03-31  7:05                       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-18  8:14     ` [PATCH] mm/gup: check page posion " David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afeac310-c6aa-f9d8-6c90-e7e7f21ddf9a@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=sunhao2@kingsoft.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yangfeng1@kingsoft.com \
    --cc=yaoaili@kingsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).