linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [patch for-5.3 0/4] revert immediate fallback to remote hugepages
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:59:43 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1910241156370.130350@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53c4a6ca-a4d0-0862-8744-f999b17d82d8@suse.cz>

On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

> From 8bd960e4e8e7e99fe13baf0d00b61910b3ae8d23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:20:58 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mm, thp: tweak reclaim/compaction effort of local-only and
>  all-node allocations
> 
> THP page faults now attempt a __GFP_THISNODE allocation first, which should
> only compact existing free memory, followed by another attempt that can
> allocate from any node using reclaim/compaction effort specified by global
> defrag setting and madvise.
> 
> This patch makes the following changes to the scheme:
> 
> - before the patch, the first allocation relies on a check for pageblock order
>   and __GFP_IO to prevent excessive reclaim. This however affects also the
>   second attempt, which is not limited to single node. Instead of that, reuse
>   the existing check for costly order __GFP_NORETRY allocations, and make sure
>   the first THP attempt uses __GFP_NORETRY. As a side-effect, all costly order
>   __GFP_NORETRY allocations will bail out if compaction needs reclaim, while
>   previously they only bailed out when compaction was deferred due to previous
>   failures. This should be still acceptable within the __GFP_NORETRY semantics.
> 
> - before the patch, the second allocation attempt (on all nodes) was passing
>   __GFP_NORETRY. This is redundant as the check for pageblock order (discussed
>   above) was stronger. It's also contrary to madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) which means
>   some effort to allocate THP is requested. After this patch, the second
>   attempt doesn't pass __GFP_THISNODE nor __GFP_NORETRY.
> 
> To sum up, THP page faults now try the following attempt:
> 
> 1. local node only THP allocation with no reclaim, just compaction.
> 2. THP allocation from any node with effort determined by global defrag setting
>    and VMA madvise
> 3. fallback to base pages on any node
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
>  mm/mempolicy.c  | 16 +++++++++-------
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 24 +++++-------------------
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 4ae967bcf954..2c48146f3ee2 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -2129,18 +2129,20 @@ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp, int order, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		nmask = policy_nodemask(gfp, pol);
>  		if (!nmask || node_isset(hpage_node, *nmask)) {
>  			mpol_cond_put(pol);
> +			/*
> +			 * First, try to allocate THP only on local node, but
> +			 * don't reclaim unnecessarily, just compact.
> +			 */
>  			page = __alloc_pages_node(hpage_node,
> -						gfp | __GFP_THISNODE, order);
> +				gfp | __GFP_THISNODE | __GFP_NORETRY, order);
>  
>  			/*
> -			 * If hugepage allocations are configured to always
> -			 * synchronous compact or the vma has been madvised
> -			 * to prefer hugepage backing, retry allowing remote
> -			 * memory as well.
> +			 * If that fails, allow both compaction and reclaim,
> +			 * but on all nodes.
>  			 */
> -			if (!page && (gfp & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM))
> +			if (!page)
>  				page = __alloc_pages_node(hpage_node,
> -						gfp | __GFP_NORETRY, order);
> +								gfp, order);
>  
>  			goto out;
>  		}

Hi Vlastimil,

For the default case where thp enabled is not set to "always" and the VMA 
is not madvised for MADV_HUGEPAGE, how does this prefer to return node 
local pages rather than remote hugepages?  The idea is to optimize for 
access latency when the vma has not been explicitly madvised.

> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index ecc3dbad606b..36d7d852f7b1 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -4473,8 +4473,11 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  		if (page)
>  			goto got_pg;
>  
> -		 if (order >= pageblock_order && (gfp_mask & __GFP_IO) &&
> -		     !(gfp_mask & __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Checks for costly allocations with __GFP_NORETRY, which
> +		 * includes some THP page fault allocations
> +		 */
> +		if (costly_order && (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)) {
>  			/*
>  			 * If allocating entire pageblock(s) and compaction
>  			 * failed because all zones are below low watermarks
> @@ -4495,23 +4498,6 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  			if (compact_result == COMPACT_SKIPPED ||
>  			    compact_result == COMPACT_DEFERRED)
>  				goto nopage;
> -		}
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Checks for costly allocations with __GFP_NORETRY, which
> -		 * includes THP page fault allocations
> -		 */
> -		if (costly_order && (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)) {
> -			/*
> -			 * If compaction is deferred for high-order allocations,
> -			 * it is because sync compaction recently failed. If
> -			 * this is the case and the caller requested a THP
> -			 * allocation, we do not want to heavily disrupt the
> -			 * system, so we fail the allocation instead of entering
> -			 * direct reclaim.
> -			 */
> -			if (compact_result == COMPACT_DEFERRED)
> -				goto nopage;
>  
>  			/*
>  			 * Looks like reclaim/compaction is worth trying, but
> -- 
> 2.23.0
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-24 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-04 19:54 [patch for-5.3 0/4] revert immediate fallback to remote hugepages David Rientjes
2019-09-04 19:54 ` [rfc 3/4] mm, page_alloc: avoid expensive reclaim when compaction may not succeed David Rientjes
2019-09-05  9:00   ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-05 11:22     ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-05 20:53       ` Mike Kravetz
2019-09-06 20:16         ` David Rientjes
2019-09-06 20:49       ` David Rientjes
2019-09-04 20:43 ` [patch for-5.3 0/4] revert immediate fallback to remote hugepages Linus Torvalds
2019-09-05 20:54   ` David Rientjes
2019-09-07 19:51     ` David Rientjes
2019-09-07 19:55       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-08  1:50         ` David Rientjes
2019-09-08 12:47           ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-08 20:45             ` David Rientjes
2019-09-09  8:37               ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04 20:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-05 21:06   ` David Rientjes
2019-09-09 19:30     ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-25  7:08       ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-26 19:03         ` David Rientjes
2019-09-27  7:48           ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-28 20:59             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-30 11:28               ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-01  5:43                 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-01  8:37                   ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 14:15                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-23 11:03                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-24 18:59                         ` David Rientjes [this message]
2019-10-29 14:14                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-29 15:15                             ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-29 21:33                               ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-29 21:45                                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-29 23:25                                 ` David Rientjes
2019-11-05 13:02                                   ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-06  1:01                                     ` David Rientjes
2019-11-06  7:35                                       ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-06 21:32                                         ` David Rientjes
2019-11-13 11:20                                           ` Mel Gorman
2019-11-25  0:10                                             ` David Rientjes
2019-11-25 11:47                                               ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-25 20:38                                                 ` David Rientjes
2019-11-25 21:34                                                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-01 13:50                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-01 20:31                     ` David Rientjes
2019-10-01 21:54                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-02 10:34                         ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-02 22:32                           ` David Rientjes
2019-10-03  8:00                             ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-04 12:18                               ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1910241156370.130350@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).