linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net,  tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com,
	khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru,  daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com,
	willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,  lkp@intel.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,  richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
	kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
	 rong.a.chen@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
	 shy828301@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 00/19] per memcg lru lock
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:16:34 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.2012141734060.3082@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201214164712.39da20f908c6199eb4cde961@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, 14 Dec 2020, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu,  5 Nov 2020 16:55:30 +0800 Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> 
> > This version rebase on next/master 20201104, with much of Johannes's
> > Acks and some changes according to Johannes comments. And add a new patch
> > v21-0006-mm-rmap-stop-store-reordering-issue-on-page-mapp.patch to support
> > v21-0007.
> 
> I assume the consensus on this series is 'not yet"?

Speaking for my part in the consensus: I don't share that assumption,
the series by now is well-baked and well reviewed by enough people over
more than enough versions, has been completely untroublesome since it
entered mmotm/linux-next a month ago, not even any performance bleats
from 0day, and has nothing to gain from any further delay.

I think it was my fault that v20 didn't get into 5.10: I'd said "not yet"
when you first tried a part of v19 or earlier in mmotm, and by the time
I'd completed review it was too late in the cycle; Johannes and Vlastimil
have gone over it since then, and I'd be glad to see it go ahead into
5.11 very soon. Silence on v21 meaning that it's good.

Various of us have improvements or cleanups in mind or in private tree,
but nothing to hold back what's already there.

> 
> Also, did
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0000000000000340a105b49441d3@google.com get
> resolved?

Alex found enough precedents for that, before inclusion of his series,
so it should not discourage from moving his series forward.  I have
ignored that syzreport until now, but will take a quick try at the
repro now, to see if I'm inspired - probably not, but we'll see.

Hugh


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-15  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-05  8:55 [PATCH v21 00/19] per memcg lru lock Alex Shi
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 01/19] mm/thp: move lru_add_page_tail func to huge_memory.c Alex Shi
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 02/19] mm/thp: use head for head page in lru_add_page_tail Alex Shi
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 03/19] mm/thp: Simplify lru_add_page_tail() Alex Shi
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 04/19] mm/thp: narrow lru locking Alex Shi
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 05/19] mm/vmscan: remove unnecessary lruvec adding Alex Shi
2020-11-11 12:36   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 06/19] mm/rmap: stop store reordering issue on page->mapping Alex Shi
2020-11-06  1:20   ` Alex Shi
2020-11-10 19:06     ` Johannes Weiner
2020-11-11  7:41     ` Hugh Dickins
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 07/19] mm: page_idle_get_page() does not need lru_lock Alex Shi
2020-11-10 19:01   ` Johannes Weiner
2020-11-11  8:17   ` huang ying
2020-11-11 12:52     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 08/19] mm/memcg: add debug checking in lock_page_memcg Alex Shi
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 09/19] mm/swap.c: fold vm event PGROTATED into pagevec_move_tail_fn Alex Shi
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 10/19] mm/lru: move lock into lru_note_cost Alex Shi
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 11/19] mm/vmscan: remove lruvec reget in move_pages_to_lru Alex Shi
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 12/19] mm/mlock: remove lru_lock on TestClearPageMlocked Alex Shi
2020-11-11 13:03   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 13/19] mm/mlock: remove __munlock_isolate_lru_page Alex Shi
2020-11-11 13:07   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 14/19] mm/lru: introduce TestClearPageLRU Alex Shi
2020-11-11 13:36   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-12  2:03     ` Hugh Dickins
2020-11-12 11:24       ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 15/19] mm/compaction: do page isolation first in compaction Alex Shi
2020-11-11 17:12   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-12  2:28     ` Hugh Dickins
2020-11-12  3:35       ` Alex Shi
2020-11-12 11:25       ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 16/19] mm/swap.c: serialize memcg changes in pagevec_lru_move_fn Alex Shi
2020-11-11 18:00   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 17/19] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock Alex Shi
2020-11-05 13:43   ` Alex Shi
2020-11-06  7:48     ` Alex Shi
2020-11-10 18:54       ` Johannes Weiner
2020-11-11 17:46   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-11 17:59     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-12 12:19   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-12 14:19     ` Alex Shi
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 18/19] mm/lru: introduce the relock_page_lruvec function Alex Shi
2020-11-06  7:50   ` Alex Shi
2020-11-10 18:59     ` Johannes Weiner
2020-11-12 12:31   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v21 19/19] mm/lru: revise the comments of lru_lock Alex Shi
2020-11-12 12:37   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-10 12:14 ` [PATCH v21 00/19] per memcg lru lock Alex Shi
2020-11-16  3:45 ` Alex Shi
2020-12-15  0:47 ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-15  2:16   ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2020-12-15  2:28     ` Andrew Morton
2021-01-05 19:30 ` Qian Cai
2021-01-05 19:42   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-01-05 20:11     ` Qian Cai
2021-01-05 21:35       ` Hugh Dickins
2021-01-05 22:01         ` Qian Cai
2021-01-06  3:10           ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.11.2012141734060.3082@eggly.anvils \
    --to=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).