linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkeys: Introduce PKEY_ALLOC_SIGNALINHERIT and change signal semantics
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 23:06:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2df1386-9df9-2db8-0a25-51bf5ff63592@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVrm6yGiv6_z7RqdeB-324RoeMmjpf1EHsrGOh+iKb7+A@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/02/2018 10:41 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

>> See above.  The signal handler will crash if it calls any non-local
>> function through the GOT because with the default access rights, it's
>> not readable in the signal handler.
> 
>> Any use of memory protection keys for basic infrastructure will run into
>> this problem, so I think the current kernel behavior is not very useful.
>>     It's also x86-specific.
> 
>>    From a security perspective, the atomic behavior is not very useful
>> because you generally want to modify PKRU *before* computing the details
>> of the memory access, so that you don't have a general a??poke anywhere
>> with this access righta?? primitive in the text segment.  (I called this
>> the a??suffix problema?? in another context.)
> 
> 
> Ugh, right.  It's been long enough that I forgot about the underlying
> issue.  A big part of the problem here is that pkey_alloc() should set the
> initial value of the key across all threads, but it *can't*.  There is
> literally no way to do it in a multithreaded program that uses RDPKRU and
> WRPKRU.

The kernel could do *something*, probably along the membarrier system 
call.  I mean, I could implement a reasonable close approximation in 
userspace, via the setxid mechanism in glibc (but I really don't want to).

> But I think the right fix, at least for your use case, is to have a per-mm
> init_pkru variable that starts as "deny all".  We'd add a new pkey_alloc()
> flag like PKEY_ALLOC_UPDATE_INITIAL_STATE that causes the specified mode to
> update init_pkru.  New threads and delivered signals would get the
> init_pkru state instead of the hardcoded default.

I implemented this for signal handlers:

   https://marc.info/?l=linux-api&m=151285420302698&w=2

This does not alter the thread inheritance behavior yet.  I would have 
to investigate how to implement that.

Feedback led to the current patch, though.  I'm not sure what has 
changed since then.

If I recall correctly, the POWER maintainer did express a strong desire 
back then for (what is, I believe) their current semantics, which my 
PKEY_ALLOC_SIGNALINHERIT patch implements for x86, too.

Thanks,
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-02 21:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-02 13:26 [PATCH] pkeys: Introduce PKEY_ALLOC_SIGNALINHERIT and change signal semantics Florian Weimer
2018-05-02 14:30 ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-02 15:12   ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-02 15:28     ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-02 21:08       ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-02 22:03         ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-07  9:47           ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-02 17:09     ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-02 17:17       ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-02 20:41         ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-02 21:06           ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2018-05-02 21:23             ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-02 22:08               ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-02 22:22                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-02 22:32                   ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-02 23:32                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-02 23:58                       ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-03  1:14                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-03 14:42                           ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-03 14:42                           ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-03  2:10               ` Ram Pai
2018-05-03  4:05                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-07  9:48                   ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-08  2:49                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-08 12:40                       ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-09 14:41                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-14 12:01                           ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-14 15:32                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-14 15:34                               ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-16 17:01                                 ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-16 20:52                             ` Ram Pai
2018-05-16 20:54                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-16 20:35                         ` Ram Pai
2018-05-16 20:37                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-16 21:07                             ` Ram Pai
2018-05-17 10:09                               ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-17 10:11                           ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-03 14:37               ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-02 21:12     ` Ram Pai
2018-05-02 21:18       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-02 23:38         ` Ram Pai
2018-05-07  9:47           ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-07  9:43         ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2df1386-9df9-2db8-0a25-51bf5ff63592@redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).