linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	"Michael ." <keltoiboy@gmail.com>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Trevor Jacobs <trevor_jacobs@aol.com>,
	Kris Cleveland <tridentperfusion@yahoo.com>,
	Jeff <bluerocksaddles@willitsonline.com>,
	Morgan Klym <moklym@gmail.com>,
	Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org>,
	Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>,
	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI device function not being enumerated [Was: PCMCIA not working on Panasonic Toughbook CF-29]
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 20:13:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200226011310.GA2116625@rani.riverdale.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFq_exHufHyibFCjS78PTZ7duS9ZSt3vi18CNM6+jMmwnw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 04:03:32PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 17:56, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:02:50PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > [+cc Ulf, Philip, Pierre, Maxim, linux-mmc; see [1] for beginning of
> > > thread, [2] for problem report and the patch Michael tested]
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:58:27PM +1100, Michael . wrote:
> > > > Bjorn and Dominik.
> > > > I am happy to let you know the patch did the trick, it compiled well
> > > > on 5.4-rc4 and my friends in the CC list have tested the modified
> > > > kernel and confirmed that both slots are now working as they should.
> > > > As a group of dedicated Toughbook users and Linux users please accept
> > > > our thanks your efforts and assistance is greatly appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Now that we know this patch works what kernel do you think it will be
> > > > released in? Will it make 5.4 or will it be put into 5.5 development
> > > > for further testing?
> > >
> > > That patch was not intended to be a fix; it was just to test my guess
> > > that the quirk might be related.
> > >
> > > Removing the quirk solved the problem *you're* seeing, but the quirk
> > > was added in the first place to solve some other problem, and if we
> > > simply remove the quirk, we may reintroduce the original problem.
> > >
> > > So we have to look at the history and figure out some way to solve
> > > both problems.  I cc'd some people who might have insight.  Here are
> > > some commits that look relevant:
> > >
> > >   5ae70296c85f ("mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller")
> > >   03cd8f7ebe0c ("ricoh_mmc: port from driver to pci quirk")
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAFjuqNi+knSb9WVQOahCVFyxsiqoGgwoM7Z1aqDBebNzp_-jYw@mail.gmail.com/
> > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191021160952.GA229204@google.com/
> >
> > I guess this problem is still unfixed?  I hate the fact that we broke
> > something that used to work.
> >
> > Maybe we need some sort of DMI check in ricoh_mmc_fixup_rl5c476() so
> > we skip it for Toughbooks?  Or maybe we limit the quirk to the
> > machines where it was originally needed?
> 
> Both options seems reasonable to me. Do you have time to put together a patch?
> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe

The quirk is controlled by MMC_RICOH_MMC configuration option. At least
as a short-term fix a bit better than patching the kernel, building one
with that config option disabled should have the same effect.

From the commit messages, the quirk was required to support MMC (as
opposed to SD) cards in the SD slot. I would assume this will be an
issue with the chip in any machine as the commit indicates that the
hardware in the chip detects MMC cards and doesn't expose them through
the SDHCI function.

It looks like the quirk was only enabled by default in 2015, at least
upstream [1], though in Debian it was enabled in May 2010 going by their
git repo, maybe in 2.6.32-16.

[1] commit ba2f73250e4a ("mmc: Enable Ricoh MMC quirk by default")

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-26  1:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAFjuqNihuEb4_5Lny5X7vA258c0ogemVg8pQ5Y_ANgOsqhSXhg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-10-29 17:02 ` PCI device function not being enumerated [Was: PCMCIA not working on Panasonic Toughbook CF-29] Bjorn Helgaas
2020-02-22 16:56   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-02-22 18:14     ` Michael .
2020-02-25 15:03     ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-25 19:15       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-02-25 23:46       ` bluerocksaddles
2020-02-26  1:13       ` Arvind Sankar [this message]
2020-02-26  1:50         ` Michael .
2020-02-26  3:12           ` Trevor Jacobs
2020-02-26  4:51             ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-26  5:20               ` Philip Langdale
2020-02-26  6:10                 ` Michael .
2020-02-26 19:46                   ` bluerocksaddles
2020-07-28  1:50                     ` Michael .
2020-08-02  5:58                       ` Michael .

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200226011310.GA2116625@rani.riverdale.lan \
    --to=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=bluerocksaddles@willitsonline.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=keltoiboy@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=moklym@gmail.com \
    --cc=philipl@overt.org \
    --cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
    --cc=trevor_jacobs@aol.com \
    --cc=tridentperfusion@yahoo.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).