linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the tree

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>]

Hi Al,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in
fs/reiserfs/super.c between commit
d38705358bf6f5ab82348d0c6ee8039cea20ce6b ("reiserfs: kill-the-BKL") from
the reiserfs-bkl tree and commit 8123178eb9ca12cde31a95170746e15a79528a62
("push BKL down into ->put_super") from the vfs tree.

OK, I am not sure what is needed here, so I combined both (see below).  I
can carry this fixup as necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc fs/reiserfs/super.c
index b301f7d,90dcb7b..0000000
--- a/fs/reiserfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/super.c
@@@ -468,13 -465,11 +465,18 @@@ static void reiserfs_put_super(struct s
  	struct reiserfs_transaction_handle th;
  	th.t_trans_id = 0;
  
+ 	lock_kernel();
+ 
 +	/*
 +	 * We didn't need to explicitly lock here before, because put_super
 +	 * is called with the bkl held.
 +	 * Now that we have our own lock, we must explicitly lock.
 +	 */
 +	reiserfs_write_lock(s);
 +
+ 	if (s->s_dirt)
+ 		reiserfs_write_super(s);
+ 
  	/* change file system state to current state if it was mounted with read-write permissions */
  	if (!(s->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
  		if (!journal_begin(&th, s, 10)) {