* linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the cpufreq-current tree
@ 2009-06-12 3:50 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-06-12 3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Dave Jones
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 623 bytes --]
Hi Rusty,
Today's linux-next merge of the rr tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c between commit
ed5a409578578f263a362d6527ad9e5a493e2a44 ("[CPUFREQ] cpumask: avoid
playing with cpus_allowed in speedstep-ich.c") from the cpufreq-current
tree and commit a5b99ac32f444cd1b7d9aa60ee468de15f8d6964
("cpumask:remove-cpumask-games-arch-x86-kernel-cpu-cpufreq-speedstep-ich.c")
from the rr tree.
Just white space differences ... I used the version from the
cpufreq-current tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the cpufreq-current tree
2009-06-12 3:47 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-06-12 19:45 ` Chumbalkar, Nagananda
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chumbalkar, Nagananda @ 2009-06-12 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell, Rusty Russell
Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, Dave Jones
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:sfr@canb.auug.org.au]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:47 PM
> To: Rusty Russell
> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Andrew Morton; Chumbalkar, Nagananda; Dave Jones
> Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the
> cpufreq-current tree
>
> Hi Rusty,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rr tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c between commits
> ec50b17b706931fb5d2854893cfa4b3f96f19276 ("[CPUFREQ] reduce scope of
> ACPI_PSS_BIOS_BUG_MSG[]") and 97f1bb65966b4276581988755238a1b326fce475
> ("[CPUFREQ] powernow-k8: get drv data for correct CPU") from the
> cpufreq-current tree and commit fd9641cb9b0cd9296a83242164d53517351b6aaa
> ("cpumask: avoid playing with cpus_allowed in powernow-k8.c") from the rr
> tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
Hi Stephen, the changes to powernowk8_get() may not work as intended. Please
see the reason, and also other comments below. FYI, Dave has a request on the
"cpufreq" list to rebase this patch:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00771.html
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> index 20c7b99,0e1f6c4..0000000
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> @@@ -1247,14 -1224,41 +1236,40 @@@ static int
> powernowk8_verify(struct cpu
> return cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(pol,
> data->powernow_table);
> }
>
> + struct init_on_cpu {
> + struct powernow_k8_data *data;
> + int rc;
> + };
> +
> + static void __cpuinit powernowk8_cpu_init_on_cpu(void *_init_on_cpu)
> + {
> + struct init_on_cpu *init_on_cpu = _init_on_cpu;
> +
> + if (pending_bit_stuck()) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR PFX "failing init, change
> pending bit set\n");
> + init_on_cpu->rc = -ENODEV;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (query_current_values_with_pending_wait(init_on_cpu->data)) {
> + init_on_cpu->rc = -ENODEV;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (cpu_family == CPU_OPTERON)
> + fidvid_msr_init();
> +
> + init_on_cpu->rc = 0;
> + }
> +
> /* per CPU init entry point to the driver */
> static int __cpuinit powernowk8_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *pol)
> {
> + static const char ACPI_PSS_BIOS_BUG_MSG[] =
> + KERN_ERR FW_BUG PFX "No compatible ACPI _PSS
> objects found.\n"
> + KERN_ERR FW_BUG PFX "Try again with latest BIOS.\n";
> struct powernow_k8_data *data;
> - cpumask_t oldmask;
> + struct init_on_cpu init_on_cpu;
> int rc;
>
> if (!cpu_online(pol->cpu))
> @@@ -1383,11 -1372,23 +1383,21 @@@ static int __devexit
> powernowk8_cpu_exi
> return 0;
> }
>
> + static void query_values_on_cpu(void *_err)
> + {
> + int *err = _err;
> + struct powernow_k8_data *data = __get_cpu_var(powernow_data);
> +
"data" has only local scope. So, powernowk8_get() is not using this data.
Prior equivalent code used to sanity check "data" before calling the function
below. The sanity check was introduced with this commit:
4211a30349e8d2b724cfb4ce2584604f5e59c299
> + *err = query_current_values_with_pending_wait(data);
> + }
> +
> static unsigned int powernowk8_get(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - struct powernow_k8_data *data;
> + struct powernow_k8_data *data = per_cpu(powernow_data, cpu);
The above line duplicates what query_values_on_cpu() is now supposed to do on
the given CPU.
> - cpumask_t oldmask = current->cpus_allowed;
> unsigned int khz = 0;
> + unsigned int first;
The line above seems unnecessary, because smp_call_function_single() should
be called with "cpu", not "first".
> + int err;
> +
> - first = cpumask_first(cpu_core_mask(cpu));
> - data = per_cpu(powernow_data, first);
>
> if (!data)
> return -EINVAL;
>
The above is not actually sanity checking "data" from query_values_on_cpu().
- naga -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the cpufreq-current tree
@ 2009-06-12 3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-12 19:45 ` Chumbalkar, Nagananda
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-06-12 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell
Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, Naga Chumbalkar, Dave Jones
Hi Rusty,
Today's linux-next merge of the rr tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c between commits
ec50b17b706931fb5d2854893cfa4b3f96f19276 ("[CPUFREQ] reduce scope of
ACPI_PSS_BIOS_BUG_MSG[]") and 97f1bb65966b4276581988755238a1b326fce475
("[CPUFREQ] powernow-k8: get drv data for correct CPU") from the
cpufreq-current tree and commit fd9641cb9b0cd9296a83242164d53517351b6aaa
("cpumask: avoid playing with cpus_allowed in powernow-k8.c") from the rr
tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
index 20c7b99,0e1f6c4..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
@@@ -1247,14 -1224,41 +1236,40 @@@ static int powernowk8_verify(struct cpu
return cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(pol, data->powernow_table);
}
+ struct init_on_cpu {
+ struct powernow_k8_data *data;
+ int rc;
+ };
+
+ static void __cpuinit powernowk8_cpu_init_on_cpu(void *_init_on_cpu)
+ {
+ struct init_on_cpu *init_on_cpu = _init_on_cpu;
+
+ if (pending_bit_stuck()) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR PFX "failing init, change pending bit set\n");
+ init_on_cpu->rc = -ENODEV;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (query_current_values_with_pending_wait(init_on_cpu->data)) {
+ init_on_cpu->rc = -ENODEV;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (cpu_family == CPU_OPTERON)
+ fidvid_msr_init();
+
+ init_on_cpu->rc = 0;
+ }
+
/* per CPU init entry point to the driver */
static int __cpuinit powernowk8_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *pol)
{
+ static const char ACPI_PSS_BIOS_BUG_MSG[] =
+ KERN_ERR FW_BUG PFX "No compatible ACPI _PSS objects found.\n"
+ KERN_ERR FW_BUG PFX "Try again with latest BIOS.\n";
struct powernow_k8_data *data;
- cpumask_t oldmask;
+ struct init_on_cpu init_on_cpu;
int rc;
if (!cpu_online(pol->cpu))
@@@ -1383,11 -1372,23 +1383,21 @@@ static int __devexit powernowk8_cpu_exi
return 0;
}
+ static void query_values_on_cpu(void *_err)
+ {
+ int *err = _err;
+ struct powernow_k8_data *data = __get_cpu_var(powernow_data);
+
+ *err = query_current_values_with_pending_wait(data);
+ }
+
static unsigned int powernowk8_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct powernow_k8_data *data;
+ struct powernow_k8_data *data = per_cpu(powernow_data, cpu);
- cpumask_t oldmask = current->cpus_allowed;
unsigned int khz = 0;
+ unsigned int first;
+ int err;
+
- first = cpumask_first(cpu_core_mask(cpu));
- data = per_cpu(powernow_data, first);
if (!data)
return -EINVAL;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-12 19:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-12 3:50 linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the cpufreq-current tree Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-12 3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-12 19:45 ` Chumbalkar, Nagananda
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).