From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Syed Rafiuddin <rafiuddin.syed@ti.com>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm tree
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:20:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090820102004.GD12309@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090819150433.4c12c612.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> [090819 08:04]:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the omap tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c between commit
> 085b54d99b8ee999e7905b8f16e201e0da8ba369 ("ARM: OMAP4: Add UART4
> support") from the arm tree and commit
> 4c29fa3e47342666e12e46f35f40dd90b12cd1a4 ("OMAP: remove OMAP_TAG_UART")
> from the omap tree.
>
> Just context changes (I think). I fixed it up (see below) and can carry
> the fix as necessary.
Thanks yeh the fix looks right. I'll take a look if I can squeeze something
like that into my queue so the merge conflict disappears.
Regards,
Tony
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> index 1b22307,646079f..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> @@@ -38,8 -38,8 +38,8 @@@ static struct platform_device *sdp4430_
> &sdp4430_lcd_device,
> };
>
> - static struct omap_uart_config sdp4430_uart_config __initdata = {
> + static struct omap_uart_platform_data sdp4430_uart_config __initdata = {
> - .enabled_uarts = (1 << 0) | (1 << 1) | (1 << 2),
> + .enabled_uarts = (1 << 0) | (1 << 1) | (1 << 2) | (1 << 3),
> };
>
> static struct omap_lcd_config sdp4430_lcd_config __initdata = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-20 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-19 5:04 linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-20 10:20 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2009-08-20 13:03 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-08-20 13:13 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-08-20 13:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-08-24 13:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-08-24 13:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-26 22:41 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-08 1:37 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-08 10:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-07-04 23:20 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-05 1:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-07-05 7:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-05 13:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-02-04 23:20 Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-04 23:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-02-05 0:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-05 4:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-02-15 15:03 ` Russell King
2010-02-17 19:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-05-28 4:31 Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-28 6:25 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-05-28 6:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-28 6:40 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090820102004.GD12309@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafiuddin.syed@ti.com \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).