From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm tree
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 21:46:27 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1007042144410.6020@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100705092055.859d31d8.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the omap tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S between commit
> df0698be14c6683606d5df2d83e3ae40f85ed0d9 ("ARM: stack protector: change
> the canary value per task") from the arm tree and commit
> 4481d0c7d25c9de9a3986c8b4c52389ca8bbf929 ("arm: Replace
> CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG with HWCAP_TLS and check for it on V6") from the omap
> tree.
>
> Just context changes (I think). I fixed it up (see below) and can carry
> the fix as necessary.
Yes, the fix is fine. If you can carry it until either of those is
merged upstream that would be great.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> index 2d14081,a6cfb17..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> @@@ -739,17 -740,7 +740,12 @@@ ENTRY(__switch_to
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> ldr r6, [r2, #TI_CPU_DOMAIN]
> #endif
> - #if defined(CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG)
> - mcr p15, 0, r3, c13, c0, 3 @ set TLS register
> - #elif !defined(CONFIG_TLS_REG_EMUL)
> - mov r4, #0xffff0fff
> - str r3, [r4, #-15] @ TLS val at 0xffff0ff0
> - #endif
> + set_tls r3, r4, r5
> +#if defined(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> + ldr r7, [r2, #TI_TASK]
> + ldr r8, =__stack_chk_guard
> + ldr r7, [r7, #TSK_STACK_CANARY]
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> mcr p15, 0, r6, c3, c0, 0 @ Set domain register
> #endif
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-05 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-04 23:20 linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-05 1:46 ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2010-07-05 7:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-05 13:44 ` Tony Lindgren
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-26 22:41 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-08 1:37 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-08 10:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-02-04 23:20 Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-04 23:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-02-05 0:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-05 4:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-02-15 15:03 ` Russell King
2010-02-17 19:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-08-19 5:04 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-20 10:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-08-20 13:03 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-08-20 13:13 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-08-20 13:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-08-24 13:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-08-24 13:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-28 4:31 Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-28 6:25 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-05-28 6:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-28 6:40 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1007042144410.6020@xanadu.home \
--to=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).